Assessing Declined Liver Grafts With Normothermic Machine Perfusion to Reduce Transplant Waiting Time (ExTra)

April 14, 2026 updated by: Nathanael Raschzok, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Pilot, Open, Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial On Quality Assessment Of Declined Liver Grafts By Normothermic Ex Vivo Machine Perfusion For Decreasing Time To Transplantation

The goal of this study is to find out if quality assessment by normothermic machine perfusion can be used to safely increase the number of usable donor livers, helping more people get transplants faster and with better results. This process keeps a donated liver working outside the body before transplantation, allowing surgeons to assess whether livers previously considered unsuitable can still be used.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  • Does this method help patients get a transplant sooner?
  • Can this method make more livers available for transplant?
  • Does it improve survival and health after transplant?

Participants in this study must be on the waiting list for a liver transplant with a ReMELD-Na-Score of 21 or less (equivalent to MELD ≤25) and must not qualify for certain special exceptions. Participants will be randomly placed into one of two groups:

  • Experimental group: In addition to regular organ offers, these participants may receive a liver that was initially not considered for transplantation but meets quality standards after at least four hours of machine perfusion.
  • Control group: These participants will receive a liver through the usual transplant process.

The main measure of success is how quickly participants receive a transplant. Researchers will also look at other important factors, such as survival rates, quality of life, hospital stay, and complications after transplant.

This study may help improve liver transplantation by making better use of available donor livers, reducing waiting times, and improving patient outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with advanced liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria, and severe metabolic or autoimmune liver diseases. However, organ shortage remains a significant issue, particularly in Germany, where only 58% of patients on the waiting list received a transplant in 2022. Patients with MELD ≤25, who are ineligible for [Non]-Standard Exception criteria, face particularly long waiting times and lower transplant rates.

Despite the shortage, approximately 24% of all liver grafts in Germany are declined due to donor age, macrosteatosis, or prolonged cold ischemia. Emerging technologies, such as NMP, allow for objective graft quality assessment before transplantation. Several non-randomized studies in the UK, Netherlands, Australia, and the USA have demonstrated the potential of NMP to increase organ utilization. The ExTra trial is the first randomized controlled study to investigate whether declined liver grafts, following NMP-based quality assessment, can safely and effectively reduce the waiting time for patients with ReMELD-Na-Score ≤ 21(equivalent to MELD ≤25).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hanover, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School
        • Contact:
      • München, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich
        • Contact:
      • Regensburg, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg
        • Contact:
      • Tübingen, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Department of General Visceral and Transplant Surgery
        • Contact:
      • Würzburg, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular, and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Wurzburg
        • Contact:
    • Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg
      • Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Germany, 20251
        • Recruiting
        • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
        • Contact:
    • North Rhine-Westphalia
      • Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 52074
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital RWTH Aachen
        • Contact:
      • Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 53127
      • Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 49149
    • State of Berlin
      • Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Surgery Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Simon Moosburner, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to consent
  • ≥ 18 years old
  • Listed in status "transplantable" by the transplant conference of the study centre for liver transplantation, according to the guidelines of the German Medical Association valid at the time of inclusion
  • ReMELD-Na-Score ≤ 21 (equivalent to MELD ≤25), not eligible for [non]standard exceptions
  • Medically suitable and informed for transplantation with an organ that fulfils extended donor criteria (Eurotransplant ECD criteria)
  • Patient information and written consent to participate in the Extra trial
  • No participation in another interventional study during participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Listed for retransplantation
  • High-Urgency Listing
  • Listed for combined organ transplantation
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of care
Patient will be listed for liver transplantation through standard allocation only.
Experimental: ExTra Option

Patients will receive the option to receive a graft that was declined by all German Transplant Centers but meets predefined quality criteria during at least 4 hours of normothermic machine perfusion (ExTra-LT) or a liver via regular allocation - whichever occurs first.

Declined liver grafts will be allocated based on Eurotransplant's first-come-first-serve principle, with consideration for transport logistics and recipient eligibility. Only grafts meeting the following criteria will be considered: Macrovesicular steatosis <60%, fibrosis grade ≤F3, no histopathologic evidence of cirrhosis, graft weight between 1-2.5 kg, no previous machine perfusion preservation.

Quality assessment using NMP in the experimental arm is performed according to previously published viability criteria for initially declined liver grafts, which are mandatory for all participating study centers, with minor device-specific modifications. These criteria are based on the Birmingham criteria used in the VITTAL trial for viability assessment of DBD and DCD grafts with the OrganOx Metra device and are comparable to the Groningen criteria used with the LiverAssist and PerLife device, with the exception of biliary viability.

These criteria are: Lactate clearance < 2.5 mmol/L, And two or more of the following: Evidence of bile production, maintenance of a perfusate pH >7.30 (without correction for at least one hour), glucose metabolism (falling perfusate glucose value with consistent downward trend), maintenance of stable arterial and portal venous flows (OrganOx Metra: 150 and 500 mL/min respectively), homogeneous perfusion with soft consistency of the parenchyma.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time-to-Transplant
Time Frame: From date of randomization to liver transplantation (up to 12 months after date of randomization)
From date of randomization to liver transplantation (up to 12 months after date of randomization)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death
Time Frame: From date of randomization to death (up to 12 months after date of randomization)
Patient death during the 12-month intervention period, regardless of liver transplantation or not.
From date of randomization to death (up to 12 months after date of randomization)
Proportion of Patients Recovered on the Waitlist
Time Frame: From date of randomization to event (up to 12 months after date of randomization)
Proportion of patients with change in overall health that no liver transplantation is further required in relation to all patients on the waitlist in the trial.
From date of randomization to event (up to 12 months after date of randomization)
Number of patients listed for transplantation after 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
Number of patients listed for transplantation after 12 months.
12 months after randomization
Overall patient survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization to death (up to 24 months after date of randomization)
Overall patient survival in the study.
From date of randomization to death (up to 24 months after date of randomization)
Patient-reported Quality of Life
Time Frame: up to 24 months
Patient-reported Quality of Life measured in the EuroQOL EQ5DL. Two aspects will be reported: The EuroQOL visual analog scale (EQ VAS) on a scale from 0-100 points and the proportion of responses by level of severity for the five EQ-5D-5L dimensions (each reported on a five level scale).
up to 24 months
Graft utilization rate
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Proportion of used livers of all organs offered to patients on the waiting list
up to 12 months
Inpatient Costs for Liver Transplantation
Time Frame: First 90 days after liver transplantation
Analysis of liver transplantation-associated costs. This will be total costs, earnings and profit measured in Euros (EUR) for the primary inpatient stay of liver transplantation.
First 90 days after liver transplantation
Disease Progression
Time Frame: From date of randomization to event (up to 12 months after date of randomization)
Change of ReMELD-Na-Score above 21 while listed as "transplantable" on the waitlist. Occurence of new contraindication for liver transplantation
From date of randomization to event (up to 12 months after date of randomization)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-month Graft Survival
Time Frame: Within 3 months after date of liver transplantation
Graft survival is defined as the need for retransplantation within the first 3 months after liver transplantation. This is one of the "Safety" endpoints and will be evaluated by the Data Safety Monitoring Board.
Within 3 months after date of liver transplantation
3-month Patient Survival
Time Frame: Within 3 months after date of liver transplantation
Patient survival is defined as death within the first 3 months after liver transplantation. This is one of the "Safety" endpoints and will be evaluated by the Data Safety Monitoring Board.
Within 3 months after date of liver transplantation
Patient Survival
Time Frame: 12 months after liver transplantation
Patient Survival after liver transplantation
12 months after liver transplantation
Early graft function
Time Frame: Until 10 days after liver transplantation
Early graft function measured by the Early Allograft Failure Simplified Estimation (EASE) Score on a scale from -6 (extremely low risk) to +6 (unsustainable risk).
Until 10 days after liver transplantation
Intensive Care Unit Stay
Time Frame: First 30 days after liver transplantation
Length of stay on the intensive care unit in days.
First 30 days after liver transplantation
Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: First 90 days after liver transplantation
Total duration of days spent in the hospital after liver transplantation.
First 90 days after liver transplantation
Comprehensive Complication Index
Time Frame: Until 90 days after liver transplantation
Post-transplant Comprehensive Complication Index, measured on a scale of 0-100, to quantify procedure related morbidity.
Until 90 days after liver transplantation
Biliary Complications
Time Frame: Until 12 months after liver transplantation
Ischemic-Type Biliary Lesions (clinically and as part of the planned MRCP 12 months after liver transplantation)
Until 12 months after liver transplantation
Graft Survival
Time Frame: 12 months after liver transplantation
Graft survival after liver transplantation.
12 months after liver transplantation
Acceptance Rate
Time Frame: Until 12 months after randomization
1 / number of unrealized organ offers [accepted for the patient either primarily or within the extended/rescue allocation but not transplanted]
Until 12 months after randomization
Graft-Rescue Rate
Time Frame: Until 12 months after randomization
Livers that meet quality criteria during NMP / all organs assessed through NMP in the study
Until 12 months after randomization
Risk of Graft Loss
Time Frame: On day of liver transplantation (within the 12 month intervention period after date of randomization)
Risk of early graft loss as measured by the Balance of Risk (BAR) Score on a scale from 0-27.
On day of liver transplantation (within the 12 month intervention period after date of randomization)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20024292
  • 543051616 (Other Identifier: German Research Foundation)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual Participant Data will not be shared due to data protection regulations and ethical considerations. Given the sensitive nature of the data, strict confidentiality measures must be maintained to protect participants' privacy. Compliance with GDPR and institutional policies prevents the disclosure of personally identifiable information, ensuring that data handling aligns with legal and ethical standards.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Diseases

Clinical Trials on Quality Assessment with Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP)

Subscribe