Hydraulic Pressure Lateral Sinus Lift Approach

May 1, 2025 updated by: Alexandria University

Hydraulic Pressure Sinus Lift Versus Piezoelectric Lift Via Lateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

the study aims to assess the effectiveness of hydraulic pressure sinus lift via lateral wall approach, versus piezoelectric surgery in patients with deficient posterior maxilla.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study involves a randomized clinical trial of 20 participants with less than 6 mm bone height in the posterior maxilla in need of Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation using the lateral window approach. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups; the HPLT Group which include 10 patients who will undergo hydraulic pressure for osteotomy preparation for lateral sinus lifting technique, and the PSLT Group which include 10 patients managed using piezoelectric surgery. Clinical and radiographic assessment of bone augmentation, as well as intraoperative biological complications and postoperative complications were recorded.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21523
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The study included patient with deficient posterior maxilla with less than 6mm of bone height confirmed by a pre-operative tomographic scan. All healthy (ASA I, II) non- smoker patients were eligible for the study. The absence of uncontrolled diabetes, systemic illnesses, sinusitis, immune deficiency disorders, were also required for inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with sinus infection, neoplasm or a large cyst of the sinus, or those who previously underwent a Caldwell-Luc surgery for the same surgical site were excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HPLT Group
patients with posterior deficient maxilla managed with osteotomy for lateral sinus floor augmentation using the Hydraulic Pressure Lifting Technique with A.I drill and hydraulic-powered Aqua-Lifter (OLA system) were assigned to HPLT Group
Hydraulic Pressure Lifting Technique
Experimental: PSLT Group
posterior deficient maxilla managed with osteotomy for lateral sinus floor augmentation using Piezo-Surgical Lifting Technique were assigned to PSLT Group
Piezo-Surgical Lifting Technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
radiographic appraisal of gain in alveolar bone height
Time Frame: 6 months
Postoperative radiographic appraisal was conducted by an immediate postoperative CBCT, followed by other one after 6 postoperative month's. Measurements of the bone height was conducted from the alveolar crest to the floor of the maxillary sinus on a cross-section view of the CBCT (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY). Radiographic assessment of the amount of bone height gain in 6 months period was performed by comparing the bone height measurements between the 6 postoperative months' CBCT with the preoperative scan.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
incidence of membrane perforation
Time Frame: Until the end of the operation
incidence of membrane perforation during the operation was assessed in both groups
Until the end of the operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

all data will be de-identified to protect the participant data. patients signed an informed consent for the use of their medical records and data for study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sinus Lifting

Clinical Trials on Hydraulic Pressure Lifting Technique

Subscribe