Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Ultrasonic Activated Irrigation Versus Non Activated Irrigation in Pulpectomy of Necrotic Primary Molars : A Randomized Clinical Trial

June 13, 2025 updated by: Naira Essam Farouk, Cairo University
This is a Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Canal Irrigation Using Ultrasonically Activated vs. Non-Activated Irrigants in Pulpectomy of Necrotic Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial" This study aims to compare the effectiveness of using ultrasonically activated irrigant versus non-activated irrigant in terms of clinical and radiographic success rates in the pulpectomy of necrotic primary molars, through a randomized clinical trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary teeth are considered of great importance to children allowing their normal, healthy development and growth while preserving function, eating, speech and normal development of occlusion while preserving the space for permanent dentition and guide their eruption.

Pulpectomy of primary molar teeth is considered as reasonable treatment approach to ensure either normal shedding or long term survival of 1ry teeth as fully functional component in dental arch.

Treatment of necrotic primary teeth is complex due to anatomical and physiological characteristics and high no. of bacterial species present in endodontic infection.

Treatment success depend on the elimination of root canal infection which can be done mechanically and chemically to ensure the complete removal of bacterial canal infection.

Irrigation is a key part of successful root canal treatment. It has several important functions, the most important one that it has a washing effect and an antimicrobial/antibiofilm effect. Irrigation is also the only way to impact those areas of the root canal wall not touched by mechanical instrumentation.

Ultrasonic activation cause irrigant streaming and cavitation phenomena resulting in significantly improved debridement of canal spaces, disruption of biofilm and improved penetration of irrigant into dentinal tubules and reduces bacterial level improving prognosis and ability to seal.

This study has been conducted by only few researchers, and there is limited evidence supporting the effect of ultrasonic activation on irrigation.

So this study is conducted to compare the effect of ultrasonic activation of irrigation on success of pulpectomy versus that of non-activated irrigation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

-

Clinical Criteria:

  1. Children aged between 4 to 7 years' old
  2. Children with deep caries involving pulp in primary molars
  3. History of abscess, swelling or pus
  4. Pain on percussion
  5. Mobility grade 1

Radiographic criteria:

  1. Root resorption due to abscess less that ⅔ of root
  2. Periapical RL or furcation RL
  3. Widening in PDL space or loss of lamina dura continuity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical criteria: -

    1. Refusal of participation.
    2. Patient unable to attend to follow up
    3. Non-restorable tooth.
    4. Medically compromised patient.
    5. Uncooperative patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group 1
Ultrasonic activated sodium hypochlorite
Using ultrasonic-activated sodium hypochlorite in the canals of primary molars can significantly enhance root canal disinfection by improving the irrigant's penetration and effectiveness. Primary molars often have complex and irregular canal anatomies, which can limit the reach of traditional irrigation methods. Ultrasonic activation creates acoustic streaming and cavitation effects, allowing sodium hypochlorite to better dissolve organic tissue and disrupt bacterial biofilms, especially in hard-to-reach areas. This leads to more thorough cleaning, reduced microbial load, and potentially better clinical outcomes in pediatric endodontics
Experimental: Intervention group 2
Ultrasonic activated saline
using ultrasonic-activated saline within the canals of primary teeth lies in its ability to enhance mechanical debridement and improve irrigation effectiveness without the risks associated with stronger chemical agents. Although saline lacks inherent antimicrobial properties, ultrasonic activation generates acoustic streaming and cavitation, which help dislodge debris, disrupt biofilms, and clean intricate canal anatomy more efficiently than passive irrigation. This makes it a safer alternative in pediatric patients, minimizing the risk of cytotoxic effects or damage to developing permanent tooth buds while still improving cleaning outcomes.
Experimental: Intervention group 3
Sodium hypochlorite
using sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) within the canals of primary molars is its excellent antimicrobial and tissue-dissolving properties, which are essential for effective root canal disinfection. Primary molars often have complex and irregular canal systems that harbor bacteria and necrotic tissue. Sodium hypochlorite not only helps eliminate a broad spectrum of microorganisms but also dissolves organic debris, improving canal cleanliness and reducing the risk of post-treatment infection. When used in appropriate concentrations, it can significantly enhance the success of pulpectomy procedures in pediatric patients while maintaining safety.
Active Comparator: Control group 4
Saline
Saline is commonly used as an irrigant in the root canal treatment of primary molars due to its excellent biocompatibility and safety profile. It is a non-toxic, isotonic solution that poses no risk to the surrounding periapical tissues, which is particularly important in primary teeth where root resorption and open apices are common. This minimizes the chance of damaging the underlying permanent tooth germ, a critical consideration in pediatric dentistry. Saline is also safe if accidentally extruded beyond the apex or ingested, making it a suitable choice for young children.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post operative pain
Time Frame: 6 months
Post operative pain assessments will be clinically , binary yes or no oral from patients word
6 months
Soft tissue pathology
Time Frame: 6 months
This outcome will be measured clinically , binary yes or no by visual inspection
6 months
Pain on percussion
Time Frame: 6 months
Will measured clinically , binary yes or no using back of mirror for percussion assessment
6 months
Pathological mobility
Time Frame: 6 months
Will be assessed clinically , binary by yes or no using back of mirror and finger of one hand to check mobility
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Furcation or periapical pathology
Time Frame: 6 months
Will be measured clinically by periapical radiograph binary yes or no the presence of Radiolucency
6 months
External or internal root resorption
Time Frame: 6 months
Will be assessed by radiograph binary yes or no checking radiolucency
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • dentistry Cairo university

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulpectomy Agents

Clinical Trials on Ultrasonic activated sodium hypochlorite

Subscribe