High Cardiovascular Risk Intervention With Cardio-Oncology Consultation for Prostate Cancer Following Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor (ARPI) Therapy (Heart-Safe)

May 1, 2026 updated by: Katelyn Atkins, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

In patients with prostate cancer (PC), cardiovascular disease (CVD) causes significant morbidity and is the second leading cause of death. Both pre-existing CVD and the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-a key cornerstone of treatment for men with locally advanced or metastatic PC1,2 contribute to increased CV risk. ADT has been associated with adverse metabolic effects, including increased central adiposity, elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels, impaired glycemic control, and arterial wall remodeling and endothelial dysfunction

The data demonstrates that for most patients, the status quo is insufficient6 and there remains a critical gap in the early identification of high CV-risk PC patients who may benefit most from aggressive risk mitigation strategies. Mitigation strategies, like the addition of statins as primary prevention, have shown decrease in MI/CHD death across thousands of patients. Age-related expansion of hematopoietic clones carrying recurrent somatic mutations, termed clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) has recently been identified as a significant driver of atherosclerosis, doubling the risk of coronary heart disease. Notably, while CHIP is detectable in ~10% of persons over 70 years old, it is enriched in patients with solid malignancies, and radiotherapy exposure is among the most decisive risk factors for developing CHIP12-15. The inflammation-related metabolic signals are activated androgen signaling and exacerbated in patients with CHIP. However, the mechanistic link and clinical consequence are less understood. Therefore, it is critical to study the CV impact of CHIP and metabolic perturbations in patients with PC treated with ARSI therapy.

We plan to address these critical gaps by testing our innovative hypothesis that early cardio-oncology intervention with aggressive guidelines-based CV optimization during ARPI therapy will reduce CV risk and that CHIP and metabolomics will help identify adverse metabolic remodeling to improve CV risk prediction.

Robust epidemiological and clinical trial data consistently demonstrate that patients with PC are poorly optimized from a CV risk modification perspective, and existing CV risk models do not perform well in patients with cancer. The data demonstrates that for most patients, the status quo is insufficient and there remains a critical gap in the early identification of high CV-risk PC patients who may benefit most from aggressive risk mitigation strategies.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars Sinai Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Leslie Ballas, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Katelyn Atkins, MD, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Prostate cancer with localized, very-high risk, lymph-node positive, and/or metastatic (Stage IV) disease.
  • Being treated with ARPI therapy with intended duration ≥ 18 months.
  • Age > 65 years old and at least one CV risk factor, or age 45-65 years with at least two CV risk factors:

    • Hypertension
    • Hyperlipidemia
    • Diabetes mellitus
    • Family history of early CAD (male first-degree relative (father or brother) with CAD before age 55; female first-degree relative (mother or sister) with CAD before age 65)
    • Presence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) on chest CT imaging
  • ECOG 0-2
  • Written informed consent obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior ARPI therapy exposure > 6 months duration.
  • Established care with cardio-oncologist (cardiologist with expertise in CV risks of cancer and cardiotoxic cancer therapies).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cardo-Oncolody Referral
Referral to cardio-oncology for guidelines-based personalized cardio-oncology management
Referral to cardio-oncology for guidelines-based personalized cardio-oncology management
Active Comparator: PCP/General Cardiology Care
Notification to patient's primary care physician and/or general cardiologist and recommendation for CV risk optimization after initiation of ARPI therapy
Notification to patient's primary care physician and/or general cardiologist and recommendation for CV risk optimization after initiation of ARPI therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of any CV medication Initiation and/or Change
Time Frame: 3 Months Post-Intervention
To evaluate the rate of any CV medication initiation and/or change at 3-months following cardio-oncology consultation versus standard of care. Rate of any CV medication intervention at 3-months (Note: CV medication defined as: lipid-lowering, anti-hypertensive, anti-anginal, anti-platelet, anti-arrhythmic, heart failure medications)
3 Months Post-Intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Rate of Compliance with CV Therapeutic Medication Intervention
Time Frame: 6 and 12 Months Post Intervention
To determine the rate of compliance with CV therapeutic medication intervention at 6 and 12 months
6 and 12 Months Post Intervention
Rate of Statin Intervetion
Time Frame: 3 Months Post Intervention
To determine the rate of statin intervention at 3 months
3 Months Post Intervention
Rate of Compliance with Statin Medication Intervention
Time Frame: 6 and 12 Months Post Intervention
To determine the rate of compliance with statin medication intervention at 6 and 12 months
6 and 12 Months Post Intervention
Rate of any CV Medication Intervention
Time Frame: 6 Months Post-Intervention
To determine the rate of any CV medication intervention at 6 months
6 Months Post-Intervention
Changes in Biological CV Risk Factor
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
To assess changes in biological CV risk factors (low density lipoprotein [LDL])
3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
Changes in Biological CV Risk Factor
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
To assess changes in biological CV risk factors (systolic blood pressure)
3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
Changes in Biological CV Risk Factor
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
To assess changes in biological CV risk factors (hemoglobin A1c)
3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
Changes in Biological CV Risk Factor
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
To assess changes in biological CV risk factors (body mass index)
3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
Rate of Coronary Artery Disease Testing
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
To determine the rate of coronary artery disease (CAD) testing (coronary CT angiograms, CAC scans, stress tests, and invasive coronary angiograms)
3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
Rate of new CV or Cardiac Diagnosis
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
To determine the rate of new CV or cardiac diagnosis
3, 6, and 12 Month Post-Intervention
One-Year MACE Rate
Time Frame: 12 Months Post-Intervention
To determine the one-year MACE rate
12 Months Post-Intervention
Rate of Grade ≥ 2 Cardiac CTCAE
Time Frame: 12 Month Post-Intervention
To determine one-year rate of grade ≥ 2 cardiac common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE)
12 Month Post-Intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Katelyn Atkins, MD, PhD, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Leslie Ballas, MD, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis)

Clinical Trials on Cardio-Oncology Referral

Subscribe