Assessment of the Number of Missing Tooth Surfaces and the Molecular Findings on the Outcomes of Vital Pulp Therapy Using Two Calcium Silicate Materials (VPT)

June 2, 2025 updated by: Suez Canal University

Assessment of the Number of Missing Tooth Surfaces and a New Bioceramic Material on the Outcomes of Vital Pulp Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Study

The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of full pulpotomy in mandibular molar teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis according to:

A. Number of tooth surfaces defects:

  • Class I cavity defect.
  • Class II cavity defect.

B. Using two types of pulpotomy dressing materials:

  • MTA+ (Cerkamed, Stalowa, Poland).
  • Well-Root PT (Vericom, Gangwon-Do, Korea). And.,

To correlate this outcome to the quantification of two biomolecules:

  • Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-⍺).
  • Matrix metalloproteinases-9 (MMP-9).

Based on the results of the present study, it was concluded that:

  1. Full pulpotomy using calcium silicate cements (CSCs) is considered a conservative, economical, and simple treatment option with a favorable prognosis for teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
  2. Class I and class II cavity defects do not adversely affect pulpotomy prognosis taking into consideration good aseptic condition, magnification, and proper seal of filling materials.
  3. Although MTA+ and Well-Root PT yielded similar outcomes for pulpotomy in terms of success rates. Well-root PT is easier to handle compared to MTA+ and doesn't have a discoloration effect which is considered one of the drawbacks associated with MTA+.
  4. Neither the preoperative pain nor the intraoperative bleeding time within 10 minutes influenced the pulpotomy outcome.
  5. The concentration of TNF-α and MMP-9 biomarkers directly impact the outcome of pulpotomy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The current study addresses an important gap in research, as the impact of cavity configuration on the outcomes of full pulpotomy has not been well explored. Comparing Class I and Class II cavity defects in this context can provide valuable insights, especially given the differences in structural integrity, bacterial infiltration risks, and restorative challenges associated with these defects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ismailia, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mandibular molar teeth with signs and symptoms of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis without radiographic evidence of apical periodontitis.
  • Age range of 21-45 years old.
  • Males or females.
  • No disabilities.
  • Class I and/or class II cavity defects.
  • Teeth reveal positive response to cold tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of open apices.
  • Non-restorable teeth.
  • Teeth in which the pulpal bleeding time is more than 10 minutes.
  • Presence of large carious lesions approaching the root.
  • Presence of calcification or resorption.
  • Periodontally affected teeth.
  • Patients who are taking antibiotics within one week before treatment.
  • Patients consumed taking analgesics within 24 hours before treatment.
  • Systemically compromised patients.
  • Pregnant females.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A. Number of tooth surfaces defects: • Class I cavity defect. • Class II cavity defect.
The selected patients were divided into two groups according to the number of tooth surfaces defects (n=30) (30 with class I and 30 with class II cavity defects)
access to dental pulp chamber under aseptic condition, collect blood sample using a micropipette for ELIZA test, stop bleeding using sodium hypochlorite 2.5%, pulpotomy dressing material over pulp stump and final restoration with resign modified glass ionomer and composite resign
Other Names:
  • Hemostasis
  • collecting pulpal blood samples
  • pulpotomy dressing materials
  • final restoration
Active Comparator: pulpotomy dressing materials: • MTA+ (Cerkamed, Poland). • Well-Root (Vericom, Korea).
Each group was randomly further subdivided using Microsoft Excel into two subgroups according to the dressing materials, without informing the patients which type of material was used (n=15).
access to dental pulp chamber under aseptic condition, collect blood sample using a micropipette for ELIZA test, stop bleeding using sodium hypochlorite 2.5%, pulpotomy dressing material over pulp stump and final restoration with resign modified glass ionomer and composite resign
Other Names:
  • Hemostasis
  • collecting pulpal blood samples
  • pulpotomy dressing materials
  • final restoration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
success/failure
Time Frame: Patients were scheduled for follow-up appointments (one week, 3, 6, and 12 months)

Treatment was considered successful (healed) according to Zanini et al. (2016) based on the following criteria:

(Clinically) absence of signs and symptoms of pulpal pathosis, no history of spontaneous pain or discomfort on chewing, no tenderness to percussion/palpation, no soft tissue swelling, fistula, or abnormal mobility. (Radiographically) absence of periapical rarefaction (normal width of periodontal ligament space and normal appearance of the lamina dura), internal or external resorption, and absence of root canal calcification

Patients were scheduled for follow-up appointments (one week, 3, 6, and 12 months)
Pain assessment
Time Frame: every 24 hours in the evening for 7 days
Pre-treatment, the patients were instructed on how to fill out a visual analog scale VAS to determine their pain score. Postoperative pain was recorded by the patient every 24 hours in the evening for 7 days. The VAS included scores from 0 to 10, which were further categorized as no pain (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), severe (7-9), or severe intolerable (10).
every 24 hours in the evening for 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Dalia Mukhtar Fayyad, Professor of endodontics, Suez Canal University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vital Pulp Therapies

Clinical Trials on full pulpotomy

Subscribe