Feasibility and Effect of Wrapping Nerves With a Multi-Layer Perinatal Tissue Allograft During Prostatectomy (RAP)

November 7, 2025 updated by: Mayo Clinic

RAP: Prospective Pragmatic Multi-Site Trial Evaluating the Feasibility and Effect of Wrapping the Cavernous Nerves With a Novel Multi-Layer Perinatal Tissue Allograft During Prostatectomy

This clinical trial studies whether a new multi-layer perinatal tissue allograft, MLG-Complete (Trademark), can be used to improve complications after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients with prostate cancer that has not spread to other parts of the body (localized). Two major complications that can happen after complete surgical removal of the prostate (radical prostatectomy) include erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence, both of which greatly affect a patient's quality of life and social well-being. The goal of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is to preserve erectile and urinary function, but damage to the surrounding nerves and blood vessels can still occur causing the patient to experience the complications. An allograft is the transplant of an organ, tissue, or cells from one individual to another individual of the same species who is not an identical twin. The MLG-Complete allograft is made up of perinatal tissue and is placed on the nerve bundles during a nerve-sparing RARP. It is meant to serve as a barrier and provide coverage to the nerve bundles from the surrounding environment, which may improve post-nerve-sparing RARP complications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224-9980
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic in Florida
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ram Pathak, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male subjects with age ≥ 45
  • Primary diagnosis of prostate cancer selected for surgical intervention (radical prostatectomy)
  • Primary diagnosis of organ confined (i.e. localized) untreated prostate cancer
  • Planned elective radical prostatectomy with bilateral nerve sparing technique
  • Negative urinalysis within 30 days prior to date of surgery
  • Patient has no erectile dysfunction (SHIM score ≥ 19) at the time of consultation
  • Willing to comply with instruction of the investigator
  • Willing to comply with follow-up surveys
  • Ability to provide written consent
  • Negative urinary tract infection at the time of consultation
  • Interest in penetrative sexual intercourse

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High-risk cancer planned for neoadjuvant therapy, full or partial excision of neurovascular bundles
  • Unable to comply with learning and documenting penile rehabilitation, including oral 5-phosphodiesterase inhibitor use, vacuum pump therapy use, and/or injectable medications
  • History of >14 days treatment with immunosuppressants (including systemic corticosteroids), cytotoxic chemotherapy within one month prior to initial screening, or who receive such medications during the screening period
  • Prior hormonal therapy such as Lupron or oral anti-androgens
  • Poor urinary control at baseline requiring the use of pads for leakage
  • Previous history of pelvic radiation
  • Previous history of simple prostatectomy or transurethral prostate surgery
  • Patients with obesity defined as body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m^2
  • History of open pelvic surgery ≤ 5 prior to registration (except for hernia repair)
  • Scheduled to undergo chemotherapy, radiation, hormone therapy, or open surgery during the study period
  • Any neurologic disorder or psychiatric disorder that might confound postsurgical assessments
  • Has any condition(s) which seriously compromises the subject's ability to participate in this study, sign consent, or has a known history of poor adherence with medical treatment
  • In the opinion of the principal investigator (PI), has a history of drug or alcohol abuse ≤ 12 months prior to registration
  • Allergic to aminoglycoside antibiotics (such as gentamicin and/or streptomycin)
  • Received administration of an investigational drug within 30 days prior to registration, and/or has planned administration of another investigational product or procedure during participation in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Supportive care (MLG-Complete allograft)
Patients undergo placement of MLG-Complete allograft to nerve bundles over 5 minutes during standard of care nerve-sparing RARP.
Ancillary studies
Undergo placement of MLG-Complete allograft
Other Names:
  • allograft

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ability to place MLG-Complete allograft without lengthening operative time (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Baseline [time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)]
Feasibility is defined as the overall technical ability to place the MLG-Complete allograft in included patients without significantly lengthening operative time. This will be defined by a yes/no evaluation by the surgeon.
Baseline [time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)]
Incidence of serious adverse events related to graft placement
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks post-RARP
Will be assessed according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Up to 6 weeks post-RARP

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average time for return of potency
Time Frame: At 6-weeks and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post RARP
Will be defined as the ability to achieve an erection sufficient for intercourse for at least 50% of the time or at least 50% rigidity post RARP. Will be assessed using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) and patient-reported history. The SHIM is a five-question instrument with a score of 1-25 points. A higher score generally indicates greater ability to achieve an erection.
At 6-weeks and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post RARP
Average time for return to continence
Time Frame: At 6-weeks and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
Return to continence will be defined as use of =< 1 pad post-RARP.
At 6-weeks and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
Change in AUASS
Time Frame: At baseline, 6-weeks post-RARP, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
The American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUASS) consists of 5 questions related to urological symptoms over the past month. Questions are answered on a scale of 0-5 where 0=not at all and 5=almost always and one question related to nighttime urination (times per night average over the past month). A lower overall score indicates lesser urological symptoms.
At baseline, 6-weeks post-RARP, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
Change in Quality of Life - AUASS survey
Time Frame: At baseline, 6-weeks post-RARP, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
Assessed with a single survey question answered on a scale of 0-6 where 0=delighted and 6=terrible.
At baseline, 6-weeks post-RARP, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
Change in ICIQ-UI
Time Frame: At baseline, 6-weeks post-RARP, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire: Short Form for Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-UI) is a 4-item questionnaire related to urine incontinence over the past 4 weeks. A higher summary scores indicates worse incontinence.
At baseline, 6-weeks post-RARP, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
Change in QoL - EPIC-26
Time Frame: At baseline, 6-weeks post-RARP, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) is a 26-item questionnaire related to Quality of Life issues in patients with Prostate Cancer. The survey consists of 26 items under 5 domains: urinary incontinence, urinary irritative/obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal.
At baseline, 6-weeks post-RARP, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
Unplanned interactions with the healthcare team
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The proportion of patients with an unplanned phone call, portal message, or unscheduled clinic, emergency room, or urgent care visit will be computed and presented. The total number of unplanned phone calls, portal messages, or health care visits will be summarized.
Up to 12 weeks
Cost/value analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months post-RARP
Costs of prescription [Oral Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitor (PDE-5i), Intracavernosal injection, Alprostadil urethral suppository) or future surgery (inflatable penile prosthesis] will be recorded.
Up to 12 months post-RARP
Change in SHIM
Time Frame: At baseline, 6-weeks post-RARP, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP
Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scores will be collected at study enrollment, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 month, and 12 months. The SHIM consists of five questions that explore aspects of erectile function. Scores range from 1-25. A score of 20 or higher indicates a normal degree of erectile functioning. Lower scores (10 or less) indicate moderate to severe erectile dysfunction (ED).
At baseline, 6-weeks post-RARP, and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-RARP

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ram A. Pathak, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 14, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MC240501 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic)
  • NCI-2025-02552 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • 23-013215 (Other Identifier: Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Localized Prostate Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Survey Administration

Subscribe