Renal Sympathetic Denervation Combined With Aorticorenal Ganglion Ablation for Treatment of Hypertension

Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Renal Sympathetic Denervation Combined With Aorticorenal Ganglion Ablation vs. Renal Sympathetic Denervation Alone for the Treatment of Hypertension: A Multicenter, Prospective, Proof-of-concept Cohort Trials.

The purpose of this prospective cohort proof-of-concept trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) plus aorticorenal ganglion ablation versus RSD alone in the treatment of uncontrolled primary hypertension.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Currently, renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) has become the "third pillar" of hypertension treatment, following lifestyle interventions and pharmacological therapy. However, it still faces challenges such as limited and unstable blood pressure-lowering effects. One of the key factors contributing to the poor efficacy of the procedure is inadequate renal sympathetic nerve ablation, which is influenced by the complex renal artery anatomy and nerve network distribution. From a neuroanatomical perspective, aorticorenal ganglion (ARG) is a crucial hub for sympathetic nerve projection to the kidneys. We hypothesize that on the basis of RSD, additional ablation of aorticorenal ganglion can enhance the BP-lowering effect in patients with uncontrolled primary hypertension. Therefore, we plan to design the first multicenter, prospective, cohort, proof-of-concept trial to compare the efficacy and safety of RSD plus ARG ablation (ARGA) versus RSD alone in the treatment of uncontrolled primary hypertension.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400072
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
    • Nanan
      • Chongqing, Nanan, China, 401336
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and non-pregnant female subjects;
  • 18≤age≤70 years old;
  • Primary hypertension;
  • 24-hour ASBP ≥130mmHg after standard anti-hypertensive drug therapy;
  • Arteries meet the criteria of catheter manipulation;
  • Patient understands the purpose of this study, and is willing to participate and sign the informed consent;
  • Patient is compliant and willing to complete clinical follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abdominal aorta and renal arteries are not eligibility for catheter manipulation: 1) Renal artery stenosis >50% or any renal artery aneurysms on either side 2) History of renal artery percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), including balloon angioplasty and stenting; 3) abdominal aortic dissection, ulceration, or stenosis.
  • eGFR <45ml/min/1.73m2 (MDRD formula)
  • Hospitalized within one year due to hypertensive crisis
  • Participated other clinical trials including both drug and medical device studies within 3 months enrollment
  • Female with pregnant or lactating, or having plans for pregnancy within 1 year
  • Patient with sleep apnea who needs chronic oxygen-breathing or mechanical ventilation support (for example, tracheostomy)
  • Patients previously or currently suffering from one of the following diseases: 1) Essential pulmonary arterial hypertension; 2) Type I diabetes; 3) Severe cardiac valvular stenosis; 4) History of myocardial infraction (MI), unstable angina, syncope or cerebrovascular accidents within half year; 5) History of primary aldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, aorta stenosis, hyperthyroidism or hyperparathyroidism; 6) Any disease conditions interfering the measurement of blood pressure (for instance, severe peripheral artery diseases, abdominal artery aneurysm, hemorrhagic disorders such as thrombocytopenia, hemophilia and severe anemia); 7) Plans to have surgery or cardiovascular interventions within following 6 months; 8) Alcohol abuse or unknown drug dependence history; 9) Neuroticisms such as depression or anxiety disorders; 10) Non-compliant patients unable to finish the research per physician's requests.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: RSD group
High-frequency stimulation (HFS) guided radiofrequency ablation from accessible branches to the opening of the renal artery.
Under the guidance of the 3-dimensional navigation system, HFS was performed from the accessible branches to the proximal (the ostium of renal artery) segments of the bilateral renal arteries, and the target ablation sites were identified by HFS-induced SBP elevation >5mmHg, and radiofrequency ablations were performed with a power setting of 8 to 12 Watts and a duration of 90 seconds. The endpoint of RSD was defined as the elimination or bluntness of HFS-induced SBP elevation response (≤5mmHg). If this was not achieved, ablation was repeated until the desired response was attained.
Experimental: RSD+ARGA group
High-frequency stimulation (HFS) guided radiofrequency ablation from accessible branches to the opening of the renal artery, as well as HFS-guided ARG ablation.
Following RSD, HFS was performed in the the junction area of abdominal aorta and renal arteries to recognize ARG. Radiofrequency ablations were performed with a power setting of 12 to 20 Watts and a duration of 90 seconds. The endpoint of ablation was defined as the elimination or bluntness of HFS-induced SBP elevation response (≤5mmHg). If this was not achieved, ablation was repeated until the desired response was attained.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The change of 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The change of day-time ambulatory systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
The change of night-time ambulatory systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
The change of office systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
The change of drug burden index
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
Time of blood pressure controlling in target range
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary adverse events
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
The primary adverse events was defined as the composite outcomes including all-cause mortality, end-stage renal disease, embolic events with end-organ damage, arterial perforation/dissection requiring intervention, hypertensive crisis requring hospitalization, new-onset renal stenosis (>70%)
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
The score of SF-36
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
SF-36: The Short-From-36 Health Survey
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
The score of GSRS
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
GSRS: gastrointestinal symptom rating scale
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
The score of sexual function scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months
International Index of Erectile Function for male; Femal Sexual Function Index for female.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yuehui Yin, Professor, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Renal sympathetic denervation

Subscribe