Efficacy And Tolerability Of Alpha Lipoic Acid And Vitamin B Preparation In Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

April 15, 2025 updated by: Anna Misyail Abdul Rashid, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Evaluating The Efficacy And Tolerability Of The Oral Combination Of Alpha Lipoic Acid And Vitamin B Complex Preparation In Carpal Tunnel Syndrome : a Single-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness and safety of an oral combination of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) and vitamin B complex in treating mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the combination of ALA and vitamin B improve nerve function (based on electrodiagnostic studies) in patients with CTS?
  • Does this treatment reduce CTS-related symptoms and improve quality of life?
  • What side effects, if any, do participants experience while taking the treatment?

Researchers will compare the combination of ALA and vitamin B to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no active drug) to evaluate its effectiveness.

Participants will:

  • Take the ALA and vitamin B combination or a placebo once daily for 6 months.
  • Attend clinic visits at the start of the study, after 3 months, and after 6 months for physical examinations, nerve conduction studies, and to complete questionnaires about their symptoms and quality of life.
  • Receive follow-up phone calls and reminder messages to ensure medication compliance and attendance at scheduled visits.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The patients were randomized to receive oral combination of alpha lipoic acid and vitamin B (alpha lipoic acid; 300mg, methylcobalamin; 500mcg, vitamin B1; 39mg and vitamin B6; 8mg), 2 tablets once daily or placebo drug (maltodextrin, microcrystalline cellulose, tricalcium phosphate, silicon gioxide, magnesium stearate) 2 tablets once daily. Randomization sequence was done by using an online random number generator program using a mixed block randomization technique at a ratio of 1:1. In cases of serious adverse event, unblinding process was incorporated where the identity of the drug was revealed to manage the subject's condition. This was done by intruding the emergency code key by the researcher. All patients provided a written consent for the study.

During visit 1, a thorough history and physical examination were done, and demographic data was collected. Afterward, the patients were required to answer three sets of self-administered questionnaires: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), Visual analogue score (VAS) and SF-36. The BCTQ is a specific questionnaire for assessing CTS that consists of two distinct scales, the Symptom Specific Scale (SSS) which has 11 items and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) containing 8 items. Each scale generates a final score ranging from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability and poor symptoms control. BCTQ is a reliable questionnaire to assess CTS owing to its high cross-cultural adaptation and multilingual validity and reliability. The VAS is a visual scale with 0 scored as "no pain" and 10 as "worst pain imaginable" and serves as an excellent tool for pain score with excellent validity and reproducibility. The SF-36 is a quality-of-life questionnaire that comprises of 36 questions covering eight domains of health which are; Physical Functioning (PF), Role Limitations due to Physical Health, Role Limitations (RL) due to Emotional Problems (RE), energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health (GH) where a higher score indicates a better outcome . After the administration of these questionnaires, they will be subjected for a nerve conduction study (NCS) to determine the severity of CTS. The NCS were performed by the same trained personnel to ensure consistency and accuracy.

The patients were reassessed at Visit 2 (3 months post-treatment) and Visit 3 (6 months post-treatment). During each visit, they underwent physical examination, NCS, and were required to complete the three sets of questionnaires (BCTQ, VAS, and SF-36). They were also required to fill in the form regarding the side effects of the treatments. The investigators made a phone call and sent reminder message at the 6th and 18th week to ensure compliance, medication adequacy and follow up review. During the study, patients were allowed to undergo the standard of care treatment at our center such as physiotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Selangor
      • Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia, 43000
        • Hospital Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients with numbness and tingling sensation at the first finger until the radial site of the 4th finger
  • and/or fulfil the electrodiagnostic criteria of mild to moderate CTS, based on the Padua Scale as defined below:

    • Mild: abnormal digit/wrist Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity (CV) and normal Distal Motor Latency (DML)
    • Moderate: abnormal digit/wrist Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity (SNCV) and abnormal Distal Motor Latency (DML).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • patients with symptoms of CTS but have normal NCS
  • patients taking traditional or complementary medication for CTS
  • patients with electrodiagnostic criteria of severe or extreme CTS as defined in the Padua scale:

    • Severe: Absence of sensory response (SNAP) and abnormal Distal Motor Latency (DML).
    • Extreme: Absence of motor (CMAP) and sensory responses (SNAP).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treament
alpha lipoic acid; 300mg, methylcobalamin; 500mcg, vitamin B1; 39mg and vitamin B6; 8mg 2 tablets once daily
alpha lipoic acid; 300mg, methylcobalamin; 500mcg, vitamin B1; 39mg and vitamin B6; 8mg, 2 tablets once daily
Other Names:
  • Group A
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
maltodextrin, microcrystalline cellulose, tricalcium phosphate, silicon gioxide, magnesium stearate 2 tablets once daily
maltodextrin, microcrystalline cellulose, tricalcium phosphate, silicon gioxide, magnesium stearate 2 tablets once daily
Other Names:
  • Group B

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement on Nerve Conduction Study
Time Frame: Enrolment (Visit 0) to Visit 1 (3 months) and to Visit 2 (6 months)
Electrodiagnostic improvement of the median nerve on Nerve Conduction Study (NCS)
Enrolment (Visit 0) to Visit 1 (3 months) and to Visit 2 (6 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvements in symptoms using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)
Time Frame: Enrolment (Visit 0) to Visit 1 (3 months) and to Visit 2 (6 months)
The BCTQ is a specific self administered questionnaire for assessing CTS that consists of two distinct scales, the Symptom Specific Scale (SSS) which has 11 items and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) containing 8 items. Each scale generates a final score ranging from 1 to 5, with a higher score indicating greater disability and poor symptoms control. BCTQ is a reliable questionnaire to assess CTS owing to its high cross-cultural adaptation and multilingual validity and reliability
Enrolment (Visit 0) to Visit 1 (3 months) and to Visit 2 (6 months)
Improvements in symptoms using the visual analog score (VAS)
Time Frame: Enrolment (Visit 0) to Visit 1 (3 months) and to Visit 2 (6 months)
The VAS is a visual scale with 0 scored as "no pain" and 10 as "worst pain imaginable" and serves as an excellent tool for pain scoring with excellent validity and reproducibility
Enrolment (Visit 0) to Visit 1 (3 months) and to Visit 2 (6 months)
Improvements in quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire
Time Frame: Enrolment (Visit 0) to Visit 1 (3 months) and to Visit 2 (6 months)
The SF-36 is a quality-of-life is a self administered questionnaire that comprises 36 questions covering eight domains of health: physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical health, role limitations (RL) due to emotional problems (RE), energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health (GH), where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Enrolment (Visit 0) to Visit 1 (3 months) and to Visit 2 (6 months)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Side effects of the treatment and tolerability
Time Frame: Enrolment (Visit 0) to Visit 1 (3 months) and to Visit 2 (6 months)
The tolerability in this study is based on patient reporting side-effects that developed after taking the medications using a self-administered reporting form. There are no blood or radiological investigation involved to confirm its association with the symptoms.
Enrolment (Visit 0) to Visit 1 (3 months) and to Visit 2 (6 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: ANNA MISYAIL ABDUL RASHID, NEUROLOGIST, UPM

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The individual participant data (IPD) from this study will not be shared to ensure patient confidentiality, as participants did not provide explicit consent for data sharing. Additionally, ethical guidelines, regulatory constraints, and concerns about potential data misuse further limit the feasibility of sharing IPD.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)

Clinical Trials on Bionerv

Subscribe