- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06302634
Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Care Process (ReCO)
Hospital-based Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Care Process for Cardiovascular Health in Cancer Patients
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Advancements in pharmacological cancer treatment have significantly improved prognosis and increased survival rates. However, the chronicity of treatment-related side effects or associated comorbidities may be exacerbated. Various chemotherapy treatments are associated with the potential development of cardiovascular diseases, such as cardiotoxicity, which stands as a main cause of death among women with early-stage breast cancer. Additionally, other side effects, such as fatigue, loss of muscle mass, insomnia, lymphedema, and cognitive impairments, can markedly decline the quality of life of these patients.
The comprehensive care of oncology patients should extend beyond curative interventions like surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. It must encompass other aspects, such as psychological support, social support and therapeutic exercise programs to enhance the overall treatment experience and improve the quality of life. Exercise has proven to reduce mortality, morbidity, and the risk of recurrence, improving treatment tolerance and reducing interruptions, thereby promoting adherence. Supervised exercise programs are increasingly recognized as a low-cost and a side-effect-free "polypill". However, they have not yet been integrated into the standard care of patients with cancer.
The inherited experience from multimodal Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) programs with a comprehensive assessment and a multifaceted intervention with exercise programs as a central component; could be extended to cancer patients, resulting in a CORe program (ReCO in Spanish) by utilizing available CR programs in all healthcare areas.
The proposed CORe care process is grounded in the prior experience with the ONCORE trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03964142), which has helped in the implementation of new, structured, and controlled healthcare service, ensuring higher quality, safety, and efficiency in healthcare.
The implementation of the CORe program will take place at the University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), under the coordination of the Cardiology, Oncology, and Rehabilitation services. The management of participants data and the establishment of indicators should facilitate the monitoring of the process and the evaluation of the results of clinical interventions.
The goal of this project is to assess the outcomes of a CORe care process through the analysis of health-related indicators, functional capacity, and the quality of life of breast cancer participants attending the Cardio-Oncology Unit.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Estíbaliz Díaz-Balboa, PT
- Phone Number: +34 981950747
- Email: estibaliz.diaz.balboa@sergas.es
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Bibiana Villamayor-Blanco, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: + 34 981950744
- Email: bibiana.villamayor.blanco@sergas.es
Study Locations
-
-
A Coruña
-
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain, 15706
- Recruiting
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago
-
Contact:
- Carlos Peña-Gil, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +34 981 950 778
- Email: carlos.pena.gil@sergas.es
-
Contact:
- Estíbaliz Díaz-Balboa
- Phone Number: +34 981950747
- Email: estibaliz.diaz.balboa@sergas.es
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- High risk of cancer treatment-related cardiotoxicity
- Possibility of completing a cardio-onco rehabilitation program (centre-based or home-based) and programmed visits.
- Providing written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with physical or mental limitation to carry out an exercise program.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Center-Based Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation (CBCORe)
Therapeutic exercise program supervised by a physiotherapist. 2 days/week, duration 1h, in the Cardiac Rehabilitation ward.
|
Within the multidisciplinary approach of cardio-oncology rehabilitation, the exercise program will include recommendation and supervision of strength, aerobic and mobility exercises.
|
Home-Based Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation (HBCORe)
Recommendation of physical exercise and motivational interview through telephone follow-up every 2 weeks by the physiotherapist.
|
Within the multidisciplinary approach of cardio-oncology rehabilitation, the exercise program will include recommendation and supervision of strength, aerobic and mobility exercises.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in left ventricular systolic function quantified by left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain by transthoracic echocardiography
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Fall of 10 absolute percentage points of left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline or with final value below 53% or global longitudinal strain fall >15% with respect to baseline
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Increased cardiac biomarkers (Troponin I and BNP/NT-proBNP)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
cTnI/T>percentil 99, BNP≥35 pg/mL, NT-proBNP≥125 pg/mL
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Decrease in functional capacity assessed by estimated VO2peak
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
To estimate VO2peak, the ONCORE equation developed in the following article is used: Díaz-Balboa, E., González-Salvado, V., Rodríguez-Romero, B. et al.
Thirty-second sit-to-stand test as an alternative for estimating peak oxygen uptake and 6-min walking distance in women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.
Support Care Cancer 30, 8251-8260 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07268-z
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in cardiovascular risk profile as assessed by the presence or absence of classic cardiovascular risk factors.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Dyslipidemia, Diabetes mellitus, Arterial Hypertension, Smoking status
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Changes in fasting blood glucose
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Value of fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) in blood tests
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Changes in total low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol (TC) levels
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Value of LDL >160 mg/dL or CT> 200 mg/dL in blood tests
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Change in haemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Value of haemoglobin (g/dL) in blood tests
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2); every year after study completion up to a maximum of 5 years
|
Significant cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular adverse effects during treatment.
Time Frame: Date of the event throughout the study.
|
number of participants with significant cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular adverse effects throughout the study, threatening life, requiring admission, prolonging hospitalization, being clinically relevant or causing chemotherapy interruptions.
|
Date of the event throughout the study.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in health-related quality of life assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast plus Arm Morbidity (FACT-B+4) questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Score achieved in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast plus Arm Morbidity (FACT-B+4) questionnaire, a specific validated scale to assess quality of life of women with breast cancer.
It comprises 27 items within 5 areas of assessment: physical well-being (7 items), social and family environment (7 items), emotional well-being (7 items), functional well-being (6 items) and worries related to the diagnosis and treatment of the disease (9 items).
Each item is scored by means of a Likert scale from 0 to 5, with higher scores representing better results.
The total score is obtained by adding the scores for each item, and ranges from a minimum of 0 (worst possible result) to a maximum of 146 (best possible result).
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in localized lower limb functional capacity assessed by number of repetitions performed within 30 seconds in the sit-to-stand test.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Number of repetitions in the sit-to-stand test within 30 seconds.
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in lower limb strength measured by squat dynamometry (kg).
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Kilograms by dynamometry.
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in biceps strength by dynamometry (kg).
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Kilograms by dynamometry.
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in perimeter (cm) of the right thigh 5cm above the upper edge of the patella
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Thigh perimeter measured with a tape measure in cm.
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Changes in peak expiratory flow
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
The peak expiratory flow in units of liters per minute (L/min), measured with a peak flow meter.
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in upper limb strength measured by dynamometry (kg).
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Grip strength (both right and left side) and bilateral biceps strength in kilograms by dynamometry.
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in anthropometric parameters: weight in kg.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Weight measured in kg.
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in anthropometric parameters: Body mass index (BMI) in kg/m^2
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in anthropometric parameters: abdominal circumference in cm.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Abdominal perimeter measured with a tape measure in cm.
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in resting heart rate measured by pulse oximetry (beats per min).
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Resting heart rate by pulse oximetry (beats per min).
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in resting blood pressure (mmHg) measured by a blood pressure monitor.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Resting blood pressure by a blood pressure monitor in mmHg.
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2)
|
Change in physical activity assessed by the score in the Godin Leisure Test Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ).
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
|
Score achieved in the Godin Leisure Test Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) for quantification of physical activity.
Activities are classified into three subgroups: "strenuous," "moderate," and "light."
The scores corresponding to the energy expenditure (metabolic equivalent (MET)) are obtained by multiplying activities performed for more than 15 min in a week with their coefficients.
The numbers represent the MET intensity values (strenuous/ exhausting exercises: 9 METs, moderate exercises: 5 METs, and light exercises: 3 METs).The increasing scores are associated with the increasing number of exercise behaviors, providing references about the contribution of physical activity to health: the activity score of 24 units and more as active (substantial benefits); the activity score of 14-23 units as moderately active (some benefits); and the activity score of 13 units and less as inactive (less substantial or low benefits).
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
|
Change in cardiovascular treatment by its presence or absence.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
|
ACE Inhibitor/ARB II; Beta-blocker; Statins; Ezetimibe
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Adherence and compliance to cardiac rehabilitation program (CBCORe) assessed by number of training sessions attended/number of sessions planned.
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
|
Number of training sessions attended / number of sessions planned.
|
At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
|
Compliance to home-based cardiac rehabilitation program (HBCORe) assessed by the total number of telephone calls during the Physiotherapy follow-up and the total time of telephone calls.
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
|
Number of telephone calls attended / number of telephone calls planned.
|
At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
|
Security of the cardiac rehabilitation program assessed by number of adverse events during training (CBCORe).
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
|
Adverse events during training.
|
At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
|
Satisfaction with the CORe program
Time Frame: At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
|
Global satisfaction is scored from 0 (no benefit) to 10 (highest benefit); and evaluated with an open-ended question, how do you expect to benefit from participating in the program?
|
At the end of the cardiac rehabilitation program (3 months duration).
|
Follow-up of the exercise performed after participation in the CORe program
Time Frame: At follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
|
Question (yes/no): do you continue exercising?
supervized? if supervized, is it individualized by a physiotherapist?
individualized by a personal trainer?
recommendations from a technician in a gym? or city council group activities?
|
At follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
|
Presence or absence of lymphoedema.
Time Frame: Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
|
It is considered 2 cm difference between upper limbs.
Measurement is performed at the base of the 3rd finger, hand, wrist, 10 cm above the wrist, elbow, 10 cm above the elbow and axilla.
|
Baseline (T0); 3 months after completing the exercise program (T1); follow-up at 9 months from baseline (T2).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Carlos Peña-Gil, MD, PhD, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago
- Study Chair: Violeta González-Salvado, MD, PhD, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ReCO
- 2022/137 (Other Identifier: Comité de Ética de la Investigación de Santiago-Lugo)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases
-
Medical College of WisconsinRecruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Cardiovascular Risk Factor | Cardiovascular HealthUnited States
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaCompleted
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular Risk FactorsUnited States
-
Women's College HospitalUniversity Health Network, Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Brigham... and other collaboratorsUnknownCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESCanada, United States
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephTerminatedCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESFrance
-
University of FloridaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham; Brown UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Disease | Psychosocial Influence on Cardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingCardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
-
Baptist Health South FloridaUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Quest Diagnostics-Nichols InsituteActive, not recruitingCardiovascular DiseaseUnited States
-
Laval UniversityActive, not recruitingCardiovascular DiseaseCanada
-
Penn State UniversityCalifornia Healthcare InstituteCompleted
Clinical Trials on Exercise-based cardio-oncology rehabilitation
-
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); National Institutes of Health...RecruitingHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantUnited States
-
University Health Network, TorontoUniversity of British Columbia; Alberta Health services; University of Alberta; Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) and other collaboratorsRecruitingHeart Failure | Cancer | CardiotoxicityCanada
-
University Health Network, TorontoActive, not recruiting
-
University of UtahRecruitingBreast CancerUnited States
-
Regional Hospital West JutlandUniversity of Aarhus; Central Denmark RegionCompleted
-
University of ChesterUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustCompletedCardiovascular DiseasesUnited Kingdom
-
Universidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaUniversidad de Zaragoza; Universidad Rey Juan CarlosCompletedStress | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSpain
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...National Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingRehabilitation | Atrophy of Muscle Due to DisuseUnited States
-
Tan Tock Seng HospitalNg Teng Fong Healthcare Innovation Programme; Nanyang Technological University-...UnknownPhysical Therapy | Arthroplasty, ReplacementSingapore
-
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita...RecruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Cardiovascular Risk FactorBrazil