A Double-blind Non Inferiority Clinical Trial to Compare the Nephroprotection of Cilastatn Versus Thiosulfate in Patients Undergoing Debulking Surgery With Intraoperative Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy With Cisplatin.

To compare cilastatin vs thiosulfatein renal protection in patients undergoing debulking surgery with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A double-blind non inferiority clinical trial to compare the nephroprotection of cilastatn versus thiosulfate in patients undergoing debulking surgery with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatin.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • Recruiting
        • Hodpsital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
        • Contact:
          • Alberto Lazaro, PHD
          • Phone Number: +34914265115
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: adult patients aged 18-75 years.

Sex: female. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≤ 2. General condition: patients eligible for major surgery, with creatinine, bilirubin, and blood count values within or close to the normal range (Hb >10 g/dL, leukocytes >3,000/mL, neutrophils >1,000/mL, platelets >100,000/mL).

Patients evaluated by the Anesthesiology Department and deemed fit for surgery. Signed informed consent. Disease confined to the abdomen: CRS + HIPEC is not indicated in patients with pulmonary, bone, or other distant metastases. Patients with limited hematogenous metastases to the spleen or liver may be considered. Patients with regional or distant intra-abdominal lymphatic dissemination may also be considered, provided complete resection is feasible. FIGO stage IVA epithelial ovarian carcinoma at presentation, due to pleural effusion with mediastinal lymph node or splenic metastases, is an indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy; if response is achieved, CRS + HIPEC may subsequently be considered.

Multidisciplinary Committee evaluation: radiological PCI is assessed, and the likelihood of achieving complete cytoreduction is estimated to determine the indication for CRS + HIPEC.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of consent to participate in the clinical trial. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) > 2. Not eligible for major surgery. Disease not confined to the abdomen, or with findings indicating that optimal cytoreduction is not achievable (e.g., intestinal obstruction, biliary obstruction, ureteral obstruction, or diffuse involvement of the small bowel or mesentery).

Known hypersensitivity to platinum-based agents.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: cilastatin
cilastatina 1,5 g
cilastatine 1.5 g
Active Comparator: tiosulfate
tiosulfate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with renal failure at 7 days
Time Frame: 7 days

Percentage of patients with renal failure at 7 days (If renal impairment is present, follow-up continues until postoperative day 14), assessed based on serum creatinine levels and KDIGO classification criteria.

Renal failure is defined as an increase in serum creatinine to 1.5-1.9 times the baseline value, or an increase in serum creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥26.5 µmol/L), or a reduction in urine output to <0.5 mL/kg/hour for 6 to 12 hours.

7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 21, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 21, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Kidney Injury

Subscribe