- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06889376
Use of Intranasal Midazolam to Reduce Stress and Procedural Pain in Premature Infants During Routine ROP Examination.
The Use of Intranasal Sedation with Midazolam to Reduce Stress, Discomfort and Procedural Pain in Preterm Newborns and Infants During Routine ROP Screening
The goal of this study is to learn about the safety and effectiveness of intranasal midazolam in newborns and infants born prematurely, undergoing Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) screening.
The main question it aims to answer is:
• Does use of intranasal midazolam is a safe, quick, non-invasive medication, that reduces the pain, stress, discomfort, and other complications in patients undergoing ROP screening?
Researchers will compare the intervention group with a comparison group of the patients who will receive routine comfort care.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The aim of this parallel, prospective, nonblinded randomised control trial is to assess the effectiveness and safety of intranasal midazolam administered before ROP screening using the DART™ intranasal atomization device in preterm newborns and infants.
Participants: Preterm newborns and infants eligible for routine ROP screening. Recruitment: Parental/legal guardian consent required before random assignment to either the study or control group.
Study Groups and Randomization:
Random Assignment: Block randomization will be used. • Sample Size: 40 newborns/infants (20 in control, 20 in study group).
Study intervention and monitoring:
• Study Group (midazolam group) Intervention: intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) administered 10 minutes before ROP screening via the DART™ intranasal atomization device.
Comfort Measures:
- 1 ml of 20% glucose solution orally with a pacifier, 5 minutes before screening.
- Swaddling and placement under the radiant warmer.
Monitoring:
- Vital signs: heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation recorded 10 minutes before screening until 2 hours post-examination.
- Pain assessment (PIPP scale) conducted before, during, and 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure.
- Modified N-PASS scale to assess the level of sedation conducted before, during, 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure.
Control Group (non-midazolam group)
- No midazolam administered.
- Comfort measures: 1 ml of 20% glucose solution orally with a pacifier 5 minutes before screening. Swaddling and placement under the radiant warmer.
Monitoring:
- Vital signs: heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation recorded 10 minutes before screening until 2 hours post-examination.
- Pain assessment (PIPP scale) conducted before, during, and 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure.
In both groups, observations for:
- Respiratory Distress (apnoea, desaturation, increased work of breathing)
- Cardiovascular Instability (Bradycardia, tachycardia, hypotension)
- Neurological Symptoms (Lethargy, seizures, abnormal tone)
- Gastrointestinal Issues (Feeding intolerance, NEC-like symptoms)
- Infections & Sepsis (Confirmed or suspected based on clinical signs)
Study Outcome Assessment:
Change in pain and stress symptoms during ROP screening, measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP).
Clinical safety of intranasal midazolam using a nasal atomizer (DART™ intranasal atomization device) in newborns/infants.
Assessment of sedation post intranasal midazolam administration.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Agnieszka Nowacka, MSc
- Phone Number: +48 607603226
- Email: agn.nowacka@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Lodz, Poland, 93-338
- Polish Mother's Health Center Institute Rzgowska 281/289, 93-338 Lodz
-
Contact:
- Agnieszka Nowacka, Lek. med.
- Phone Number: +48607603226
- Email: agnieszka.nowacka@iczmp.edu.pl
-
Contact:
- Agnieszka Nowacka, Lek. med
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Newborns qualified for ophthalmologic screening examination to detect retinopathy of prematurity (ROP):
a. Newborns/infants born before the 32 weeks of gestation and/or with a birth weight <1500 g.
- Obtaining informed consent from a parent/legal guardian.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Newborns/infants not qualified for screening ophthalmologic examination (ROP).
- Newborns/infants clinically unstable, with respiratory disorders/cardiovascular instability before the ophthalmologic examination.
- Newborns/infants with congenital developmental defects.
- Newborns/infants receiving analgesic/sedative medications for other reasons.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intranasal midazolam and comfort care
The newborn/infant qualified for the ROP screening will receive intranasal midazolam before the procedure using a nasal atomizer. The newborn/infant will also receive comfort care |
Intervention: Intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) administered 10 minutes before ROP screening via the DART™ intranasal atomization device. Comfort Measures:
Monitoring:
Observations for signs of:
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
Control Group (non-midazolam group)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain assessment pre and post intranasal midazolam administration
Time Frame: PIPP Score Assessment Time Points: 5 minutes before drug administration, during drug administration, 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure
|
Primary Endpoint: - Change in the occurrence of pain symptoms and stress associated with screening ophthalmologic examination (ROP). Use of Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score
|
PIPP Score Assessment Time Points: 5 minutes before drug administration, during drug administration, 10, 30 minutes 1 hour and 2 hours post-procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of clinical safety of intranasal midazolam using a nasal atomizer (DART™ intranasal atomisation device) in newborns/infants.
Time Frame: Neonatal Adverse Event Severity Scale (NAESS) will be reported up to 24 hours following drug administration.
|
To accurately report the adverse events during intranasal midazolam administration using a nasal atomizer (DART™ intranasal atomisation device) in newborns/infants, the Neonatal Adverse Event Severity Scale (NAESS) will be used. This scale contains generic severity criteria that can occur in neonates, followed by a list of 35 specific medical conditions: neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, infectious, general and any other symptoms Each of the criteria is divided into grading system: Grade 1 - Mild Grade 2 - Moderate Grade 3 - Severe Grade 4 - Life- threatening Grade 5 - Death Assessment of the severity of the adverse event is based on the observation of the changes in the following components: age appropriate behavioural changes, changes from the baseline in the vital signs, changes in the required care and monitoring. Only changes from the baseline condition will be considered as a reported adverse-events. |
Neonatal Adverse Event Severity Scale (NAESS) will be reported up to 24 hours following drug administration.
|
|
Sedation assessment after intranasal midazolam administration.
Time Frame: Modified N-PASS score used to assess level of sedation time points: 5 minutes before drug administration, during drug administration, 10, 30 minutess, 1 hour and 2 hours post - drug administration.
|
To assess the sedation status after intranasal midazolam administration, Modified N-PASS: Neonatal Sedation Assessment Scale will be used. The assessment criteria of the scale include:
Deep sedation: -10 to -6 Light sedation: -5 to - 2 Normal: -1 to +3 |
Modified N-PASS score used to assess level of sedation time points: 5 minutes before drug administration, during drug administration, 10, 30 minutess, 1 hour and 2 hours post - drug administration.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Ewa Gulczyńska, Professor, Polish Mother's Health Center Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Brummelte S, Grunau RE, Chau V, Poskitt KJ, Brant R, Vinall J, Gover A, Synnes AR, Miller SP. Procedural pain and brain development in premature newborns. Ann Neurol. 2012 Mar;71(3):385-96. doi: 10.1002/ana.22267. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
- COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN and SECTION ON ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PAIN MEDICINE. Prevention and Management of Procedural Pain in the Neonate: An Update. Pediatrics. 2016 Feb;137(2):e20154271. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4271. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
- Ballantyne M, Stevens B, McAllister M, Dionne K, Jack A. Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clin J Pain. 1999 Dec;15(4):297-303. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199912000-00006.
- Mitchell AJ, Green A, Jeffs DA, Roberson PK. Physiologic effects of retinopathy of prematurity screening examinations. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011 Aug;11(4):291-7. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318225a332.
- Morgan ME, Kukora S, Nemshak M, Shuman CJ. Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale's use, reliability, and validity: a systematic review. J Perinatol. 2020 Dec;40(12):1753-1763. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00840-7. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
- Salaets T, Lacaze-Masmonteil T, Hokuto I, Gauldin C, Taha A, Smits A, Thewissen L, Van Horebeek I, Shoraisham A, Mohammad K, Suzuki M, Komachi S, Michels K, Turner MA, Allegaert K, Lewis T. Prospective assessment of inter-rater reliability of a neonatal adverse event severity scale. Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 7;14:1237982. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1237982. eCollection 2023.
- Salaets T, Turner MA, Short M, Ward RM, Hokuto I, Ariagno RL, Klein A, Beauman S, Wade K, Thomson M, Roberts E, Harrison J, Quinn T, Baer G, Davis J, Allegaert K; International Neonatal Consortium. Development of a neonatal adverse event severity scale through a Delphi consensus approach. Arch Dis Child. 2019 Dec;104(12):1167-1173. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317399. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
- Vinall J, Miller SP, Chau V, Brummelte S, Synnes AR, Grunau RE. Neonatal pain in relation to postnatal growth in infants born very preterm. Pain. 2012 Jul;153(7):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.007.
- Snyers D, Tribolet S, Rigo V. Intranasal Analgosedation for Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review. Neonatology. 2022;119(3):273-284. doi: 10.1159/000521949. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
- Pasero C. Pain assessment in infants and young children: Premature Infant Pain Profile. Am J Nurs. 2002 Sep;102(9):105-6. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200209000-00065. No abstract available.
- Francis K. What Is Best Practice for Providing Pain Relief During Retinopathy of Prematurity Eye Examinations? Adv Neonatal Care. 2016 Jun;16(3):220-8. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000267.
- Moral-Pumarega MT, Caserio-Carbonero S, De-La-Cruz-Bertolo J, Tejada-Palacios P, Lora-Pablos D, Pallas-Alonso CR. Pain and stress assessment after retinopathy of prematurity screening examination: indirect ophthalmoscopy versus digital retinal imaging. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Aug 28;12:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-132.
- Thirunavukarasu AJ, Hassan R, Savant SV, Hamilton DL. Analgesia for retinopathy of prematurity screening: A systematic review. Pain Pract. 2022 Sep;22(7):642-651. doi: 10.1111/papr.13138. Epub 2022 Jun 27. Erratum In: Pain Pract. 2023 Jan;23(1):127. doi: 10.1111/papr.13169.
- Slevin M, Murphy JF, Daly L, O'Keefe M. Retinopathy of prematurity screening, stress related responses, the role of nesting. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Sep;81(9):762-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.9.762.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Pain, Procedural
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anesthetics
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- GABA Modulators
- GABA Agents
- Midazolam
Other Study ID Numbers
- 98/2024
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Drug Safety
-
West China Second University HospitalCompletedDrug Safety | Drug Metabolism | Medication SafetyChina
-
Nanjing Ruijie Pharma Co., Ltd.Recruiting
-
Prolong PharmaceuticalsTerminated
-
SignPath Pharma, Inc.Completed
-
Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
Mahidol UniversitySiriraj HospitalUnknown
-
University of DundeeNHS Tayside; NHS FifeCompleted
-
Entera Bio Ltd.Completed
-
West China HospitalCompleted
-
Hui XuRecruiting