The Effect of Dexamethasone Administration Route in PENG Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery

March 13, 2026 updated by: Poznan University of Medical Sciences

The Effect of Dexamethasone Administration Route on Pain and Inflammatory Response in PENG Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery

This study aims to assess the impact of the administration route of dexamethasone (intravenous vs. perineural) on postoperative pain, inflammatory response, and neuromonitoring parameters in pediatric patients undergoing hip surgery. The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity measured using an age-appropriate pain scale at multiple time intervals. Secondary outcomes include inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, and overall patient recovery. This randomized, double-blinded study seeks to improve pain management strategies and optimize anesthesia protocols in pediatric hip surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pediatric hip surgery is a complex procedure that can result in significant postoperative pain and an inflammatory response. Effective pain management is critical in this population to promote early mobilization, reduce opioid consumption, and minimize adverse outcomes. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a regional anesthesia technique that offers targeted analgesia for hip procedures while preserving motor function, making it particularly suitable for pediatric patients.

Dexamethasone is commonly used as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia to prolong analgesia and mitigate inflammation. However, the optimal administration route of dexamethasone in the context of PENG block for pediatric hip surgery remains unclear. This study is designed to compare the efficacy of intravenous versus perineural dexamethasone in prolonging postoperative analgesia and reducing inflammatory responses.

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial will enroll pediatric patients undergoing elective hip surgery. Participants will be randomized into two groups: one group will receive intravenous dexamethasone, while the other will receive perineural dexamethasone administered as part of the PENG block. All patients will receive standardized general anesthesia and PENG block using a local anesthetic at a fixed concentration.

The primary outcome will be time to first request rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes include the inflammatory response measured by NLR and PLR, postoperative pain intensity, assessed using an age-appropriate pain scale at predefined time intervals, total opioid consumption, and blood glucose levels. The study will also monitor neuromonitoring parameters during surgery to ensure patient safety and evaluate the influence of dexamethasone on neurological outcomes.

Safety will be closely monitored throughout the study, with particular attention to potential complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) or dexamethasone-related adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Poznan, Poland, 60-701
        • Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children scheduled for hip surgery
  • body weight > 5kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • infection at the site of the regional block,
  • coagulation disorders,
  • immunodeficiency,
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of IV or higher,
  • history of regular steroid medication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: perinerual dexamethasone
PENG block + perineural dexamethasone
PENG block with 0.5ml/kg 0.2% ropivacaine + 0,1mgkg perineural Dexamethasone
Active Comparator: intravenous dexamethasone
PENG block + intravenous dexamethasone
PENG block with 0,5ml/kg 0.2% ropivacaine + 0,1mg/kg intravenous Dexamethasone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first rescue opioid analgesia
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Time to first rescue opioid analgesia
48 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PLR
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio
48 hours after surgery
PLR
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio
12 hours after surgery
PLR
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio
24 hours after surgery
glucose
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
blood glucose levels
24 hours after surgery
glucose
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
blood glucose levels
48 hours after surgery
Nerve damage
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
Nerve damage assesent will be performed using scale: N0- no nerve damage; N1- minor - sensory paresthesia; N2- majorcomplete sensory anesthesia; N3- Complete- complete motor defect with or without paraesthesia; N4-CRPS- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
12 hours after surgery
Nerve damage
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Nerve damage assesent will be performed using scale: N0- no nerve damage; N1- minor - sensory paresthesia; N2- majorcomplete sensory anesthesia; N3- Complete- complete motor defect with or without paraesthesia; N4-CRPS- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
24 hours after surgery
Nerve damage
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Nerve damage assesent will be performed using scale: N0- no nerve damage; N1- minor - sensory paresthesia; N2- majorcomplete sensory anesthesia; N3- Complete- complete motor defect with or without paraesthesia; N4-CRPS- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
48 hours after surgery
glucose
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
blood glucose levels
12 hours after surgery
NLR
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio
24 hours after surgery
NLR
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio
48 hours after surgery
Total opioid consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Total opioid consumption in milliequivalents of morphine
48 hours after surgery
NRS
Time Frame: 4 hours after surgery
The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."
4 hours after surgery
NRS
Time Frame: 8 hours after surgery
The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."
8 hours after surgery
NRS
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."
12 hours after surgery
NRS
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."
24 hours after surgery
NRS
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable."
48 hours after surgery
NLR
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio
12 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Malgorzata Reysner, M.D. Ph.D., Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 14, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Dysplasia

Clinical Trials on perineural Dexamethasone 4mg

Subscribe