Study to Evaluate the Performance of Navigated TKA With OrthoPilot® pheno4u TKA Level 1 (TKA4U)

November 14, 2025 updated by: Aesculap AG

Prospective, Single-arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Performance of Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the OrthoPilot and the Software pheno4u TKA Level 1

The purpose of this PMCF study is to demonstrate the accuracy of navigation using the new pheno4uTKA Level 1 software for OrthoPilot Elite® and to evaluate its safety and performance.

Patient-related outcome measures (PROM) will be acquired to investigate functional outcome and patient satisfaction.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Šumperk, Czechia, 78701
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Šumperk Hospital Inc.
        • Contact:
          • Ján Debre, Dr.med
        • Contact:
          • Phone Number: +420 583 333
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ján Debre, Dr. med
      • Berlin, Germany, 13086
        • Recruiting
        • Park-Klinik Weißensee
        • Contact:
          • Oliver Hauschild, Prof.Dr.med
          • Phone Number: +49 7531 801
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Oliver Hauschild, Prof. Dr.
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jörg Lützner, Prof. Dr.
        • Contact:
          • Jörg Lützner, Prof. Dr.
          • Phone Number: +49 351 458 150
    • Baden-Wurttemberg
      • Konstanz, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany, 78464
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Klinikum Konstanz GmbH
        • Contact:
          • Gunnar Ochs, Prof.Dr.med
          • Phone Number: +49 7531 801
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gunnar Ochs, Prof. Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients between 18 and 80 years of age having indication for a fixed-bearing total knee endoprosthesis, without retropatellar arthrosis requiring patella resurfacing

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for a TKA with the OrthoPilot® Navigation System with a Aesculap total knee endo-prosthesis
  • Written signed informed consent of patient
  • Willingness and mental ability to participate at the long-term follow-up examinations

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Patients < 18 years or > 80 years
  • Patients unable to participate at the follow-up examination (physically, mentally)
  • Previous joint replacement at the index knee
  • ASA classification > 3 ( ASA I: A healthy patient without systemic diseases. ASA II: A patient with a mild systemic disease that is well controlled (e.g., well-controlled diabetes or hypertension). ASA III: A patient with a severe systemic disease that causes functional limitations (e.g., poorly controlled diabetes, COPD). ASA IV: A patient with a life-threatening systemic disease (e.g., severe heart failure, sepsis). ASA V: A dying patient who is not expected to survive without the operation. ASA VI: A deceased patient whose organs are being removed for donation.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
pheno4u TKA Level 1
Navigation of TKA (Total Knee Arthroplasty) using the new pheno4uTKA Level 1 software for OrthoPilot Elite®.
The OrthoPilot® Software Pheno4u TKA Level 1 is an application software for computer aided navigation of surgical instruments and serves (in combination with compatible hardware and compatible navigated instruments) as an optional aid for the surgeon during the preparation of the implant site for a compatible knee endoprosthesis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the surgical accuracy between the new OrthoPilot Software and the previous OrthoPilot Software
Time Frame: 3 months post OP
The primary variable delta (aHKA), is defined as the difference in the arithmetic hip-knee-angle (aHKA) between the 3 months postoperative and the intraoperatively planned value. The aHKA is calculated as the difference of the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), both measured in degrees.
3 months post OP

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant survival
Time Frame: ongoing, up to 2 years follow-up
Secondary interventions at the index knee
ongoing, up to 2 years follow-up
Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
Time Frame: Preoperative,3 months-, 12 months and 2 years post operative
The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a validated joint-specific patient-reported outcome measure that is commonly employed to assess the outcome of TKA. It is a 12-item, patient-reported questionnaire originally developed and validated specifically to assess function and pain in patients undergoing TKA. It is short, reproducible, valid and sensitive to clinically important changes over time. OKS ranges from 0 to 48 with 48 being the best outcome.
Preoperative,3 months-, 12 months and 2 years post operative
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Time Frame: Preoperative,3 months-, 12 months and 2 years post operative

The FJS-12 contains 12 questions. Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories. Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score.

Final score = 100 - ((sum(item01 to item12) - 12)/48*100). Lower scores indicate less awareness of the operated knee during daily activities. The range of the final score is from 0 to 100 (where 0 is worst and 100 means best score)

Preoperative,3 months-, 12 months and 2 years post operative
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Preoperative, Postoperative 3 Months + /- 6 weeks, Postoperative 12 months + /- 6 weeks, Postoperative 2 year + /- 3 months

Quality of life of the patients will be analyzed using the 5-dimensions 5-level measure of the EuroQol Group (EQ-5D-5L), which is a simple and generic measure for clinical and economic assessment.

The questionnaire covers five different dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities,pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) rated in 5 levels (from "the worst health you can imagine" to "the best health you can imagine"). The questionnaire is filled by the patients themselves.

Preoperative, Postoperative 3 Months + /- 6 weeks, Postoperative 12 months + /- 6 weeks, Postoperative 2 year + /- 3 months
NET Promotor Score (NPS)
Time Frame: Postoperative 3 Months + /- 6 weeks, Postoperative 12 months + /- 6 weeks, Postoperative 2 year + /- 3 months

The Net Promoter Score (NPS) was developed for measuring satisfaction in economic research.

Colloquially, it is referred to as the "friends and family test". In the healthcare sector, the NPS is used as an overarching measure of patient satisfaction. The NPS metric evaluates the likelihood that a patient will recommend the received healthcare service to others. The NPS is assessed using a scale from 1 to 10. A rating between 9 and 10 is classified as a promoter. A rating between 7 and 8 is considered neutral, and a rating between 0 and 6 is deemed a detractor. The overall score is simply calculated by subtracting the percentage of detractors from the percentage of promoters.

Scores range from -100 (everyone is a detractor) to +100 (everyone is a promoter). In the industry, a positive score is viewed favorably, and scores above 50 are considered indicative of strong performance.

Postoperative 3 Months + /- 6 weeks, Postoperative 12 months + /- 6 weeks, Postoperative 2 year + /- 3 months
Anterior knee pain
Time Frame: Preoperative,3 months-, 12 months and 2 years post operative

Anterior knee pain will be used to evaluate the performance of the implantation and the implant itself.

Rating Description Points:

0 = No pain (0 Points) I = Mild pain that does not intrude on daily activities (5 Points) II= Moderate pain that is a nuisance; patient not considering further surgery (10 Points) III= Severe pain; patient considering further surgery (15 Points)

Preoperative,3 months-, 12 months and 2 years post operative
All (Serious) Adverse Events
Time Frame: 2 years
During the course of the study, any upcoming intra- or postoperative (serious) adverse will be documented. The total number of AEs will be summarized and further evaluated by the sponsor and reported according to local legislation and necessity. Recorded complications will be categorized and analyzed to assess the safety of the investigational product.
2 years
Radiological results
Time Frame: Preoperative, Discharge, 1 year post op
Routinely performed radiographic images are used to evaluate the status of the affected knee, preoperatively, and the status of the implant components, postoperatively. Analysis of parameters will be defined in the radiographic protocol, where precise definition of the implant alignment parameter of the tibial and femoral component by measurement of the LDFA (laterale distale Femurankle) and MPTA (medial proximal Tibiaankle) is given. Both ankles have the same unit and are measured in degrees.
Preoperative, Discharge, 1 year post op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jörg Lützner, Prof. Dr., Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Joint Diseases

Clinical Trials on Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

Subscribe