- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06889441
Pacifier Use and Infant Development
Effect of Pacifier Use on Motor Development and Sensory Processing Skills in Infants
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Pacifier use is a very common practice. It is often used in the early years of a child's life to help them fall asleep or to soothe and calm them down from teething pain. The age at which a pacifier is discontinued is usually around the age of three when the child goes to nursery. Observational studies have linked early pacifier use with breastfeeding problems leading to early weaning. However, randomized controlled trials have not shown a similar negative association between early pacifier use and successful breastfeeding, suggesting that pacifier use may be a sign of breastfeeding problems and not the cause. Pacifier use is often a topic of debate when parents and professionals aim to maintain and support breastfeeding. However, the literature supports the beneficial effects of pacifier use in infants because of the associated physiological benefits, such as digestion, behavioral organization, pain management, motor function, and sucking development.
Pacifier use reduces the risk of sudden infant death syndrome, and nonnutritive sucking has been shown to improve physiological balance and feeding in premature infants. Therefore, the risks and benefits of pacifier use should be carefully considered. In a study, it was reported that giving a pacifier on the 15th day did not change the prevalence and duration of breastfeeding, that using a pacifier was associated with a lower incidence of sudden infant death syndrome, and that giving a pacifier was a useful approach. Using a pacifier can help the baby calm down and adapt to the environment. When the literature was reviewed, conflicting results were reported regarding using a pacifier. However, the effect of using a pacifier on the baby's motor development and especially sensory processing skills has not been clearly investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate babies using a pacifier in terms of both motor development and sensory processing skills and to compare them with their peers who did not use a pacifier.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Nigde, Turkey
- Nigde Omer Halisdemir University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Full-term infants who have used a pacifier for at least 6 months and are still using it,
- Babies who do not have sucking dysfunction and are breastfed for the first 6 months,
- Post-term infants who are between 9-12 months old
Exclusion Criteria:
- Premature infants
- Infants with congenital malformations
- Infants diagnosed with metabolic, neurological and genetic diseases
- Children whose parents do not volunteer for the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
pacifier user
Full-term infants who have used a pacifier for at least 6 months will be included in the study.
The infants' motor development and sensory processing skills will be evaluated.
|
It was planned to use the Test of sensory function in infants to evaluate the sensory development of infants.
The test of sensory function in infants is frequently used to evaluate the sensory processing functions of infants aged 4-18 months.
It is used to determine whether an infant has a sensory processing problem and to what extent.
It consists of 24 items.
The test of sensory function in infants requires the infant to be stimulated and interacted with various materials.
The total score varies between 0-49 and the test has normative values for different age groups.
Although it is used from the fourth month onwards, the most reliable and valid results are obtained between 7-18 months.
The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition is a standardized, norm-referenced assessment instrument designed to evaluate both gross and fine motor skills in children aged 0 to 71 months.
It is frequently employed in clinical, educational, and research contexts to detect motor developmental delays, monitor developmental trajectories, and inform intervention strategies.
Notably, higher scores on the scale reflect superior motor performance, indicating better developmental outcomes
The infant/toddler sensory profile is a questionnaire filled out by the child's primary caregiver to collect information about sensory processing abilities.
The test evaluates sensory processing in 6 different areas.
These items consist of general, visual, auditory, vestibular, tactile and oral sensory processing.
The caregiver evaluates the child's behavior on a 5-point scale.
One point means "almost always" and five points means "almost never".
The caregiver's responses are summarized using standard scoring procedures and then interpreted in terms of the impact of a child's sensory processing abilities on the child and their family's lives.
The scores are normative for age and are important in assessing sensory development.
|
|
non-pacifier
The motor development and sensory processing skills of full-term infants who are 9-12 months old and do not use a pacifier will be evaluated.
The developmental results of both groups will be compared
|
It was planned to use the Test of sensory function in infants to evaluate the sensory development of infants.
The test of sensory function in infants is frequently used to evaluate the sensory processing functions of infants aged 4-18 months.
It is used to determine whether an infant has a sensory processing problem and to what extent.
It consists of 24 items.
The test of sensory function in infants requires the infant to be stimulated and interacted with various materials.
The total score varies between 0-49 and the test has normative values for different age groups.
Although it is used from the fourth month onwards, the most reliable and valid results are obtained between 7-18 months.
The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition is a standardized, norm-referenced assessment instrument designed to evaluate both gross and fine motor skills in children aged 0 to 71 months.
It is frequently employed in clinical, educational, and research contexts to detect motor developmental delays, monitor developmental trajectories, and inform intervention strategies.
Notably, higher scores on the scale reflect superior motor performance, indicating better developmental outcomes
The infant/toddler sensory profile is a questionnaire filled out by the child's primary caregiver to collect information about sensory processing abilities.
The test evaluates sensory processing in 6 different areas.
These items consist of general, visual, auditory, vestibular, tactile and oral sensory processing.
The caregiver evaluates the child's behavior on a 5-point scale.
One point means "almost always" and five points means "almost never".
The caregiver's responses are summarized using standard scoring procedures and then interpreted in terms of the impact of a child's sensory processing abilities on the child and their family's lives.
The scores are normative for age and are important in assessing sensory development.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Peabody Developmental Motor Scales | Second Edition
Time Frame: 9-12 months
|
The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition is a standardized, norm-referenced assessment instrument designed to evaluate both gross and fine motor skills in children aged 0 to 71 months.
The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-Second Edition comprises six subtests, namely Reflexes, Stationary, Locomotion, Object Manipulation, Grasping, and Visual-Motor Integration, which collectively measure a broad spectrum of motor functions including postural control, locomotor abilities, object manipulation, and hand-eye coordination.
The subtests generate three composite scores: the Gross Motor Quotient, Fine Motor Quotient, and Total Motor Quotient, offering a comprehensive evaluation of a child's motor competence.
Notably, higher scores on the scale reflect superior motor performance, indicating better developmental outcomes
|
9-12 months
|
|
Test of Sensory Functions in Infants
Time Frame: 9-12 months
|
It was planned to use the Test of sensory function in infants to evaluate the sensory development of infants.
The test of sensory function in infants is frequently used to evaluate the sensory processing functions of infants aged 4-18 months.
It is used to determine whether an infant has a sensory processing problem and to what extent.
It consists of 24 items.
The test of sensory function in infants requires the infant to be stimulated and interacted with various materials.
The total score varies between 0-49 and the test has normative values for different age groups.
Although it is used from the fourth month onwards, the most reliable and valid results are obtained between 7-18 months.
|
9-12 months
|
|
Infant/toddler sensory profile
Time Frame: 9-12 months
|
Infant/toddler sensory profile; The infant/toddler sensory profile is a questionnaire filled out by the child's primary caregiver to collect information about sensory processing abilities.
It is a questionnaire that questions the behavior and performance of a child between the ages of 0-3 (0-7 months and 7-36 months) regarding sensory processing.
The test evaluates sensory processing in 6 different areas.
These items consist of general, visual, auditory, vestibular, tactile and oral sensory processing.
The caregiver evaluates the child's behavior on a 5-point scale.
One point means "almost always" and five points means "almost never".
The caregiver's responses are summarized using standard scoring procedures and then interpreted in terms of the impact of a child's sensory processing abilities on the child and their family's lives.
The scores are normative for age and are important in assessing sensory development.
|
9-12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rabia ZORLULAR, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cabral TI, Pereira da Silva LG, Tudella E, Simoes Martinez CM. Motor development and sensory processing: A comparative study between preterm and term infants. Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Jan;36C:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.09.018. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
- Dunn, W. and D.B. Daniels, Initial development of the infant/toddler sensory profile. Journal of Early Intervention, 2002. 25(1): p. 27-41.
- Howard CR, Howard FM, Lanphear B, Eberly S, deBlieck EA, Oakes D, Lawrence RA. Randomized clinical trial of pacifier use and bottle-feeding or cupfeeding and their effect on breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 2003 Mar;111(3):511-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.3.511.
- Barnes DM, Hanby AM, Gillett CE, Mohammed S, Hodgson S, Bobrow LG, Leigh IM, Purkis T, MacGeoch C, Spurr NK, et al. Abnormal expression of wild type p53 protein in normal cells of a cancer family patient. Lancet. 1992 Aug 1;340(8814):259-63. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92354-i.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- pacifier use
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sensory Processing Disorder
-
Boston University Charles River CampusCompletedSensory Processing DisorderUnited States
-
University of Southern DenmarkProtac A/SRecruitingChildren | Sensory Processing DisorderDenmark
-
Uskudar UniversityHacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...CompletedSensory Processing DisorderUnited States
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingSensory Processing Disorder | Motor Skills DisordersPakistan
-
Pingale, Vidya, OTRTina S. Fletcher, EdD, MFA, OTR; Catherine Candler, PhD, OTR; Noralyn Pickens... and other collaboratorsCompletedSensory Processing Disorder | Autism | Special EducationUnited States
-
University of NebraskaTerminatedAutism Spectrum Disorder | Sensory Processing Disorder | Autism | Sensory Over-ResponsivityUnited States
-
Reinier Haga Orthopedisch CentrumDelft University of TechnologyRecruitingSensory Processing | Perception | Sense of Touch | TactionNetherlands
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNational Taiwan University; National Science and Technology CouncilNot yet recruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Sensory Processing Disorder
-
Centre Psychothérapique de NancyInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceRecruitingSchizophrenia | Sensory Processing DisorderFrance
Clinical Trials on Test of sensory function in infants
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedSleep | Motor Development | Late Preterm InfantTurkey
-
Nigde Omer Halisdemir UniversityCompletedMotor Development | Sepsis Newborn | Sensory Integration DysfunctionTurkey
-
Nigde Omer Halisdemir UniversityCompletedSleep | Motor Development | Colic, Infantile | Sensory Integration DysfunctionTurkey
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedMotor Development | Congenital Muscular Torticollis | Sensory Integration DisorderTurkey
-
Gazi UniversityCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted
-
CEU San Pablo UniversityCompleted
-
Security Forces HospitalCompletedFetal Complications | Pregnancy in DiabetesSaudi Arabia
-
Nimet Sermenli AydınNot yet recruiting