Outcomes of Using FANS With FURS in TTT of Lower Calyceal Stones.

November 18, 2025 updated by: Mahmoud Ahmed Elsayed Ahmed Lasheen, Zagazig University

Outcomes of Using Flexible and Navigable Suction Sheath With Flexible Ureteroscopy in Treatment of Lower Calyceal Stones: A Prospective Study

The aim of this study is to evaluate and assess the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with flexible and navigable suction UAS (FANS) in the treatment of lower calyceal stones.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

With the continued advancements of technology and increasing experience gained by urologists in ureteroscopic skills, fURS has become a standard treatment for kidney stones lesser than 2 cm in diameter. In the previous the European guidelines and American Urologic Association guidelines for management of urolithiasis, fURS were recommended as a second-line treatment for stones less than 2 cm after ESWL, however in the recent revision of the guidelines, RIRS can be used as the first-line management option especially for stones measuring between 11 and 20 mm.

The ureteral access sheath (UAS), initially introduced by Hisao Takayasu in 1974 Despite continued advances in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), recent real-world data for 6669 patients in the FLEXOR registry revealed residual fragments in 21.7% of patients, of whom 51.5% required a second intervention.

The sepsis rate in the same study was just 1.3%. Hence, there is still much to improve in terms of technical expertise and technology for RIRS. Many aids have been introduced to streamline RIRS and improve procedural success. These include suction via a scope or ureteral access sheath (UAS), postintervention catheters, slimmer single-use scopes, and high-power lasers, these improvements have made RIRS a standard of care according to international guidelines.

It has been reported that vacuum aided or suction aspiration sheaths have strong potential to improve the stone-free status (SFS) rate and minimize infectious compilations associated with the negative effects of high intrarenal pressure and temperature, However, the true potential of the advances for RIRS has yet to be investigated. The ideal game-changing technological innovation for RIRS should improve all key outcomes of the procedure, including the rate of immediate single stage SFS, perioperative and postoperative complications, and the reintervention rate for residual fragments. One recent advance that has shown much promise is a flexible and navigable sheath (FANS) So, we will conduct a prospective study to assess whether FANS could be a potential game-changer for RIRS in adults with lower calyceal stones instead of traditional UAS especially regarding stone-free rates (SFR), complications and cost.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Zagazig, Egypt, 44511
        • Recruiting
        • Zagazig University Hospitals
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients ≥ 18 years old.
  2. Patients with lower calyceal stones scheduled for FURS.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. patients with active urinary tract infections.
  2. Patients with renal and ureteric anomalies.
  3. patients with coagulopathy
  4. patients who are refusing to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: main arm .. single arm
Patients with lower calyceal stones

placement of flexible and navigable suction sheath (FANS)which has an oblique side branch with pressure vent, that can be connected to negative pressure aspiration, and a flexible tip, allowing for efficient and effective treatment of urinary stones.

  • Flexible URS diameter will be at the least 2 Fr smaller than the sheath.
  • The main tube is closed by a rubber seal with a center aperture as the flexible ureteroscope pathway, The oblique tube with a pressure-regulating venting slit along the longitudinal axis acts as a suctioning channel connected to a vacuum device.
  • The inflow of irrigation is through the endoscope, the outflow of irrigation is between the scope and the sheath.
  • A vortex is created at the distal end of the sheath, the irrigation fluid, the stone fragments, dust, and blood, etc. in the vortex can be aspirated out.
  • The aspiration pressure can be adjusted by the pressure vent on the oblique side branch of the sheath.
Other Names:
  • FANS ureteral access sheath

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Stone-Free Rate Following Flexible Ureteroscopy with FANS sheath for Management of Renal and Ureteral Calculi.
Time Frame: 1 month after the procedure (preferred and most common for SFR assessment)
This clinical study aims to evaluate the stone-free rate (SFR) following flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) in patients with renal or ureteral calculi. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients who achieve complete stone clearance, as determined by postoperative imaging (non-contrast CT or ultrasound) within a defined follow-up period.
1 month after the procedure (preferred and most common for SFR assessment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Abdul Latif Mohammed Zayed, professor of urology, Zagazig University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data will be available upon reasonable request from qualified researchers after study completion. A data dictionary will also be provided.

Time Frame: 6 months after final publication, available for 3 years. Access Criteria: Contact the principal investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Calculi

Clinical Trials on flexible and navigable suction sheath with flexible ureteroscopy

Subscribe