Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries

January 30, 2025 updated by: Nada Ezzat, Ain Shams University

A Comparative Study Between the Effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Versus Continuous Adductor Canal Block With Additional Infiltration Between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee (IPACK) After Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries

This study aims to evaluate the effect of Continuous Adductor Canal Block only versus adding posterior knee block, known as the Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) block with Continuous Adductor Canal Block (CACB) after arthroscopic knee surgeries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Enhanced recovery after arthroscopic knee surgery is gaining popularity in orthopedic surgeries. Motor preservation with adequate analgesia has become the optimal postoperative goal, enabling earlier physical therapy, faster recovery, and early hospital discharge. Spinal anesthesia for knee arthroscopy has favorable outcome effects compared with general anesthesia. The positive physiological effects of the provided sympathetic blockade with less blood loss, increased leg blood flow, and better initial pain relief explain this.

An ideal nerve block that targets the sensory nerves and spares the motor function can facilitate early ambulation and rehabilitation, a major goal for patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery.

A novel technique for posterior knee block, known as the infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block combined with continuous adductor canal block (CACB) would reduce opioid requirements.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11591
        • Recruiting
        • Ain Shams University
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mohamed H Shokier, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Waleed Abdalla, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mohamed O Teaima, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mohamed S Ahmed, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 21 to 65 years.
  • Both sexes.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Class I to II.
  • Patients with successful spinal anesthesia.
  • Patients scheduled for elective arthroscopic knee surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) repair.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declining to give written informed consent.
  • History of allergy to the medications used in the study.
  • Contraindications to regional anesthesia (including coagulopathy and local infection).
  • Polytrauma patients having lower limb fractures.
  • Patients with pre-existing myopathy or neuropathy on the operating limb.
  • Patients with diabetes mellitus.
  • Psychiatric disorder.
  • Morbid obesity [body mass index (BMI) > 45kg/m2].
  • Complicated Surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
Patients will receive continuous adductor canal block.
Patients will receive continuous adductor canal block.
Experimental: Group 2
Patients will receive Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee
Patients will receive Continuous Adductor Canal Block with additional Infiltration between The Popliteal Artery and Capsule of The Knee

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of pain
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
The degree of pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. No pain (0-4 mm), mild pain (5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).
24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Nalbuphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Rescue analgesia will be given when VAS score ≥ 30 mm, in the form of IV injection of 10 mg Nalbuphine. Followed by reassessment of pain after 10 minutes, a second dose of Nalbuphine will be given if still VAS score ≥ 30 mm.
24 hours postoperatively
Straight leg rise
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Straight leg rise (SLR) will be recorded.
24 hours postoperatively
Range of motion
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Range of motion (ROM) will be recorded
24 hours postoperatively
Rate of complications
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Rate of complications like falling will be recorded
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMASU MD134/2024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Continuous Adductor Canal Block

Clinical Trials on Continuous adductor canal block

Subscribe