Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block with Bupivacaine and Its Effect on Pain After Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

March 6, 2025 updated by: Ain Shams University
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a minimally invasive procedure that is used in many inflammatory and infectious sinus diseases. Acute postoperative pain can lead to adverse consequences and good postoperative treatment of pain is essential. There is no agreement on a single protocol to treat pain after endoscopic sinus surgeries, and the usually used analgesics have some side effects that hinder their use. Current evidence is insufficient for routine clinical use of the sphenopalatine ganglion block for Functional endoscopic sinus surgery and the efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion block for pain control after functional endoscopic sinus surgery remains controversial. This study aims to explore the influence of sphenopalatine ganglion block on pain intensity after functional endoscopic sinus surgery by comparing two groups, a group receiving the block with Bupivacaine injection, versus saline injection in the other group.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Ain Shams University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: 18 years - 80 years.
  2. ASA I and ASA II patients.
  3. Consented to participate in the research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant and breastfeeding females.
  2. History of allergy to bupivacaine or other local anaesthetics.
  3. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension, poorly controlled cardiovascular diseases, or cerebrovascular diseases.
  4. Patients with pre-existing neurological conditions.
  5. Patients with history of alcohol or drug abuse.
  6. Patients on anticoagulation.
  7. Occurrence of surgical or anaesthetic complications or change in the anaesthesia protocol.
  8. Patients showing sensitivity to Bupivacaine.
  9. Patients unable to understand VAS score.
  10. Patients refusing to continue participating in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A (control group) (n= 35 )
1.5 ml of normal saline was injected in the greater palatine foramen
The sphenopalatine block will be done by the end of the operation using a trans-oral approach at the greater palatine foramen with the help of a Macintosh blade number 3 for good visualization of the hard and soft palate using a 25 Gauge 1.5 inch needle curved at 45 degrees 25 mm from the tip and filled with 1.5 ml of normal saline. The greater palatine foramen is located posteromedial to the third maxillary molar and anteromedial to the pterygoid hamulus and maxillary tuberosity. The foramen will be identified by digital palpation, and the needle will be inserted until reaching the bone then redirected slightly until the foramen is localized and the needle easily gets in the greater palatine canal. aspiration will be done to ensure that no blood vessels are punctured, and the solution will be injected.
Active Comparator: Group B (Bupivacaine group) (n= 35)
1.5 ml of Bupivacaine was injected in the greater palatine foramen.
The sphenopalatine block will be done by the end of the operation using a trans-oral approach at the greater palatine foramen with the help of a Macintosh blade number 3 for good visualization of the hard and soft palate using a 25 Gauge 1.5 inch needle curved at 45 degrees 25 mm from the tip and filled with 1.5 ml of bupivacaine. The greater palatine foramen is located posteromedial to the third maxillary molar and anteromedial to the pterygoid hamulus and maxillary tuberosity. The foramen will be identified by digital palpation, and the needle will be inserted until reaching the bone then redirected slightly until the foramen is localized and the needle easily gets in the greater palatine canal. aspiration will be done to ensure that no blood vessels are punctured, and the solution will be injected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score over the first 24 hours postoperatively.
Time Frame: in the PACU, at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain will be assessed with a 10-cm scale visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
in the PACU, at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Participants with VAS score ≥4 at any point of time and complaining of pain will receive fentanyl (25-50 μg) as a rescue analgesic and the time to the first rescue analgesia will be recorded
24 hours postoperatively
Total requirements of rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Participants with VAS score ≥4 at any point of time and complaining of pain will receive fentanyl (25-50 μg) as a rescue analgesia
24 hours postoperatively
Number of patients receiving rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Participants with VAS score ≥4 at any point of time and complaining of pain will receive fentanyl (25-50 μg) as a rescue analgesic.
24 hours postoperatively
Incidence and severity of adverse effects and complications
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Incidence and severity of adverse effects and complications such as nausea and vomiting (PONV), headache, visual disturbances, sore throat and swallowing difficulty during the first 24 hours postoperatively
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anaesthesia

Clinical Trials on Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block trans oral approach saline injection

Subscribe