The OSIRIS ECPR Trial (OSIRIS)

January 30, 2025 updated by: Jan Bělohlávek, General University Hospital, Prague

Out-of-hospital Refractory Cardiac Arrest Treated with Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

The OSIRIS trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, multinational, open-label, randomized controlled trial with a 2:1 concealed allocation of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients to the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) based approach versus the conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) approach.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

ECPR for OHCA is a resource-intensive method and poses significant challenges for both prehospital and hospital systems. Recent meta-analyses have highlighted persisting uncertainties regarding the routine use of ECPR strategy for OHCA, emphasizing the need for further research.

The refractory OHCA trial is a multicenter, multinational, open-label, randomized trial with a 2:1 concealed allocation of refractory OHCA patients to ECPR-based approach versus CCPR approach.

ECPR-based approach is defined as advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) per current guidelines with aim to proceed to in-hospital or out-of-hospital veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) if (return of spontaneous circulation) ROSC is not achieved before the cannulation.

CCPR is defined as conventional ACLS per current guidelines without mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use until sustained ROSC is achieved or the patient pronounced dead.

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that invasive, ECPR-based approach when compared to CCPR:

  1. increases survival in selected adults with refractory OHCA.
  2. and can be successfully implemented in different cities and countries.

The study will include adults 18-70 years of age suffering refractory OHCA of presumed cardiac cause. Refractory OHCA is characterized as either 3 unsuccessful defibrillations in ongoing shockable rhythms or 10 minutes of ACLS without ROSC in the case of a non-shockable rhythm following the first or second defibrillation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

686

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 and ≤ 70 years presumed or known
  2. Witnessed OHCA
  3. Bystander CPR provided
  4. Presumed cardiac or unknown cause
  5. An initial documented shockable rhythm of VF (ventricular fibrillation) or pulseless VT (ventricular tachycardia)
  6. Minimum of ≥ 10 min of ACLS without ROSC or at least ≥ 3 defibrillations in ongoing VF/pulseless VT
  7. Body morphology able to accommodate a mechanical chest compression device
  8. ECPR team and intensive care unit (ICU) capacity in the receiving center available
  9. Estimated transfer time from the scene to the hospital ≤ 30 minutes or to the scene ≤ 30 minutes
  10. Eligible for intensive care without restrictions or limitations

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. ACLS ≥ 30 minutes before randomization
  2. Known limitations in care or a Do Not Attempt to Resuscitate (DNAR) order
  3. Known severe disease making 90-day survival unlikely
  4. Known bleeding diathesis or acute or recent intracranial bleeding
  5. Known, obvious or suspected pregnancy
  6. Known pre-arrest severe cognitive dysfunction (mRS ≥ 4)
  7. Known hypothermia as a cause of cardiac arrest

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ECPR-based
ECPR-based approach is defined as advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) per current guidelines with aim to proceed to in-hospital or out-of-hospital veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) if return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is not achieved before the cannulation.
ECPR-based approach is defined as ACLS per current guidelines with aim to proceed to in-hospital or out-of-hospital V-A ECMO if ROSC is not achieved before the cannulation.
Other Names:
  • ECPR-based approach
Active Comparator: CCPR
CCPR is defined as conventional advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) per current guidelines without mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use until sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is achieved or the patient pronounced dead.
CCPR is defined as conventional ACLS per current guidelines without MCS use until sustained ROSC is achieved or the patient pronounced dead.
Other Names:
  • CCPR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90-day survival
Time Frame: 90-days
90-day survival
90-days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
90-day neurological outcome
Time Frame: 90-days
90-day neurological outcome measured using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS-scale) (mRS 0-3 indicating a good outcome, and mRS 4-6 indicating a poor outcome)
90-days
90-day Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 90-days
90-day Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ5D-5L)
90-days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival to discharge
Time Frame: up to 90-days
Survival to hospital discharge for the index event
up to 90-days
30-day survival
Time Frame: 30-days
30-day survival
30-days
Neurological outcome at discharge
Time Frame: up to 90-days
Neurological outcome at discharge from index hospitalization (mRS 0-3 indicating a good outcome, and mRS 4-6 indicating a poor outcome)
up to 90-days
Neurological outcome at 30 days
Time Frame: 30-days
Neurological outcome at 30 days (mRS 0-3 indicating a good outcome, and mRS 4-6 indicating a poor outcome)
30-days
Neurological outcome at 30 days or discharge
Time Frame: discharge date or 30-days
Neurological outcome at 30 days or discharge whatever comes first measured using the mRS scale (mRS 0-3 good outcome, mRS 4-6 poor outcome)
discharge date or 30-days
Win ratio
Time Frame: up to 90-days
Win ratio (Dead vs alive, all steps on the mRS-scale, safety event, HRQoL)
up to 90-days
Potential organ donor
Time Frame: up to 90-days
Number of participants fulfilling criteria of donor after brain death (DBD) or donor after circulatory death (DCD))
up to 90-days
Accepted organ donor
Time Frame: up to 90-days
Number of participants with DBD or DCD who met the established medical, legal, and ethical criteria for organ donation and whose organs were harvested for transplantation.
up to 90-days
Additional mechanical circulatory support (MCS) implantation
Time Frame: up to 90-days
Additional mechanical circulatory support (MCS) implantation (any MCS use in the standard arm or additional MCS implantation to ECMO in the intervention arm)
up to 90-days
Best neurological outcome at any time within 90 days (mRS scale)
Time Frame: up to 90-days
Best neurological outcome at any time within 90 days, assessed using the mRS scale (mRS 0-3 indicating a favorable outcome and mRS 4-6 indicating an unfavorable outcome).
up to 90-days
Cardiovascular mortality at 90 days
Time Frame: 90-days
Mortality due to myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrhytmia, rearrest, ischemic stroke
90-days
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) at 90 days
Time Frame: 90-days
MACE include CV death, nonfatal MI, stroke, resuscitated cardiac arrest
90-days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Clinical Trials on Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation based approach

Subscribe