Performance of Tests for Schistosoma Haematobium Diagnosis (SchistoBreak-D)

September 15, 2025 updated by: Stefanie Knopp

Schistosoma Haematobium Diagnostic Test Performance in the Elimination Setting Pemba, Tanzania

Urogenital schistosomiasis caused by infection with the blood fluke Schistosoma haematobium is a debilitating disease. The World Health Organization (WHO) has set the goal to eliminate schistosomiasis as a public health problem globally by 2030 and to interrupt transmission in selected areas. Many years of control interventions and mass drug administration have reduced substantially the prevalence and infection intensities in several areas. In areas with an infection prevalence <10%, the WHO suggests to continue population preventive chemotherapy with praziquantel at the same or reduced frequency, or to use a clinical approach of test-and-treat. In areas that have achieved interruption of transmission, elimination needs to be validated and post-elimination surveillance be implemented.

For determination of infection prevalence thresholds, for test-and-treat, for validation of elimination and for pre- and post-elimination surveillance, reliable diagnostic tools are needed.

In a single-centre study conducted in Pemba, United Republic of Tanzania, the investigators aim to assess the accuracy and performance of standard and new diagnostic tests for S. haematobium diagnosis for use in elimination settings.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated diagnostic tests, using the S. haematobium egg count results of five urine filtrations conducted on five urine samples collected over five consecutive days as reference test.

Secondary objectives are:

  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated diagnostic tests, using latent class analyses.
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated diagnostic tests, in relation to S. haematobium infection intensity, calculated as mean egg count derived from the egg counts in five urine samples collected over 5 consecutive days.
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated diagnostic tests, in relation to S. haematobium infection intensity, calculated from the egg counts of the urine sample that was analysed with the respective test and urine filtration.
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated diagnostic tests, using the results of the up-converting reporter particle-lateral flow circulating anodic antigen assay (UCP-LF CAA) as reference test.
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated molecular diagnostic tests, using the results of the qPCR as reference test.
  • To assess the cost and time needed for the implementation of single or multiple-throughput tests.

Our study will evaluate the accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests, in a formerly highly endemic setting that is now approaching elimination (Pemba), and will hence provide important information about which tests can be recommended for threshold determination, and test-and-treat and surveillance.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

801

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pemba Island
      • Chake Chake, Pemba Island, Tanzania
        • Public Health Laboratory - Ivo de Carneri (PHL-IdC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Children from Pemba Island, United Republic of Tanzania, that attend one among the two pre-selected study primary schools in grade 3, 4, 5 or 6.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the initial screening:

  • Attendance of grade 3, 4, 5, or 6 in study school
  • Randomized to participate in initial screening
  • Written informed consent signed by the parents
  • Written assent signed by the participant if aged12-17 years old

Subjects fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the diagnostic study:

  • Attendance of grade 3, 4, 5, or 6 in study school
  • Randomized to participate in initial screening
  • Written informed consent signed by the parents
  • Written assent signed by the participant if aged12-17 years old
  • S. haematobium-positive urine filtration result in initial screening OR
  • S. haematobium-negative urine filtration result in initial screening, but randomized for participation in diagnostic study

Exclusion Criteria:

The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria will lead to the exclusion of the subject in the initial screening:

  • Not attending any study school
  • Not attending grade 3, 4, 5 or 6
  • Not randomized to participate in initial screening
  • No written informed consent signed by the parents submitted
  • No written assent signed by the participant if aged12-17 years old submitted
  • S. haematobium-negative urine filtration result in initial screening, and not randomized for participation in diagnostic performance study
  • Clinical significant sever disease

The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria will lead to the exclusion of the subject in the diagnostic study:

  • Not attending any study school
  • Not attending grade 3, 4, 5 or 6
  • Not randomized to participate in initial screening
  • No written informed consent signed by the parents submitted
  • No written assent signed by the participant if aged12-17 years old submitted
  • S. haematobium-negative urine filtration result in initial screening, and not randomized for participation in diagnostic performance study
  • Clinical significant sever disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Participants of initial screening
Schoolchildren that attend classes in grades 3-6 in each of the two study schools will be invited to submit one urine sample that will be tested with a single urine filtration (Day 1).
The urine samples of children participating in the initial screening will be tested with a single urine filtration by human microscopy.
The urine samples collected from children participating in the initial screening and in the diagnostic study, respectively, will be tested with reagent strips.
Participants of diagnostic study
All schoolchildren that are tested S. haematobium-positive children in the initial screening plus a sex-adjusted random selection of initially negative-screened children will be included in the diagnostic study. These children will be invited to submit five urine samples in total, over five days (Day 1-5). All samples (Day 1-5) will be tested with a single urine filtration. Samples collected on Day 5 will be tested with all investigated diagnostic tests.
The urine samples of children participating in the initial screening will be tested with a single urine filtration by human microscopy.
The urine samples collected from children participating in the initial screening and in the diagnostic study, respectively, will be tested with reagent strips.
Five urine samples will be collected from children participating in the diagnostic study over five days. Each of the five urine samples collected per participant will be tested with a single urine filtration by human microscopy.
The urine samples collected on Day 5 of the diagnostic study will be tested with artificial intelligence (AI) microscopy.
The urine samples collected on Day 5 of the diagnostic study will be tested with the up-converting reporter particle-lateral flow circulating anodic antigen assay (UCP-LF CAA).
The urine samples collected on Day 5 of the diagnostic study will be tested with the recombinase polymerase amplification assay (RPA).
The urine samples collected on Day 5 of the diagnostic study will be tested with qPCR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of tests for S. haematobium diagnosis when compared with a single urine filtration
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks

The primary endpoint will be the sensitivity of the investigated diagnostic tests to detect S. haematobium related markers by the examination of a single sample.

The primary outcome variable will be the number of S. haematobium infected individuals detected through each test.

From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of each diagnostic test (human microscopy, AI microscopy, reagent strips, RPA, UCP-CAA, qPCR).
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks
Sensitivity is defined as the proportion of positive test results out of all truly positive samples. Reference tests are human microscopy, UCP-CAA, qPCR or a combination thereof, performed with the same urine sample (human microscopy, UCP-CAA, qPCR) or quintuple urine samples (human microscopy).
From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Specificity of each diagnostic test (human microscopy, AI microscopy, reagent strips, RPA, UCP-CAA, qPCR).
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks.
Specificity is defined as the proportion of negative test results out of all truly negative samples. Reference tests are human microscopy, UCP-CAA, qPCR or a combination thereof, performed with the same urine sample (human microscopy, UCP-CAA, qPCR) or quintuple urine samples (human microscopy).
From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks.
Correlation of infection markers.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks.
Correlation of the amount of infection markers measured by each test (human microscopy: number of S. haematobium eggs, AI microscopy: number of S. haematobium eggs, reagent strips: microhaematuria grading, RPA: fluorescence level, UCP-CAA: amount of CAA antigen, qPCR: cycle-threshold values).
From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks.
Costs of each diagnostic test (human microscopy, AI microscopy, reagent strips, RPA, UCP-CAA, qPCR).
Time Frame: 6 month, from start of orders of equipment and material to end of laboratory work.
Costs are defined as the financial costs incurred by each test for equipment, consumables, and staff time to perform the test.
6 month, from start of orders of equipment and material to end of laboratory work.
Time to conduct each diagnostic test (human microscopy, AI microscopy, reagent strips, RPA, UCP-CAA, qPCR).
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks.
Amount of time spent completing each test.
From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefanie Knopp, PhD, Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
  • Study Director: Said M Ali, MSc, Public Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

  • There are data transfer agreements (DTAs) in place between the Public Health Laboratory-Ivo de Carneri (PHL-IdC) in Pemba and the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Switzerland; Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), The Netherlands; Natural History Museum (NHM), London, UK; and Enaiblers, Sweden.
  • Anonymized data will be curated and stored for an unlimited period in the data repository "Infectious Diseases Data Observatory" (IDDO; https://www.iddo.org/) and/or Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/).
  • Data may be shared with other researchers upon request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schistosoma Haematobium

Subscribe