"Up-Armoring" At-Risk Military Couples: A Stepped Approach to Early Intervention and Strengthening of Military Families

April 21, 2025 updated by: Wright State University
The study tested whether giving young, partnered military service members access to an online relationship help website would help prevent future relationship problems compared to partnered service member who did not have access to the website

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study tested whether access to a self-directed, online couple intervention offered preventively lessened the occurrence of future negative relationship outcomes (i.e., relationship dysfunction, infidelity, intimate partner violence (IPV) for partnered service members in comparison to the usual resources for relationship assistance in the military. Participants were active-duty military in a committed romantic relationship of at least 6-months duration (N = 581; 37.2% married) who had recently completed basic military training and were transitioning into technical training to learn a specific job skill set. Participants were randomly assigned by in-processing week to the intervention or the control condition. The intervention effect was modeled using both Intent to Treat (ITT) and Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) approaches.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

581

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Mississippi
      • Biloxi, Mississippi, United States, 39540
        • Keesler Air Force Base

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be included in the study, participants had to be: (a) in a committed romantic relationship for at least six months and (b) on active duty (not Guard or Reserve).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with prior military service (i.e., not new to the military who were retraining into a different career field) were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Access to a self-directed, online couple intervention offered preventively
The online version of ARMOR comprised three core components. The first was an MI-based relationship "check-up" with a brief relationship assessment. In the second component, SMs chose relationship improvement domains from a list of 10 topic areas or modules and watched a short (5-7 minute) video on their chosen area providing (a) evidence-based or evidence-informed psychoeducation, (b) modeling of skills, and (c) practice of the skills. For the third component, SMs were asked MI's "key question" (i.e., "What's the next step?" Miller & Rollnick, 2023) and, if desired, completed a planning module where they were given the opportunity to create a personalized action plan (specifying how they might test any planned changes to see if they had the desired impact).
No Intervention: Control
Usual resources for relationship assistance in the military

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Marital Satisfaction Inventory-Brief (MSI-B; Whisman et al., 2009)
Time Frame: six months
The MSI-B is a true-false, self-report measure of relationship distress derived from the full The MSI-B is a true-false, self-report measure of relationship distress derived from the full True-false, self-report measure of relationship distress
six months
Family Maltreatment measure (Heyman et al., 2021)
Time Frame: six months
Whether the participant or partner had engaged in intimate partner violence
six months
Infidelity
Time Frame: six months
Whether the participant or partner had been intimate with non-partner
six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 19, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FA8650-17-C-6808

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Military Family

Clinical Trials on ARMOR Online

Subscribe