Effect of End-inspiratory Pause on Gas Exchange During Mediastinal Mass Excision With CO2 Insufflation and One-lung Ventilation

April 24, 2025 updated by: Yonsei University

" Mediastinal mass excision is typically performed via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). To secure a clear surgical field, the ipsilateral lung must be deflated, achieved through one-lung ventilation (OLV) and intrathoracic CO₂ insufflation. However, OLV increases intrapulmonary shunt due to continued perfusion of the non-ventilated lung, potentially leading to hypoxemia and hypercapnia.

When performed in the supine position, gas exchange becomes more challenging compared to lateral decubitus due to limited gravitational redistribution of blood flow. Although CO₂ insufflation aids surgical exposure through passive lung deflation, it may also increase CVP and PCWP, reduce cardiac output, and raise PaCO₂, contributing to respiratory acidosis.

End-inspiratory pause (EIP), a ventilatory setting that pauses airflow at end-inspiration, prolongs alveolar gas exchange and improves ventilation-perfusion matching. Prior studies show EIP can enhance gas exchange, reduce microatelectasis, and improve CO₂ clearance in patients with acute lung injury. We therefore aimed to assess the effect of EIP application during VATS mediastinal mass excicion.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 20 to 80 years scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of II (patients with mild systemic disease) or III (patients with severe systemic disease limiting activity).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) according to GOLD criteria: defined as FEV₁/FVC < 0.7 and FEV₁ ≤ 80% of predicted on pulmonary function testing.
  • Diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) < 80% of predicted.
  • History of pneumothorax or presence of bullae or blebs on preoperative imaging.
  • Inability to read or understand the subject information sheet and consent form.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EIP-first group
EIP is applied for 20 minutes immediately after the initiation of one-lung ventilation, followed by conventional mechanical ventilation.
EIP is applied for 20 minutes immediately after the initiation of one-lung ventilation, followed by conventional mechanical ventilation.
Active Comparator: EIP-later group
Conventional mechanical ventilation is applied for 20 minutes after the initiation of one-lung ventilation, followed by EIP application.
Conventional mechanical ventilation is applied for 20 minutes after the initiation of one-lung ventilation, followed by EIP application.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PaCO₂ at 20 minutes after each ventilation method
Time Frame: PaCO₂ is assessed at 20 minutes after each ventilation method
The study aimed to evaluate whether the application of EIP resulted in a significant intergroup difference in PaCO₂.
PaCO₂ is assessed at 20 minutes after each ventilation method

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 10, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 10, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4-2025-0232

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mediastinal Mass Requiring Video-assisted Surgical Excision

Clinical Trials on EIP-first

Subscribe