- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05032638
Adherence in Upper Extremity Home-based Rehabilitation
October 31, 2022 updated by: NYU Langone Health
Promoting Adherence in Upper Extremity Home-based Rehabilitation Through Motivational Interviewing and Ecological Momentary Assessment
The objective of the proposal is to determine the feasibility of implementing Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) and Motivational Interviewing (MI) methods to enhance adherence for a 4-week self-initiated arm training protocol.
A non-randomized feasibility study using a 4-week UE training protocol will be conducted in 15 individuals within the first 12 months post-stroke living in the community.
EMA data will be collected using a mobile app to automate real-time collection of adherence data on a daily basis.
MI will be used to produce self-generated training plans (training goals, training schedule), guided by the therapist before the start of training.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Using a mixed methods design, the study will collect quantitative data before, during, and after training.
Qualitative data will be collected after the training period and analyzed to explain the quantitative findings in depth, within the context of everyday life.
Study aim 1 is to evaluate the feasibility of using EMA to measure adherence and of applying the MI approach.
Quantitative data will include four indicators of adherence and accuracy.
Interview responses will be used as qualitative data to elucidate participants' acceptance of the MI approach and feedback on using the EMA app.
Study aim 2 is to explore to what extent UE outcomes change after the 4-week self-initiated home-based rehabilitation program.
Outcomes will include UE use in real-world environments and self-perceived changes in UE use.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
15
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- NYU Langone Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults (> 18 years old) diagnosed with stroke at least 6 months ago at the time of screening
- Living in the community
- Have presence of UE motor impairment on the affected side (Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores < 66)
- Availability of mobile technology (tablet or smartphone) with internet connection to use phone app and Zoom videochat)
- Be medically stable
- Able to provide written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently receiving active occupational or physical therapy for the treatment of the affected UE
- Presence of severe cognitive impairment (Mini Mental Status Exam <24)
- Self-reported moderate to severe pain of the affected UE with use
- Presence of unilateral spatial neglect (Star Cancellation Task scores < 44)
- Presence of neurological diagnosis other than stroke.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Experimental Group
Subjects with motor impairment will work closely with an occupational therapist to identify a goal and select activities that they will work on at home to improve the function of their affected arm.
|
Therapist guided period delivered virtually (WebEx/Zoom).
Participants will be patients associated with NYULH and will have access to Zoom.
Each session will last 45 min, and will completed 3x/week by research therapists, who are part of the study.
The 4-week UE training is completed in the participants home on their own and communication with study staff is virtual.
Participants will receive daily communication through the Expiwell app to answer survey questions related to adherence, and safety/adverse events.
Participants will also complete weekly check-ins with their research therapist over Zoom to answer questions about difficulties related to UE training activities, refinement of training goals, and to receive feedback on their training performance.
Each weekly check-in will be approximately 45 minutes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Time Frame: Day 4 visit
|
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
|
Day 4 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Time Frame: Day 6 visit
|
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
|
Day 6 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Time Frame: Day 8 visit
|
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
|
Day 8 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Time Frame: Day 11 visit
|
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
|
Day 11 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Time Frame: Day 22 visit
|
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
|
Day 22 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Time Frame: Day 29 visit
|
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
|
Day 29 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Time Frame: Day 37 visit
|
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
|
Day 37 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through frequency
Time Frame: Day 39 visit
|
Frequency will be calculated by dividing the number of sessions completed by the total number of sessions available for 4-week period
|
Day 39 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Time Frame: Day 4 visit
|
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
|
Day 4 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Time Frame: Day 6 visit
|
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
|
Day 6 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Time Frame: Day 8 visit
|
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
|
Day 8 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Time Frame: Day 11 visit
|
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
|
Day 11 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Time Frame: Day 22 visit
|
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
|
Day 22 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Time Frame: Day 29 visit
|
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
|
Day 29 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Time Frame: Day 37 visit
|
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
|
Day 37 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through intensity
Time Frame: Day 39 visit
|
Intensity data will be collected using a 3-point ordinal ratings scale to determine perceived intensity of practice for each session (mild- moderate- intense).
|
Day 39 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Time Frame: Day 4 visit
|
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
|
Day 4 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Time Frame: Day 6 visit
|
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
|
Day 6 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Time Frame: Day 8 visit
|
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
|
Day 8 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Time Frame: Day 11 visit
|
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
|
Day 11 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Time Frame: Day 22 visit
|
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
|
Day 22 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Time Frame: Day 29 visit
|
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
|
Day 29 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Time Frame: Day 37 visit
|
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
|
Day 37 visit
|
Rates of adherence at individual and group level measured through duration
Time Frame: Day 39 visit
|
Duration data will be collected using open end responses to report total number of minutes of UE training completed that day
|
Day 39 visit
|
Decision making factors effecting the program adherence through semi-structured interviews
Time Frame: Day 39 visit
|
Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with all participants to collect qualitative data on participants' experiences related to the shared decision-making process in phase 1, and adherence to arm training in phase 2 of study.
|
Day 39 visit
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change scores in Fugl-Meyer Assessment from baseline to discharge and baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
|
FMA is a valid and reliable UE assessment to measure motor impairment in stroke.
It consists of 33 items reflecting typical shoulder and hand motions in and out of synergy patterns characteristic of motor recovery after stroke.
It is the gold standard performance-based assessment in UE stroke rehabilitation with an established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 4.25-7.25 points for chronic stroke patients.
|
Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
|
Change scores in Motor Activity Log from baseline to discharge and baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
|
Motor Activity Log (MAL) is a valid and reliable self-report questionnaire for individuals in the subacute and chronic phase after stroke.
Originally created as the primary outcome for Constraint Induced Movement Therapy, the MAL captures spontaneous use of the affected UE in daily life.
It consists of 28 items reflecting basic and instrumental activities of daily living items.
Scoring is based on an ordinal scale ranging from 1-5, and final scores are determined by calculating the mean of all item scores.
This study will use the amount of use subscale for this study.
|
Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
|
Change scores in Canadian Occupational Performance Measure from baseline to discharge and baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
|
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a valid and reliable individualized self-report measure that quantifies a participants' perception of everyday performance.
Participants rate their change in their performance and satisfaction on a scale of 1 (unable to perform/not satisfied) to 10 (able to perform, extremely satisfied).
A change of two or more points is considered clinically significant.
|
Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
|
Change scores in UE accelerometry data calculated using bilateral magnitude ratio from baseline to discharge and baseline to follow-up.
Time Frame: Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
|
Wrist worn accelerometers can be used to provide objective, valid, and reliable data on general UE motion in home settings.
As a secondary outcome for adherence, we will collect bilateral UE accelerometry data continuously for 24 hours at all timepoints to determine if there are any changes in UE motion of the affected side in relation to the unaffected side before and after the intervention.
Commercially available Actigraph GT9X Link wrist sensors will be used to collect bilateral UE motion at baseline, discharge, and follow up.
|
Day 4 visit, Day 37-39 visit, Day 65-67 visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Grace Kim, MD, NYU Langone Health
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 22, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 24, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
October 24, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 31, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
September 2, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 1, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 31, 2022
Last Verified
October 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21-00513
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.The investigator who proposed to use the data.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Upon reasonable request.
Requests should be directed to gjk207@nyu.edu.
To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, CryptogenicSingapore, Philippines
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of Alabama at BirminghamEnrolling by invitationStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Engagement, Patient | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaAmerican Occupational Therapy FoundationRecruitingStroke | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke IschemicUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Michael Smith Foundation for...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Chronic StrokeCanada
-
University of CincinnatiMedical University of South Carolina; University of California, Los Angeles; University...RecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke HemorrhagicUnited States
-
University of LiegeCompletedStroke, Acute | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, ComplicationBelgium
Clinical Trials on Therapist guided training
-
Karolinska InstitutetRegion StockholmCompletedInsomnia | Major Depression | Minor DepressionSweden
-
Rush University Medical CenterCompleted
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Children's Hospital Colorado; Nationwide... and other collaboratorsCompletedWounds and Injuries | Brain Injuries | Craniocerebral Trauma | Trauma, Nervous System | Brain Concussion | Head Injuries, Closed | Head Injury | Brain Edema | Disorders of Environmental Origin | Brain Hemorrhage, Traumatic | Subdural Hematoma | Epidural Hematoma | Intracranial Edema | Tbi | Cortical ContusionUnited States
-
University of AlbertaCompletedSpastic DiplegiaCanada
-
Ruya Gul TemelCompletedCerebral PalsyTurkey
-
University of Texas at AustinCompletedDepressive SymptomsUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalKoa Health B.V.Completed
-
Karolinska InstitutetRegion StockholmCompleted
-
Ohio State UniversitySuspendedAutism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
Sultan Qaboos UniversityThe Research Council; Oman Medical Specialty BoardUnknownDepressive Symptoms | Generalized Anxiety