Comparing Effect of Opioid-sparing Versus Conventional Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery After Emergency Laparotomy (O-S Anesthesia)

March 21, 2025 updated by: Mai Madkour, Cairo University

Comparing Effect of Opioid-sparing Versus Conventional Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery After Emergency Laparotomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Aim of the Work The investigators aim to compare lidocaine-based anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia in the presence of multimodal analgesia protocol in terms of early quality of recovery and analgesic efficacy.

Objectives To compare quality of recovery using the Quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score between lidocaine-based anesthesia in relation to conventional anesthesia in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.

Hypothesis the investigators hypothesize that lidocaine-based regimen would be effective in reducing opioid use and provide superior quality of recovery compared to conventional opioid-routine anesthesia in emergency laparotomy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (18-65 years)
  • ASA I-III undergoing emergency laparotomy with midline incision.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cardiac morbidities (impaired contractility with ejection fraction < 45%, heart block, arrhythmias, tight valvular lesions) and patients on beta-blockers
  • Patients on vasopressor infusion, patients with high shock index (heart rate / systolic blood pressure >1)
  • Body mass index <18 or > 35 Kg/m2,

    • Pregnant or lactating women,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: opioid sparing
two syringes of lidocaine 10 mg/mL will be prepared. A 10-mL syringe (induction syringe) will be given during the induction of anesthesia and A 50 mL syringe (infusion syringe) will be used as continuous infusion.
: two syringes of lidocaine 10 mg/mL will be prepared. A 10-mL syringe (induction syringe) will be given during the induction of anesthesia and A 50 mL syringe (infusion syringe) will be used as continuous infusion.
Placebo Comparator: conventional
A 10-mL syringe of 10 mcg/mL fentanyl (induction syringe) and a 50-mL syringe of saline (infusion syringe) will be prepared as placebo.
A 10-mL syringe of 10 mcg/mL fentanyl (induction syringe) and a 50-mL syringe of saline (infusion syringe) will be prepared as placebo.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
- Quality of recovery using the QoR-15 score 24 h after surgery.
Time Frame: 24 hours
- Quality of recovery using the QoR-15 score 24 h after surgery. An 11-point numerical rating scale (for positive items, 0 = "none of the time" to 10 = "all of the time"; for negative items the scoring was reversed; maximum score 150).
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 12, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia Recovery Period

Clinical Trials on : two syringes of lidocaine 10 mg/mL will be prepared. A 10-mL syringe (induction syringe) will be given during the induction of anesthesia and A 50 mL syringe (infusion syringe) will be used as conti

Subscribe