Role of the Noradrenergic System in the Regulation of Learning Dynamics: Evaluation of the Effect of a Low-dose Selective Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitor (NOISYXETINE) (NOISYXETINE)

November 18, 2025 updated by: Centre Hospitalier St Anne

Administration of low-dose selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (sNRI) (e.g. atomoxetine) to healthy subjects is a validated model of increasing cortical noradrenaline levels which, combined with computational modelling of behaviour, allows fine-grained analysis of the impact on learning processes of noradrenaline's fluctuations in the human cortex.

The study goal is to characterize the modifications of certain cognitive processes and associated brain circuits under low-dose sNRI using validated computational learning models. The study will be interested in how subjects will modify their learning under the effect of the drug across two separate investigations; one utilizing in a stable evidence accumulation task and one utilising a changing evidence accumulation task. This approach will help to better understand the link between noradrenaline and accumulation of evidence in healthy subjects, and indirectly in some neuropsychiatric pathologies.

The study is a single centre, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study involving evaluable healthy adults separated in 2 cohorts: A for participants having the stable task and B for those having the changing one. Participants will then be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment sequences:

  • Atomoxetine 40 mg - Placebo (Subgroups A1 or B1);
  • Placebo - Atomoxetine 40 mg (Subgroups A2 or B2).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hundred and sixty healthy volunteers will be enrolled (80 / task) in 24 months. The maximum duration of participation for each subject is 51 days.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Recruiting
        • Institut de Neuromodulation
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Philippe Domenech, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Right-handed, assessed by the Edinburgh scale;
  • Written signed informed consent;
  • Subject covered by a social security regimen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding woman;
  • First-degree family history of axis I disorder (DSM-IV-TR), excepted unipolar mood and anxiety disorders with OCD;
  • Personal history of axis I disorder (DSM-IV-TR) in the 6 months preceding the study entry;
  • Dependence on a psychoactive substance in the 12 months preceding the study entry, excluding nicotine, any behavioural disorder incompatible with a 2-hour electroencephalographic recording;
  • Neuro/psychotropic treatment ongoing or stopped less than 1 month ago;
  • Personal history of neurological pathology (e.g.: congenital malformation, benign or malignant tumour, degenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS), epilepsy, inflammatory or infectious disease of the CNS, etc.);
  • Personal history of chronic disease of infectious, neoplastic, vascular, dysimmune or inflammatory, metabolic or endocrine, degenerative or genetic aetiology. In particular, angle-closure glaucoma, pheochromocytoma, known high blood pressure or measured blood pressure greater than 140/90 mm Hg at baseline, congenital heart disease, known ischemic heart disease, known heart failure, supraventricular or ventricular heart rhythm disorder, nephropathy, known liver disease and any pathology likely to be aggravated by an increase in blood pressure;
  • Any medical treatment in the month preceding the study entry, apart from effective contraceptive treatment;
  • Subject deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision;
  • Person subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express consent;
  • Known intolerance to atomoxetine;
  • Need to wear glasses and/or lenses to obtain normal vision;
  • Subject in an exclusion period or enrolled in an interventional study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Sequence 1: Atomoxetine 40 mg - Placebo
The participants will receive one cap of atomoxetine 40 mg at V1 and placebo at V2

One single capsule of atomoxetine 40 mg given at one visit according to the sequence randomly allocated.

Placebo of atomoxetine will be administered at the other visit for the participant (according to the sequence randomly allocated)

One single capsule of placebo given at one visit according to the sequence randomly allocated.
Other: Sequence 2: Placebo - Atomoxetine 40 mg
The participants will receive one cap of placebo at V1 and atomoxetine 40 mg at V2

One single capsule of atomoxetine 40 mg given at one visit according to the sequence randomly allocated.

Placebo of atomoxetine will be administered at the other visit for the participant (according to the sequence randomly allocated)

One single capsule of placebo given at one visit according to the sequence randomly allocated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Apparent Learning rate
Time Frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

Paired difference in the apparent learning rates (in both environmental contexts: stable task and changing task), between the sNRI (atomoxetine) and control (placebo) conditions.

Apparent learning rate will be calculate with the following formula: αt=(vt- vt-(1) )/(xt- vt-1) according to Foucault and Meyniel (Foucault C, Meyniel F (2024) Two Determinants of Dynamic Adaptive Learning for Magnitudes and Probabilities. Open Mind : Discov Cogn Sci 8:615-638) The learning rate measures the amount of update of the learned value (from vt-(1 to vt) induced by the observation xt in proportion to its deviation from the previously learned value.

From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of adverse events
Time Frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)
Side effects (treatment related adverse events) in all groups between study drug administration at Visit 1 (Day 0) and Visit 2 (Day 7) including vital signs worsening and ECG findings
From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the computational modelling of behaviour at Visit 2 (Day 7)
Time Frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)
Computational modelling of behaviour at Visit 1 and 2: paired difference in latent behavioral parameters of the computational models that characterize the learning process (in a stable accumulation task and in a dynamic accumulation task), between the sNRI (atomoxetine) and control (placebo) conditions.
From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire at Visit 2
Time Frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

The scores of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire (Spielberger et al., 1983) will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of depression and anxiety.

The STAI comprises 2 questionnaires of 20 items with the following ranges:

  • STAI-YA (state anxiety): 0-80 with 0 equivalent to no anxiety and 80 the worst possible anxiety
  • STAI-YB (Trait anxiety): 0-80 with 0 equivalent to no anxiety and 80 the worst possible anxiety
From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaire at Visit 2
Time Frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

The scores of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) questionnaire (Beck et al., 1961) will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of depression.

The BDI comprises 21 items with the following ranges: 0-63 with 0 equivalent to no depression and 63 the worst possible depression.

From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) on anxiety at Visit 2
Time Frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

The scores of the VAS-anxiety will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of anxiety.

The VAS ranges from 0 (no anxiety) to 100 mm (worst possible anxiety).

From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) on sadness at Visit 2
Time Frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

The scores of the VAS-sadness will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of sadness.

The VAS ranges from 0 (no sadness) to 100 mm (worst possible sadness).

From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)
Change from Visit 1 (Day 0) in the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) on fatigue at Visit 2
Time Frame: From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

The scores of the VAS-fatigue will be compared between Hour 0 and Hour 3 at Visit 1 and Visit 2 to control for the effect of the substance on the subjects' levels of fatigue.

The VAS ranges from 0 (no fatigue) to 100 mm (maximum imaginable fatigue).

From Visit 1 (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 7)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • D24-P017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on No Disease or Condition is Being Studied

Clinical Trials on Atomoxetine

Subscribe