Linezolid Plus Standard of Care (LIPS)

March 19, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Combination Antibiotic Treatment With Linezolid for Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteraemia: a Randomised Controlled Trial

The aim of the study is to assess whether targeting virulence factors by administering linezolid in addition to standard antibiotic treatment improves outcomes in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the deadliest bacterial pathogens, especially in high-income countries, and causes bloodstream infections (bacteraemia) in 20-30 per 100,000 people annually. Despite widely available antibiotic treatments, the 90-day mortality rate remains high at 20-30%, and complications such as organ damage, relapses, and long-term impairment affect many survivors. Existing treatments have failed to improve survival rates highlighting the urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies.

Virulence factors produced by S. aureus facilitate bacterial persistence and spread, and tissue damage. Preclinical research suggests that inhibiting the production of virulence factors may improve patient outcomes. While some clinical guidelines recommend this approach for toxin-mediated infections, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating this approach in S. aureus bacteraemia have not yet been conducted.

Linezolid, an antibiotic commonly used for pneumonia and complicated skin and soft-tissue infections, has shown strong inhibition of the expression of S. aureus virulence factors in preclinical studies. Studies in animal models demonstrated that linezolid, when combined with other antibiotics, enhances treatment efficacy and reduces bacterial toxin production. Observational studies suggest that early initiation of linezolid may lead to better patient outcomes, but no RCT has tested this approach in S. aureus bacteraemia.

This placebo-controlled trial will evaluate whether adding a 5-day course of linezolid to standard antibiotic therapy improves clinical outcomes in patients with S. aureus bacteraemia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

606

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Basel (USB)
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Richard Kühl, PD Dr. med.
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Inselspital Bern
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christine Thurnheer, PD Dr. med.
      • Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
        • Not yet recruiting
        • HOCH Health Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St.Gallen
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Werner Albrich, Prof. Dr. med.
      • Zurich, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsspital Zürich (USZ)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Barbara Hasse, Prof. Dr. med.
      • Zurich, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Stadtspital Zürich Triemli
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adrian Schibli, Dr. med.
    • Canton Ticino
      • Lugano, Canton Ticino, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marco Bongiovanni, PD Dr. med.
    • Canton of Aargau
      • Aarau, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • Kantonsspital Aarau (KSA)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anna Conen, PD Dr. med. MSc.
    • Canton of Basel-City
      • Basel, Canton of Basel-City, Switzerland
        • Recruiting
        • St. Claraspital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elisabeth Wehrle-Wieland, Dr. med.
    • Canton of Geneva
      • Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (HUG)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephan Harbarth, Prof. Dr. med.
    • Canton of Jura
      • Delémont, Canton of Jura, Switzerland
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital du Jura
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michèle Birrer, Dre
    • Canton of Vaud
      • Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, PD Dr. med. PhD
    • Canton of Zurich
      • Winterthur, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Kantonsspital Winterthur (KSW)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Urs Karrer, PD Dr. med.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) grown from at least one blood culture
  • Hospitalised at a participating centre
  • ≥18 years old
  • Written informed consent or fulfilling criteria for an emergency exception from informed consent requirements

Exclusion criteria:

  • Administration of the initial drug treatment not feasible within 72 hours since the collection of the first positive blood culture with S. aureus
  • Documented history of positive blood cultures for S. aureus occurring between 72 hours and 180 days prior to the eligibility assessment
  • Necrotising fasciitis
  • Currently receiving linezolid or clindamycin
  • Use of any monoamine oxidase A or B inhibitor within the last two weeks
  • Known hypersensitivity to linezolid or any other ingredients of the study drugs
  • Current severe thrombocytopenia (i.e. <30 x 10^9/L)
  • Application of study drug not possible (per mouth or per gastric tube)
  • Currently breastfeeding
  • Local treating team believes that death is imminent and inevitable
  • Patient is receiving end of life care and antibiotic treatment is not considered appropriate
  • Local treating team believes that participation in the study is not in the best interest of the patient
  • Any indication that the patient is unwilling to participate in the study including an advance directive stating such unwillingness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Linezolid
600mg twice a day for 5 days (in addition to the standard antibiotic treatment)
linezolid 600 mg tablets (twice a day for 5 days)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
oral placebo tablets twice a day for 5 days (in addition to the standard antibiotic treatment)
Placebo tablets (twice a day for 5 days)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR)
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90

The hierarchical composite endpoint DOOR will be calculated based on the following 4 criteria:

  1. Alive at 90 days
  2. Return to usual level of function by day 90
  3. None of the following complications: Microbiological or clinical failure leading to treatment change; Serious adverse reaction; Adverse event leading to study drug discontinuation
  4. Hospital length of stay

The primary outcome will be expressed as the win ratio, i.e., the ratio of the number of times that participants in the intervention group have a lower DOOR compared to those in the control group.

In this study, a pairwise comparison is used, i.e., every participant in the linezolid group is compared with every participant in the control group. When comparing two participants, the winner will be determined by the first component of the DOOR in which the two participants differ, the only exceptions being ties when both participants die or if they do not die but have the same length of hospitalisation.

From randomisation (day 1) until day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Proportion of patients who died from any cause during the duration of the study.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Time to death
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Level of function
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Proportion of participants back to their usual level of function prior to the infection.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Number of participants with microbiological failure leading to treatment change
Time Frame: From day 14 to day 90 (randomisation = day 1)
Any positive sterile site culture with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) between 14 and 90 days after randomisation that leads to a change in treatment. A sterile site means any site of the body where microorganisms are usually absent, i.e. below the outer and inner colonised surfaces of the skin and mucous membranes. Positive sterile sites cultures include deep visceral and musculoskeletal abscesses obtained in a sterile manner.
From day 14 to day 90 (randomisation = day 1)
Number of participants with early microbiological failure leading to treatment change
Time Frame: From day 5 to day 13 (randomisation = day 1)
Any positive sterile site culture with S. aureus between 5 and 13 days after randomisation that leads to a change in treatment. A sterile site means any site of the body where microorganisms are usually absent, i.e. below the outer and inner colonised surfaces of the skin and mucous membranes. Positive sterile sites cultures include deep visceral and musculoskeletal abscesses obtained in a sterile manner.
From day 5 to day 13 (randomisation = day 1)
Number of participants with clinical failure leading to treatment change
Time Frame: From day 14 to day 90 (randomisation = day 1)
Newly identified focus of S. aureus between 14 and 90 days after randomisation as determined by the site investigator (or delegated physician) that leads to a change in treatment. This can incorporate clinical, radiological, microbiological and pathological findings.
From day 14 to day 90 (randomisation = day 1)
Number of participants with early clinical failure leading to treatment change
Time Frame: From day 5 to day 13 (randomisation = day 1)
Newly identified focus of S. aureus between 5 and 13 days after randomisation as determined by the site investigator (or delegated physician) that leads to a change in treatment. This can incorporate clinical, radiological, microbiological and pathological findings.
From day 5 to day 13 (randomisation = day 1)
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Duration of the index acute hospital stay from randomisation until the day of hospital discharge. Transfers to another acute care hospital for continuation of acute treatment will be included in the assessment of hospital length of stay. Days after transfer to rehabilitation centres or switch to outpatient parenteral ambulatory treatment will not be included in the acute hospital stay.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Time to being discharged alive
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
For participants who die during the hospitalisation, 90 days will be recorded.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Days alive without being on the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Number of days a participant is alive and not hospitalised in the Intensive Care Unit.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Days alive without antibiotics
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Number of days a participant is alive and not on any antibiotics.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Physical health
Time Frame: At day 90 (randomisation = day 1)
Physical health assessed by patient-reported outcome using SF-36 questionnaire. The SF-36 questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health.
At day 90 (randomisation = day 1)
Number of participants with persistent bacteraemia
Time Frame: At day 5 (randomisation = day 1)
S. aureus-positive blood culture on day 5 (±1 day) after randomisation. If day 2 or day 3 blood cultures are negative and no subsequent blood cultures are performed, the day 5 blood culture is presumed to be negative.
At day 5 (randomisation = day 1)
Two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria fulfilled
Time Frame: At day 5 (randomisation = day 1)

SIRS criteria:

  • Abnormal body temperature (<36°C or >38°C)
  • tachypnoea or mechanical ventilation (RR>20 breaths per minute)
  • tachycardia (HR >90 beats per minute in an adult
  • abnormal leukocyte count (from routine blood sampling on day 5 ±1 day, defined as >12.0 x 10^9/L or <4.0 x 10^9/L or >10% of immature (band) forms)
At day 5 (randomisation = day 1)
Change in C-reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 5
Day 1 CRP means any blood CRP measurement taken on randomisation day 1 or the calendar day prior to randomisation. If there is more than one measurement, the value recorded is the one taken closest before randomisation.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 5
Development of new antibiotic drug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Any new resistance absent in the S. aureus from the initial blood culture and detected in any S. aureus cultured after the start of the intervention.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 5
Any adverse event (irrespective of grade) leading to study drug discontinuation as documented by the treating physician.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 5
Serious adverse reactions until day 90
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Any serious adverse event will be reported to the study-site principal investigator, who then assesses whether there is a reasonable causal relationship with the investigational medicinal product.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Clinical signs of serotonin toxicity
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 7
Assessed using the Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 7
Laboratory signs of myelosuppression
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 7
Laboratory confirmation of thrombocytopenia, anaemia, or leukopenia.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 7
Evidence of hyperlactatemia
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 7
In case of clinical suspicion of hyperlactatemia, lactate levels will be measured and compared to specific laboratory-defined reference ranges. For increased lactate levels, the causality with the study treatment will be assessed.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 7
Acute kidney injury
Time Frame: From randomisation until day 14
Assessed on day 5 and, if participant remains hospitalised, on day 14, using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definition.
From randomisation until day 14
Number of participants with Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile)-associated diarrhoea
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
This means a stool submitted to a clinical laboratory has tested positive for C. difficile toxin or toxin gene.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90
Mental health
Time Frame: At day 90 (randomisation = day 1)
Mental health assessed by patient-reported outcome using Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. The SF-36 questionnaire score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health.
At day 90 (randomisation = day 1)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Linezolid trough plasma concentrations at day 4 or 5
Time Frame: At day 5 (day of randomisation = day 1)
Additional exploratory laboratory outcome for a subset of participants only in participating centres (results may be reported in a publication separate from the publication of the main study results).
At day 5 (day of randomisation = day 1)
Molecular mechanisms of S. aureus bacteraemia
Time Frame: From randomisation (day 1) until day 90 or until the date of the participant's first blood culture negative for S. aureus, whichever came first.
Basic research on the location of S. aureus in human blood (extracellular or intracellular). This will be conducted in a sub-sample of participants consenting to additional blood sampling and published separately from the publication of the main study results.
From randomisation (day 1) until day 90 or until the date of the participant's first blood culture negative for S. aureus, whichever came first.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin Speich, PD, PhD, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
  • Principal Investigator: Richard Kühl, PD Dr. med., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
  • Principal Investigator: Nina Khanna, Prof. Dr. med., University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After publication of the main results, the full dataset will be submitted to the Data Access Committee of the Faculty of Medicine (MF-DAC) at the University of Basel. Other researchers interested in using the study data may contact the independent MF-DAC of the University of Basel to request access.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

A detailed statistical analysis plan will be finalised before database lock. The statistical analysis plan will be made publicly available on clinicaltrials.gov.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infections (BSI; Bacteremia)

Clinical Trials on Linezolid 600 mg

Subscribe