Exercise and Movement to Enhance Resiliency in Cancer Patients (EMPOWER)

January 22, 2026 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

EMPOWER: Exercise and Movement to Promote Our Patients With (Gynecologic) Cancer to Enhance Resiliency

This is a single-center, pilot, hybrid type 1 design implementation study to evaluate the feasibility and implementation of a personalized digital exercise program and a virtual support group to improve patient-centered outcomes in patients receiving treatment for gynecologic cancer receiving treatment at University of California, San Francisco.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

Stage 1 (single-arm pilot of intervention)

I. To assess the feasibility of recruitment of the EMPOWER intervention.

II. To assess the acceptability of the Exercise and Movement to Enhance Resiliency in Cancer Patients (EMPOWER) intervention.

Stage 2 (pilot randomized study comparing EMPOWER to enhanced usual care (EUS).

I. To assess the feasibility of recruitment of the study when randomized.

II. To assess the acceptability of a randomized study (in both groups)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

Stage 1 and 2

I. To evaluate retention and adherence of the interventions.

II. To evaluate the components of acceptability and adherence of the interventions.

III. To evaluate changes in objective physical activity measures as a single arm pilot study (stage 1) and compared to EUS (stage 2) of the EMPOWER intervention.

IV. To evaluate changes in improving patient reported quality of life measures as a single arm pilot study (stage 1) and compared to EUS (stage 2) of the EMPOWER intervention.

OUTLINE:

Participants will be enrolled in 2 stages.

Stage 1 is a single-arm pilot study testing the EMPOWER intervention to gather feedback for refinement and optimization of the program to implement in Stage 2.

Stage 2 is a pilot, randomized trial where participants will be assigned in a 1 to 1 ratio to either the EMPOWER program or EUS. All participants will be stratified by treatment type (neoadjuvant versus adjuvant therapy).

Participants will be enrolled in these interventions for a total of 16 weeks and receive a 3-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, San Francisco
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephanie Cham, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or older.
  2. Newly diagnosed with a gynecological cancer (including ovarian tubal or peritoneal, uterine, cervical, vaginal, vulvar, and/or gestational trophoblastic neoplasia) and currently undergoing treatment chemotherapy, surgery, etc.).
  3. Able to understand study procedures and to comply with study procedures for the entire length of the study.
  4. Ability to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it.
  5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status < 4.
  6. Willingness to participate and wear an activity tracker (FitBit).
  7. Planning to start systemic treatment or currently receiving Cycle 1 of systemic treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medically ineligible or contraindications to exercise as determined by their oncologist; or contradiction to any other study-related procedure or assessment.
  2. Cognitive or visual impairments that would limit participant's ability to utilize and interact with the DHT platform. Note: If a visually impaired participant has a caregiver who can help them use the DHT platform, the participant will not be excluded.
  3. Existing performance of excessive physical activity (>210 minutes per week of moderate to vigorous intensity exercise at baseline).
  4. Existing enrollment in an exercise program or physical therapy program.
  5. Inability to speak and read English.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stage 1: EMPOWER Feasibility Cohort
The first 20 participants enrolled with receive the EMPOWER intervention which consists of the "Move" mobile application that synchronizes with a FitBit that tracks heart rate, step count, and motion and also receive UCSF-based, online peer support network with individual and small group sessions that occur every four weeks. Questionnaires will be given at baseline, week 9, the end of treatment, and at 3 months after completion of the interventions.
A digital health technology (DHT) called "Move" by Sword Health, which utilizes a mobile app displaying tailored and recommended exercise options, wearable technology (Move wearable or equivalent), and a web-based platform monitored by a physical therapist who will provide individual support
Other Names:
  • Digital health technology (DHT)
  • Move App
An institutional, virtual peer support group session will include a maximum of 5 participant per group
Other Names:
  • Video Support Group
The facilitated group and discussions sessions will be led by a University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) certified health coach (CHC), following a pre-specified agenda and provided virtually
Other Names:
  • Virtual Health Coach
  • Certified Health Coach
Experimental: Stage 2: EMPOWER
Participants randomized to the EMPOWER intervention will receive the "Move" mobile application that synchronizes with a FitBit that tracks heart rate, step count, and motion and also receive UCSF-based, online peer support network with individual and small group sessions that occur every four weeks. Questionnaires will be given at baseline, week 9, the end of treatment, and at 3 months after completion of the interventions.
A digital health technology (DHT) called "Move" by Sword Health, which utilizes a mobile app displaying tailored and recommended exercise options, wearable technology (Move wearable or equivalent), and a web-based platform monitored by a physical therapist who will provide individual support
Other Names:
  • Digital health technology (DHT)
  • Move App
An institutional, virtual peer support group session will include a maximum of 5 participant per group
Other Names:
  • Video Support Group
The facilitated group and discussions sessions will be led by a University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) certified health coach (CHC), following a pre-specified agenda and provided virtually
Other Names:
  • Virtual Health Coach
  • Certified Health Coach
Active Comparator: Stage 2: Enhanced usual care (EUS)
Participants randomized to the EUS group will receive a similar kit that includes a FitBit (equivalent features to what the intervention arm receives), and receive a handout that details recommended national guidelines on exercise during cancer treatment. Participants will be asked to allow the FitBit to be linked to a study email that provides a summary of weekly activity to track activity throughout the study.
A handout with exercise recommendations for those with cancer in accordance with national guidelines
Other Names:
  • Study Handouts
FitBit is a health and activity tracking device placed around the wrist
Other Names:
  • Activity Tracking Device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of participants recommending the EMPOWER intervention (Stage 1 & 2, EMPOWER Participants only)
Time Frame: 1 day
Acceptability of the intervention will be measured by a physician designed questionnaire assessing the acceptability of the EMPOWER intervention. The questionnaire is an 8-item measure of which assesses participants perceived acceptability of the EMPOWER program. Each item response falls on a scale of 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). The percentage of participants with a response of either agree or strongly agree will be reported.
1 day
Percentage of participants adherence to the intervention (Stage 2, EMPOWER Participants only)
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
Adherence to the intervention will be measured for each participant, from week 1 to study completion per data collected by wearable device and by CHC collection. The percentage of participants will be reported
Up to 16 weeks
Recruitment Rate (Stage 1)
Time Frame: Up to 20 days
Feasibility of the intervention is defined as >= 30% recruitment rate for participants in Stage 1.
Up to 20 days
Recruitment Rate (Stage 2)
Time Frame: Up to 20 days
Feasibility of the intervention is defined as >= 30% recruitment rate for participants in Stage 2.
Up to 20 days
Enrollment Rate (Stage 1)
Time Frame: Up to 20 days
Feasibility of the intervention is defined as > 30% enrollment rate for participants in Stage 1.
Up to 20 days
Enrollment Rate (Stage 2)
Time Frame: Up to 20 days
Feasibility of the intervention is defined as > 30% enrollment rate for participants in Stage 2.
Up to 20 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention Rate
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The retention rate of participants in both groups will be reported as a percentage of participants. Retention is defined as >50% of the participants
Up to 16 weeks
Percentage of participants who completed prescribed exercises
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The percentage of participants who completed at least 50% of prescribed exercises will be reported
Up to 16 weeks
Percentage of participants who utilized the mobile application
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The percentage of participants who utilized at least 75% of the mobile application will be reported.
Up to 16 weeks
Percent attendance of the online meetings
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The percentage of participants who attended at least 50% of the online peer support sessions will be reported
Up to 16 weeks
Mean changes in average step count over time
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The mean change in average step count as measured by the wearable device (Move wearable or equivalent) and actigraphy for participants as tracked by a wearable device will be reported along with a 90% confidence interval
Up to 16 weeks
Mean changes in the minutes participants were active over time
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The mean change in average active time as measured in minutes by the wearable device will be reported along with a 90% confidence interval
Up to 16 weeks
Mean changes in scores on the short performance physical battery (SPPB) survey over time
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
The SPPB is an objective measurement instrument developed by the National Institute of Aging (NIA) to measure balance, lower extremity strength, and functional capacity in older adults (>65 years of age). The test includes three different domains (walking, sit-to-stand and balance activities and are assessed and assigned points by a physician or study staff to assess overall functional mobility. Each task is assigned a number of points or a confirmation of completion, with higher points or task completion indicating better balance, better extremity strength, and higher functional capacity. will be performed via video visit. Each component is scored from 0-4 with a total of 12 with higher scores predictive of immobility, reduced activities of daily living (ADLs), and falls.
Up to 16 weeks
Mean changes in scores on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer (PROMIS) Global Health v1.2
Time Frame: Up to 7 months
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale v1.2 - Global Health (also referred to as PROMIS-10) is a ten-item patient reported measure of physical, mental and social health. Items query general health, quality of life, physical health, mental health, satisfaction with discretionary social activities, carrying out every day physical activities, pain, fatigue, satisfaction with social roles, and emotional problems. with a response ranging from 1="Poor" to 5="Excellent" with 1 item addressing pain with a raw score range of 0 "No pain at all" to 10="Worst possible pain". The total raw score ranging from 4 - 50, which are converted to a scaled T-score (range of 16.2 - 67.7) with higher scores indicating a greater overall quality of life. Mean changes in the global score will be reported along with a 90% confidence interval.
Up to 7 months
Mean changes in scores on Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer (PROMIS) Physical function (PF) 10b
Time Frame: Up to 7 months
The PROMIS PF 10b is a 10-item questionnaire which measures respondents' self-reported capability to physically function in the context of cancer and/or cancer treatment experiences with a response ranging from 1="Not at all" to 5="Cannot do", and a total raw score ranging from 10 - 50, which are converted to a scaled T-score (range of 13.8 - 61.3) with higher scores indicating a greater hinderance to engagement in physical activities. The mean change in scores along with a 90% confidence interval will be reported.
Up to 7 months
Mean changes in scores on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer (PROMIS) Fatigue- Short Form 4a
Time Frame: Up to 7 months
This 4-item questionnaire to measure fatigue based on responses to statements about how the participants feel with a response ranging from 1="Not at all" to 5="Very Much", and a total raw score ranging from 4 - 20, which are converted to a scaled T-score (range 33.7 to 75.8) with higher scores indicating a greater feeling of fatigue. The mean change in scores along with a 90% confidence interval will be reported.
Up to 7 months
Mean changes in scores on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) over time
Time Frame: Up to 7 months
The GAD-7 is a seven-item instrument that is used to measure or assess the severity of generalized anxiety disorder. The GAD-7 score is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of "not at all," "several days," "more than half the days," and "nearly every day," respectively, and then adding together the scores for the seven questions. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent cut-points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater. The mean change in scores along with a 90% confidence interval will be reported.
Up to 7 months
Mean changes in scores on the Life Space Assessment (LSA)
Time Frame: Up to 7 months
The LSA is a 5-item questionnaire assessing mobility in adults. Each item on the assessment is associated with 3 factors: Accessing Spaces (0=No, 1=Yes), Frequency (1=Less than 1/week up to 4=Daily), and Independence (1=Personal assistance needed to 2=No equipment or personal assistance needed). Each space level is scored by Accessing Spaces score x Frequency score x Independence score. The total LSA score is calculated by taking the sum of each of the 5 items. Higher scores indicate a higher usage of life space.
Up to 7 months
Mean changes in scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) - Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX)
Time Frame: Up to 7 months
The FACT/GOG-NTX is a 38-item questionnaire to assess symptoms quality of life and peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The FACT/GOG-NTX item responses range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). To calculate the FACT/GOG-Ntx Trial Outcome Index (TOI) score, the sum of the item scores from the physical well-being subscale, the functional well-being subscale and the neurotoxicity subscale are combined to create a TOI score ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better QOL.
Up to 7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephanie Cham, MD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 24, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 244013
  • NCI-2025-00773 (Registry Identifier: NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Digital Health Mobile App

Subscribe