Strength Training Intervention for Hybrid Workers

July 25, 2025 updated by: Gemma Ryde, University of Glasgow

Strength Training Intervention for Hybrid Workers: A Randomised Pilot Feasibility Trial

What Is This Study About? To find out if a short, easy-to-do resistance band workout can help people who work both at home and in the office feel stronger, less stressed, and more productive.

What Can Be learnt?

  • Can doing resistance band exercises make people physically stronger?
  • Can it help reduce stress and improve how well people work? How Will the Study Work?

Two groups will be compared:

  • One group will do resistance band exercises.
  • The other group won't change anything in their routine. What Will Participants Do?
  • A 15-minute resistance band workout three times a week for four weeks
  • Complete a short strength test and survey before and after the 4 weeks
  • Send in a weekly training diary by email

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Glasgow, United Kingdom, G12 8QQ
        • University of Glasgow

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • working from home in the United Kingdom
  • working from home 3 or more days per week
  • performing less than 2 days per week of muscle strengthening exercise

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not working from home
  • Working outside the United Kingdom
  • performing more than 2 days per week of muscle strengthening exercise
  • on holiday during the study
  • answered yes to any of the questions in the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Usual routine
Experimental: Resistance band training
Four-week resistance band training intervention (15 mins 3x per week). Written and video instructions on the exercises were provided inlcuding guidance on increasing resistance over the weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sit to stand
Time Frame: at baselines and then one week after the intervention ended
Number of sit to stands in 30 seconds - Higher score are positive
at baselines and then one week after the intervention ended
Push-up
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention
Number of push ups in 30 seconds - Higher scores are positive
Baseline and one week after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stress
Time Frame: Baselines until one week after the intervention
Perceived stress was measured using the 10 item Cohen-Perceived Stress Scale. This instrument is designed to measure psychological stress and to evaluate the stressful situations of daily life by measuring the degree an individual feels their life has been unpredictable, uncontrollable and overloaded during the past month. Questions were rated on a five-point Likert scale ranging from never (0) to almost always (4) with the ratings for each question summed to create an overall stress score. Higher scores indicate more perceived stress with the possible range of summed scores ranging from zero to 40. Scores of 13 are classified as average stress levels and scores of 20 or above indicate high stress levels.
Baselines until one week after the intervention
Productivity
Time Frame: Baselines until one week after the intervention
The Health and Work Questionnaire (HWQ) measures employee productivity and health. The survey consists of 24 questions (3 with sub-questions) used to create an overall HWQ score and six subscales; productivity, concentration/focus, supervisor relations, impatience/irritability, work satisfaction, and non-work satisfaction. Questions are rated on a 10-point Likert scale from a negative rating (1) to a positive rating (10). Scores for each subscale are calculated from the sum of responses to all the items comprising the subscale divided by the number of items in the subscale. An overall HWQ score is produced from the average of all six subscales. Scores closer to 10 indicate desirable productivity outcomes.
Baselines until one week after the intervention
Work engagement
Time Frame: Baselines until one week after the intervention
The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) measures work engagement, which can be described as the opposite of burnout. The UWES-17 consists of 17 statements used to create an overall engagement score and three subscales: vigor, absorption, and dedication. Statements are rated on a 7-point Likert scale from never had this feeling (0) to always every day (6). Scores for each subscale are calculated from the sum of responses to all the items within that subscale, divided by the number of items in the subscale. An overall engagement score is produced from the average of all 17 subscales. Normative scores range from very low to very high, with very low scores for vigor, dedication, absorption and total engagement reported as ≤2.17, ≤1.60, ≤1.60 and ≤1.93, respectively, and very high scores reported as ≥5.61, ≥5.80, ≥5.36 and ≥5.54, respectively.
Baselines until one week after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 17, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 17, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Annonymised participant data will be made available by the author upon request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data and study protocol will be made available as part of publication.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Resistance band training

3
Subscribe