Automated V Manual Impactor Study

March 25, 2025 updated by: tnicholson, Rothman Institute Orthopaedics

Do Quantifiable Differences in Physiologic Stress Exist in Surgeons When Comparing the Use of a Powered Femoral Impactor Versus Manual Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

This study investigates the use of an automated impactor device in total hip arthroplasty versus manual malleting method and the physiological strain on the surgeon. This study will be a randomized, prospective, multicenter study involving fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. Each participating surgeon will contribute data from 50 primary, elective THA cases, using the HAMMR powered impactor in 25 cases and manual impaction in 25 cases.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Rothman Orthopaedic Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients undergoing primary elective THAs Participants over the age of 18 Patients with compatible implants

Exclusion Criteria:

Attending orthopaedic surgeons with pre-existing cardiorespiratory or musculoskeletal conditions Use of cemented or hybrid THA Patients undergoing a conversion or revision THA Patients undergoing a non-elective THA (i.e., for fracture) Participants lacking cognitive capacity to consent Participants who are pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Manual Malleting Group
For cases that are randomized to the manual malleting group, surgeons will utilize a manual mallet to perform impaction during total hip arthroplasty while wearing the Hexoskin shirt.
For cases that are randomized to the manual malleting group, the surgeon will utilize a mallet for impaction of the implant during total hip arthroplasty.
Active Comparator: Automated Impaction HAMMR Group
For cases that are randomized to the automated impaction HAMMR group, surgeons will utilize an automated impaction device to perform impaction during total hip arthroplasty while wearing the Hexoskin shirt.
For cases that are randomized to the automated impaction HAMMR group, the surgeon will utilize an automated impactor device for impaction of the implant during total hip arthroplasty.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physiological strain in the surgeon
Time Frame: 1 day
Through the use of a Hexoskin vest worn by the surgeon, we will measure heart rate, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, minute ventilation, and energy expenditure to determine overall physiological strain on the surgeon during total hip arthroplasty.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Patient adverse events such as periprosthetic fractures intra- or postoperatively, intraoperative soft tissue injury, etc. will be recorded intra or postoperatively.
6 weeks
F-NRS
Time Frame: 1 day
We will assess the Fatigue numeric rating scale (F-NRS) of surgeons after each case via survey.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Camilo Restrepo, MD, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • JLON1384286

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physiological Strain

Clinical Trials on Manual Malleting

Subscribe