- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06948877
"Up-Armoring" At-Risk Military Couples: A Stepped Approach to Early Intervention and Strengthening of Military Families
April 21, 2025 updated by: Wright State University
The study tested whether giving young, partnered military service members access to an online relationship help website would help prevent future relationship problems compared to partnered service member who did not have access to the website
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study tested whether access to a self-directed, online couple intervention offered preventively lessened the occurrence of future negative relationship outcomes (i.e., relationship dysfunction, infidelity, intimate partner violence (IPV) for partnered service members in comparison to the usual resources for relationship assistance in the military.
Participants were active-duty military in a committed romantic relationship of at least 6-months duration (N = 581; 37.2% married) who had recently completed basic military training and were transitioning into technical training to learn a specific job skill set.
Participants were randomly assigned by in-processing week to the intervention or the control condition.
The intervention effect was modeled using both Intent to Treat (ITT) and Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) approaches.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
581
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Mississippi
-
Biloxi, Mississippi, United States, 39540
- Keesler Air Force Base
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- To be included in the study, participants had to be: (a) in a committed romantic relationship for at least six months and (b) on active duty (not Guard or Reserve).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants with prior military service (i.e., not new to the military who were retraining into a different career field) were excluded.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
Access to a self-directed, online couple intervention offered preventively
|
The online version of ARMOR comprised three core components.
The first was an MI-based relationship "check-up" with a brief relationship assessment.
In the second component, SMs chose relationship improvement domains from a list of 10 topic areas or modules and watched a short (5-7 minute) video on their chosen area providing (a) evidence-based or evidence-informed psychoeducation, (b) modeling of skills, and (c) practice of the skills.
For the third component, SMs were asked MI's "key question" (i.e., "What's the next step?"
Miller & Rollnick, 2023) and, if desired, completed a planning module where they were given the opportunity to create a personalized action plan (specifying how they might test any planned changes to see if they had the desired impact).
|
|
No Intervention: Control
Usual resources for relationship assistance in the military
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Marital Satisfaction Inventory-Brief (MSI-B; Whisman et al., 2009)
Time Frame: six months
|
The MSI-B is a true-false, self-report measure of relationship distress derived from the full The MSI-B is a true-false, self-report measure of relationship distress derived from the full True-false, self-report measure of relationship distress
|
six months
|
|
Family Maltreatment measure (Heyman et al., 2021)
Time Frame: six months
|
Whether the participant or partner had engaged in intimate partner violence
|
six months
|
|
Infidelity
Time Frame: six months
|
Whether the participant or partner had been intimate with non-partner
|
six months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 19, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 30, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
September 30, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
April 29, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 29, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 21, 2025
Last Verified
April 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- FA8650-17-C-6808
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Military Family
-
University of TulsaCompletedParenting | Military FamilyUnited States
-
University of Texas at AustinNot yet recruitingMilitary FamilyUnited States
-
Memphis VA Medical CenterUnited States Department of DefenseCompletedResilience, Psychological | Family Members | Military Personnel | DeploymentUnited States
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityMount Saint Vincent UniversityCompletedTrauma, Psychological | Military Family | Veterans FamilyCanada
-
University of Southern CaliforniaUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Blue Star Families; Wilcox...CompletedQuality of Life | Communication | Social Skills | Mental Health Disorder | Social Isolation | Military FamilyUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaUnited States Department of DefenseEnrolling by invitationMilitary Activity | Military OperationsUnited States
-
Duquesne UniversityUnited States Department of Defense; University of Pittsburgh; Chatham UniversityCompletedBrain Injuries, Traumatic | Military FamilyUnited States
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedMilitary ActivityIndonesia
-
Investigación en Hemofilia y FisioterapiaCompleted
-
Tel Aviv UniversityTerminatedMilitary Combat PerformanceIsrael
Clinical Trials on ARMOR Online
-
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare SystemUniversity of ArkansasCompletedSarcopenia | ImmunosenescenceUnited States
-
Texas Christian UniversityCompleted
-
Yale-NUS CollegeCompleted
-
University of the PhilippinesPhilippine Dermatological SocietyCompleted
-
Singapore General HospitalDuke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolCompletedDepression | Burnout | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | Psychological Distress | Anxiety Disorders and SymptomsSingapore
-
University of California, San FranciscoGenentech, Inc.CompletedCaregiver | Metastatic Gastrointestinal CarcinomaUnited States
-
VA Palo Alto Health Care SystemUniversity of MelbourneUnknown
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruiting
-
Florida State UniversityCompletedPain, Postoperative | Chronic Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain CatastrophizingUnited States
-
Korean Hemodialysis Study GroupBoryung Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknown