- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07086885
- Original Trial
Strength Training Intervention for Hybrid Workers
July 25, 2025 updated by: Gemma Ryde, University of Glasgow
Strength Training Intervention for Hybrid Workers: A Randomised Pilot Feasibility Trial
What Is This Study About? To find out if a short, easy-to-do resistance band workout can help people who work both at home and in the office feel stronger, less stressed, and more productive.
What Can Be learnt?
- Can doing resistance band exercises make people physically stronger?
- Can it help reduce stress and improve how well people work? How Will the Study Work?
Two groups will be compared:
- One group will do resistance band exercises.
- The other group won't change anything in their routine. What Will Participants Do?
- A 15-minute resistance band workout three times a week for four weeks
- Complete a short strength test and survey before and after the 4 weeks
- Send in a weekly training diary by email
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
50
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Glasgow, United Kingdom, G12 8QQ
- University of Glasgow
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- working from home in the United Kingdom
- working from home 3 or more days per week
- performing less than 2 days per week of muscle strengthening exercise
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not working from home
- Working outside the United Kingdom
- performing more than 2 days per week of muscle strengthening exercise
- on holiday during the study
- answered yes to any of the questions in the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control
Usual routine
|
|
|
Experimental: Resistance band training
|
Four-week resistance band training intervention (15 mins 3x per week).
Written and video instructions on the exercises were provided inlcuding guidance on increasing resistance over the weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sit to stand
Time Frame: at baselines and then one week after the intervention ended
|
Number of sit to stands in 30 seconds - Higher score are positive
|
at baselines and then one week after the intervention ended
|
|
Push-up
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention
|
Number of push ups in 30 seconds - Higher scores are positive
|
Baseline and one week after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Stress
Time Frame: Baselines until one week after the intervention
|
Perceived stress was measured using the 10 item Cohen-Perceived Stress Scale.
This instrument is designed to measure psychological stress and to evaluate the stressful situations of daily life by measuring the degree an individual feels their life has been unpredictable, uncontrollable and overloaded during the past month.
Questions were rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from never (0) to almost always (4) with the ratings for each question summed to create an overall stress score.
Higher scores indicate more perceived stress with the possible range of summed scores ranging from zero to 40.
Scores of 13 are classified as average stress levels and scores of 20 or above indicate high stress levels.
|
Baselines until one week after the intervention
|
|
Productivity
Time Frame: Baselines until one week after the intervention
|
The Health and Work Questionnaire (HWQ) measures employee productivity and health.
The survey consists of 24 questions (3 with sub-questions) used to create an overall HWQ score and six subscales; productivity, concentration/focus, supervisor relations, impatience/irritability, work satisfaction, and non-work satisfaction.
Questions are rated on a 10-point Likert scale from a negative rating (1) to a positive rating (10).
Scores for each subscale are calculated from the sum of responses to all the items comprising the subscale divided by the number of items in the subscale.
An overall HWQ score is produced from the average of all six subscales.
Scores closer to 10 indicate desirable productivity outcomes.
|
Baselines until one week after the intervention
|
|
Work engagement
Time Frame: Baselines until one week after the intervention
|
The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) measures work engagement, which can be described as the opposite of burnout.
The UWES-17 consists of 17 statements used to create an overall engagement score and three subscales: vigor, absorption, and dedication.
Statements are rated on a 7-point Likert scale from never had this feeling (0) to always every day (6).
Scores for each subscale are calculated from the sum of responses to all the items within that subscale, divided by the number of items in the subscale.
An overall engagement score is produced from the average of all 17 subscales.
Normative scores range from very low to very high, with very low scores for vigor, dedication, absorption and total engagement reported as ≤2.17, ≤1.60, ≤1.60 and ≤1.93, respectively, and very high scores reported as ≥5.61, ≥5.80, ≥5.36 and ≥5.54, respectively.
|
Baselines until one week after the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 3, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 17, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
July 17, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 18, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
July 25, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 30, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 25, 2025
Last Verified
July 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 200210134
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Annonymised participant data will be made available by the author upon request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data and study protocol will be made available as part of publication.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stress
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedStress | Emotional Stress | Psychological Stress | Social Stress | Life StressUnited States
-
Center for Advanced Facial Plastic SurgeryCompletedStress | Stress, Physiological | Stress Response | Stress (Psychology) | Healthy Adult Female Participants | Stress, Psychologic | Stress Perception | Stress Levels | Stress, Psychological CumulativeUnited States
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcRigshospitalet, Denmark; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfNot yet recruitingStress | Stress and Burnout | Stress BiomarkersGermany, Denmark
-
University of California, Los AngelesUniversity of California, San Francisco; Stanford University; California Initiative...CompletedStress | Stress, Psychological | Stress, Emotional | Stress, Physiological | Stress ReactionUnited States
-
Amasya UniversityCompletedThe Effect of Online Stress Management Program on Nurses' Individual Workload Perception, and StressStress | Nursing | Stress ManagementTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Canterbury Christ Church UniversitySussex Partnership NHS Foundation TrustEnrolling by invitationOccupational Stress or Workplace StressUnited Kingdom
-
University of PadovaCompletedStress | Stress Disorder | Work Related StressItaly
-
University of Thi-QarCompletedPsychological Stress | Academic StressIraq
-
University of Auckland, New ZealandNot yet recruiting
-
K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies...Active, not recruitingStress | Stress (Psychology)Russia
Clinical Trials on Resistance band training
-
Beijing Sport UniversityNot yet recruitingRespiration DisordersChina
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesNot yet recruiting
-
China Medical University HospitalCompleted
-
Lou QingqingCompleted
-
Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial HospitalUnknown
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Khyber Medical University PeshawarCompleted
-
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical...CompletedBody Weight Changes | Sarcopenia | Prader Labhart Willi SyndromeTaiwan
-
University of MichiganEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
-
Zhejiang Rongjun HospitalCompleted