Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Care Process (ReCO)

March 13, 2024 updated by: Carlos Peña Gil, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago

Hospital-based Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Care Process for Cardiovascular Health in Cancer Patients

The objective of this observational study is to assess the outcomes of a hospital-based Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation (CORe) program focused on exercise in cancer patients undergoing cardiotoxic treatment. This evaluation will be conducted by analyzing disease-related health indicators, functional capacity, and quality of life. Patients at risk of cardiotoxicity attending the Cardio-Onco-Hematology Unit will be offered the exercise program, which includes two modalities: in-person (center-based) and remote (home-based) options. The assignment to either modality is non randomized, based on the functional assessment conducted in the Rehabilitation Unit and the agreement between healthcare professional and patient. All participants will perform a 3-month supervised exercise intervention. There are 3 time points for assessment: at baseline (T0), 3-month after the exercise program (T1) and follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Advancements in pharmacological cancer treatment have significantly improved prognosis and increased survival rates. However, the chronicity of treatment-related side effects or associated comorbidities may be exacerbated. Various chemotherapy treatments are associated with the potential development of cardiovascular diseases, such as cardiotoxicity, which stands as a main cause of death among women with early-stage breast cancer. Additionally, other side effects, such as fatigue, loss of muscle mass, insomnia, lymphedema, and cognitive impairments, can markedly decline the quality of life of these patients.

The comprehensive care of oncology patients should extend beyond curative interventions like surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. It must encompass other aspects, such as psychological support, social support and therapeutic exercise programs to enhance the overall treatment experience and improve the quality of life. Exercise has proven to reduce mortality, morbidity, and the risk of recurrence, improving treatment tolerance and reducing interruptions, thereby promoting adherence. Supervised exercise programs are increasingly recognized as a low-cost and a side-effect-free "polypill". However, they have not yet been integrated into the standard care of patients with cancer.

The inherited experience from multimodal Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) programs with a comprehensive assessment and a multifaceted intervention with exercise programs as a central component; could be extended to cancer patients, resulting in a CORe program (ReCO in Spanish) by utilizing available CR programs in all healthcare areas.

The proposed CORe care process is grounded in the prior experience with the ONCORE trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03964142), which has helped in the implementation of new, structured, and controlled healthcare service, ensuring higher quality, safety, and efficiency in healthcare.

The implementation of the CORe program will take place at the University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), under the coordination of the Cardiology, Oncology, and Rehabilitation services. The management of participants data and the establishment of indicators should facilitate the monitoring of the process and the evaluation of the results of clinical interventions.

The goal of this project is to assess the outcomes of a CORe care process through the analysis of health-related indicators, functional capacity, and the quality of life of breast cancer participants attending the Cardio-Oncology Unit.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • A Coruña
      • Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain, 15706

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with breast cancer at high risk of developing cardiotoxicity

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • High risk of cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity
  • Possibility of completing a cardio-onco rehabilitation program (centre-based or home-based) and programmed visits.
  • Providing written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with physical or mental limitation to carry out an exercise program.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Center-Based Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation (CBCORe)
Therapeutic exercise program supervised by a physiotherapist. 2 days/week, duration 1h, in the Cardiac Rehabilitation ward.
Within the multidisciplinary approach of cardio-oncology rehabilitation, the exercise program will include recommendation and supervision of strength, aerobic and mobility exercises.
Home-Based Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation (HBCORe)
Recommendation of physical exercise and motivational interview through telephone follow-up every 2 weeks by the physiotherapist.
Within the multidisciplinary approach of cardio-oncology rehabilitation, the exercise program will include recommendation and supervision of strength, aerobic and mobility exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in left ventricular systolic function quantified by left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain by transthoracic echocardiography
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Fall of 10 absolute percentage points of left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline or with final value below 53% or global longitudinal strain fall >15% with respect to baseline
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Increased cardiac biomarkers (Troponin I and BNP/NT-proBNP)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
cTnI/T>percentil 99, BNP≥35 pg/mL, NT-proBNP≥125 pg/mL
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Decrease in functional capacity assessed by estimated VO2peak
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
To estimate VO2peak, the ONCORE equation developed in the following article is used: Díaz-Balboa, E., González-Salvado, V., Rodríguez-Romero, B. et al. Thirty-second sit-to-stand test as an alternative for estimating peak oxygen uptake and 6-min walking distance in women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer 30, 8251-8260 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07268-z
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in cardiovascular risk profile as assessed by the presence or absence of classic cardiovascular risk factors.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Dyslipidemia, Diabetes mellitus, Arterial Hypertension, Smoking status
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Changes in fasting blood glucose
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Value of fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) in blood tests
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Changes in total low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol (TC) levels
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Value of LDL >160 mg/dL or CT> 200 mg/dL in blood tests
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Change in haemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Value of haemoglobin (g/dL) in blood tests
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
Significant cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular adverse effects during treatment.
Time Frame: Date of the event throughout the study.
number of participants with significant cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular adverse effects throughout the study, threatening life, requiring admission, prolonging hospitalization, being clinically relevant or causing chemotherapy interruptions.
Date of the event throughout the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in health-related quality of life assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast plus Arm Morbidity (FACT-B+4) questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Score achieved in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast plus Arm Morbidity (FACT-B+4) questionnaire, a specific validated scale to assess quality of life of women with breast cancer. It comprises 27 items within 5 areas of assessment: physical well-being (7 items), social and family environment (7 items), emotional well-being (7 items), functional well-being (6 items) and worries related to the diagnosis and treatment of the disease (9 items). Each item is scored by means of a Likert scale from 0 to 5, with higher scores representing better results. The total score is obtained by adding the scores for each item, and ranges from a minimum of 0 (worst possible result) to a maximum of 146 (best possible result).
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in localized lower limb functional capacity assessed by number of repetitions performed within 30 seconds in the sit-to-stand test.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Number of repetitions in the sit-to-stand test within 30 seconds.
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in lower limb strength measured by squat dynamometry (kg).
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Kilograms by dynamometry.
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in biceps strength by dynamometry (kg).
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Kilograms by dynamometry.
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in perimeter (cm) of the right thigh 5cm above the upper edge of the patella
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Thigh perimeter measured with a tape measure in cm.
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Changes in peak expiratory flow
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
The peak expiratory flow in units of liters per minute (L/min), measured with a peak flow meter.
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in upper limb strength measured by dynamometry (kg).
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Grip strength (both right and left side) and bilateral biceps strength in kilograms by dynamometry.
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in anthropometric parameters: weight in kg.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Weight measured in kg.
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in anthropometric parameters: Body mass index (BMI) in kg/m^2
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in anthropometric parameters: abdominal circumference in cm.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Abdominal perimeter measured with a tape measure in cm.
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in resting heart rate measured by pulse oximetry (beats per min).
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Resting heart rate by pulse oximetry (beats per min).
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in resting blood pressure (mmHg) measured by a blood pressure monitor.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Resting blood pressure by a blood pressure monitor in mmHg.
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
Change in physical activity assessed by the score in the Godin Leisure Test Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ).
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
Score achieved in the Godin Leisure Test Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) for quantification of physical activity. Activities are classified into three subgroups: "strenuous," "moderate," and "light." The scores corresponding to the energy expenditure (metabolic equivalent (MET)) are obtained by multiplying activities performed for more than 15 min in a week with their coefficients. The numbers represent the MET intensity values (strenuous/ exhausting exercises: 9 METs, moderate exercises: 5 METs, and light exercises: 3 METs).The increasing scores are associated with the increasing number of exercise behaviors, providing references about the contribution of physical activity to health: the activity score of 24 units and more as active (substantial benefits); the activity score of 14-23 units as moderately active (some benefits); and the activity score of 13 units and less as inactive (less substantial or low benefits).
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
Change in cardiovascular treatment by its presence or absence.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
ACE Inhibitor/ARB II; Beta-blocker; Statins; Ezetimibe
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence and compliance to cardiac rehabilitation program (CBCORe) assessed by number of training sessions attended/number of sessions planned.
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
Number of training sessions attended / number of sessions planned.
At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
Compliance to home-based cardiac rehabilitation program (HBCORe) assessed by the total number of telephone calls during the Physiotherapy follow-up and the total time of telephone calls.
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
Number of telephone calls attended / number of telephone calls planned.
At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
Security of the cardiac rehabilitation program assessed by number of adverse events during training (CBCORe).
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
Adverse events during training.
At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
Satisfaction with the CORe program
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
Global satisfaction is scored from 0 (no benefit) to 10 (highest benefit); and evaluated with an open-ended question, how do you expect to benefit from participating in the program?
At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
Follow-up of the exercise performed after participation in the CORe program
Time Frame: At follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
Question (yes/no): do you continue exercising? supervized? if supervized, is it individualized by a physiotherapist? individualized by a personal trainer? recommendations from a technician in a gym? or city council group activities?
At follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
Presence or absence of lymphoedema.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
It is considered 2 cm difference between upper limbs. Measurement is performed at the base of the 3rd finger, hand, wrist, 10 cm above the wrist, elbow, 10 cm above the elbow and axilla.
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Carlos Peña-Gil, MD, PhD, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago
  • Study Chair: Violeta González-Salvado, MD, PhD, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 22, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 22, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 22, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ReCO
  • 2022/137 (Other Identifier: Comité de Ética de la Investigación de Santiago-Lugo)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Shared in the institutional repository of SERGAS (RUNA), upon request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Exercise-based cardio-oncology rehabilitation

3
Subscribe