SH-LPS System in Preoperative Planning for Liver Resection

April 2, 2025 updated by: Yuhua Zhang, MD, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

SH-LPS System in Preoperative Planning for Liver Resection: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Effective preoperative planning and real-time intraoperative guidance are crucial for performing accurate liver resections. To address this need, the researchers have designed advanced 3D-printed liver models using a self-healing elastomer, created through the copolymerization of 4-acryloylmorpholine (ACMO) and methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) acrylate (mPEGA). These models demonstrate outstanding healing properties, swiftly restoring their structure within minutes at room temperature, and quickly recovering after incisions.

In previous studies, Professor Yuhua Zhang, the project applicant, collaborated with a team from Zhejiang University to develop a 3D-printed liver model that is self-healing and reusable for repeated cutting. They preliminarily explored the feasibility of applying this model for preoperative planning and surgical training for liver surgeries. The results were published in Nature Communications (Lu et al., Nat Commun. Dec 19;14(1):8447). Building on this, the applicant intends to establish a personalized liver surgery planning system (Personalized Liver Surgery Planning System Based on High-Fidelity 3D Printed Self-Healing Liver Models, SH-LPS), which will assess, through a randomized controlled trial, the value of SH-LPS in improving liver surgery efficiency and safety.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-80 years old;
  • Patients with a resectable tumor in the liver;
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status score: 0;
  • Child-Pugh classification: A;
  • The Laboratory test results meet the following criteria and patients can tolerate surgery: Haemoglobin≥90g/L, Neutrophil count≥1.5×10⁹/L, Platelet count≥100×10⁹/L, Aspartate or alanine aminotransferase≤5 upper limits of normal(ULN), alkaline phosphatase≤2.5 ULN, Serum albumin≥30g/L, serum creatinine<1.5 ULN, International normalized ratios(INR)≤2 or rothrombin time(PT)exceed ULN≤6s, Creatinine clearance≥60 mL/min.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with extra-hepatic metastasis;
  • Anti-cancer therapy or surgery such as radiotherapy, radiofrequency ablation in 28 days prior to the surgery;
  • Clinically significant bleeding or bleeding tendencies within 3 months prior to enrollment or on thrombolytic or anticoagulant therapy;
  • Severe lung disease (eg, acute lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis that affects lung function, interstitial lung disease), uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (fasting blood glucose ≥10 mmol/L);
  • There are other unsuitable candidates for clinical trials, such as mental illness or alcohol dependence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 3D group
A three-dimensional digital model is constructed based on the patient's CT/MRI data and a physical model is printed. Using the model's self-healing property after cutting, multiple simulated surgeries are performed to help plan the optimal surgical approach. The best surgical path derived from the model is combined with traditional CT/MRI data to determine the final surgical path, and the surgery is then performed according to this finalized path.
A three-dimensional digital model is constructed based on the patient's preoperative CT/MRI images, and a personalized physical model is created using 3D printing. This model has the ability to self-heal after being cut. Surgeons can perform multiple simulated surgeries on the model to plan the optimal surgical path before the authetic surgery
Sham Comparator: CT/MRI group
The surgical approach is planned based on traditional two-dimensional CT/MRI images, and the surgery is performed according to this planned path.
Obtain the patient's CT/MRI images and determine the definitive surgical path based on the two-dimensional images.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opertation duration
Time Frame: Until the end of the surgey
The duration from the start to the end of the surgery.
Until the end of the surgey
Blood loss
Time Frame: Until the end of the surgey
Blood loss during the operation
Until the end of the surgey

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
R0 resection rate
Time Frame: Until the day the official pathology report comes out, an average of two weeks
The percentage of surgical cases in which the tumor is completely removed with no microscopic residual cancer cells left at the margins of the resected tissue
Until the day the official pathology report comes out, an average of two weeks
Surgical complications
Time Frame: Until three months after the surgery
The incidence rate of surgical complications
Until three months after the surgery
Postoperative hospital stay.
Time Frame: Until the day the patient is discharged, an average of one week.
Postoperative hospital stay refers to the period of time a patient remains in the hospital after undergoing surgery, until they are medically stable and deemed fit for discharge.
Until the day the patient is discharged, an average of one week.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-2025-27(IIT)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preoperative Planning

Clinical Trials on 3D printed models

Subscribe