Minimally Invasive Prostate Interventions Registry (MIST Study) (MIST)

March 28, 2026 updated by: Selim Soyturk, Necmettin Erbakan University

Evaluation of Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Prostate Interventions: A Multicenter Prospective REDCap Registry (MIST Study)

This study is a multicenter prospective patient registry designed to evaluate clinical, functional, and safety outcomes after minimally invasive prostate interventions (MIST) performed for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The interventions included in this registry represent standard-of-care treatment options and may include Rezum water vapor therapy, UroLift prostatic urethral lift, Aquablation, prostatic artery embolization (PAE), iTind, transperineal laser ablation (TPLA), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), and transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT).

The registry collects standardized data using a secure REDCap platform from participating international centers. Data elements include demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medication use, laboratory parameters, prostate volume assessments, uroflowmetry, post-void residual measurements, patient-reported symptom scores, sexual function assessments, intraoperative details, complications (classified using Clavien-Dindo), and postoperative recovery parameters. Follow-up visits occur at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, with an optional extended follow-up at 72 months to assess long-term durability and reintervention-free survival.

The primary aim of the study is to evaluate improvements in urinary symptoms (IPSS), quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual volume (PVR) following MIST procedures. Secondary objectives include assessing perioperative safety, catheterization duration, predictors of treatment success or failure, need for reintervention, and long-term preservation of continence and sexual function.

This registry is observational and does not assign or modify any treatment. All procedures are performed based on local clinical practice and physician judgment. Prospective participants provide informed consent. Data collected will be used to generate real-world evidence to guide patient selection, optimize procedural outcomes, and compare clinical performance across different minimally invasive prostate interventions.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men. Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) have become increasingly utilized due to their favorable safety profiles, reduced hospitalization times, preservation of sexual function, and quicker return to normal activities. Despite their growing use, comparative real-world data across MIST modalities remain limited, especially regarding long-term functional outcomes and retreatment rates.

The MIST Registry is an investigator-initiated, non-commercial, multicenter, observational cohort study coordinated by the Department of Urology at Necmettin Erbakan University. The aim is to systematically collect high-quality clinical data from centers using a standardized REDCap electronic data capture system. The registry includes patients treated with any guideline-supported minimally invasive prostate intervention, including Rezum, UroLift, Aquablation, prostatic artery embolization (PAE), iTind, TPLA, TUNA, and TUMT. These procedures are performed as part of routine clinical care and not assigned by the study.

Data collection includes demographics, comorbidities, prior BPO treatments, LUTS medication history, PSA levels, prostate volume, presence and size of median lobe, uroflowmetry parameters, PVR, patient-reported outcomes (IPSS, QoL, IIEF-5, MSHQ-EjD), and urodynamic findings when available. Intraoperative data include type of MIST technique, procedure duration, device usage, energy delivery parameters, imaging guidance, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative complications. Postoperative outcomes include catheterization duration, early complications within 30 days, rehospitalization, urinary retention, infections, and device-related events. Complications are categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and bladder injury can be scored using the BICEP system where relevant.

Follow-up assessments occur at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, with optional long-term evaluations at 72 months. Outcomes assessed include symptom scores, Qmax, PVR, PSA, medication changes, and any surgical or minimally invasive reinterventions. Statistical analyses will include descriptive summaries, longitudinal comparisons, multivariable modeling to identify predictors of success or failure, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of reintervention-free survival.

The registry is designed to generate real-world evidence that reflects routine clinical practice across diverse populations and healthcare systems. Findings are expected to inform patient selection, refine procedural decision-making, improve counseling on expected outcomes, and support comparative effectiveness research among emerging minimally invasive prostate treatments.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men aged 40 years and older undergoing minimally invasive prostate interventions for benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH/LUTS) or benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) across multiple international centers. All treatments are standard-of-care MIST procedures, and participants are followed longitudinally in a single observational registry cohort.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients aged ≥40 years
  • Diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or benign prostatic obstruction (BPO)
  • Undergoing a minimally invasive prostate intervention (Rezum, UroLift, Aquablation, PAE, iTind, TPLA, TUNA, TUMT) as part of standard clinical care
  • Ability and willingness to attend scheduled follow-up visits
  • Prospective participants able to provide written informed consent
  • Retrospective cases eligible if data are fully de-identified and inclusion is approved by local ethics/IRB authorities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active urinary tract infection at the time of treatment
  • ASA physical status ≥5
  • Prior pelvic radiotherapy resulting in severe bladder dysfunction
  • Severe cognitive impairment or inability to participate in follow-up
  • Missing essential baseline data (for retrospective entries)
  • Patients receiving experimental or investigational prostate devices or therapies outside routine clinical care

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
MIST_Cohort
Men aged ≥40 years undergoing minimally invasive prostate interventions (Rezum, Urolift, Aquablation, PAE, iTind, TPLA, TUNA, TUMT) as part of routine clinical care. All participants are observed prospectively in a single registry cohort without assignment to treatment.
Participants receive standard-of-care minimally invasive prostate interventions determined by their treating clinicians. The study does not assign or alter any treatment; it only observes outcomes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
IPSS is a validated 0-35 questionnaire assessing lower urinary tract symptoms. Lower scores indicate symptom improvement. Change from baseline will be evaluated at each follow-up visit using patient-reported scores collected via standardized REDCap forms.
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
Change in maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
Qmax (mL/s) is measured by uroflowmetry at each clinical visit. Improvement in urinary flow represents treatment effectiveness. Change from baseline will be analyzed longitudinally.
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
Change in quality of life (QoL) score (IPSS subscore)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
QoL score ranges from 0-6. Lower scores reflect improved quality of life. Change from baseline is measured using the IPSS-QoL item collected through REDCap.
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Post-Void Residual (PVR) volume
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months
PVR (mL) measured by ultrasound or bladder scanner. Lower values indicate improved bladder emptying.
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months
Change in sexual function (IIEF-5 score)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 72 months
IIEF-5 is a validated 5-item erectile function scale (5-25). Higher scores indicate better sexual function.
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 72 months
Change in ejaculatory function (MSHQ-EjD score)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 72 months
MSHQ-EjD evaluates ejaculatory function and bother. Higher function scores indicate improvement.
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 72 months
Catheterization duration
Time Frame: Within first 30 postoperative days
Duration of urinary catheter use (days) recorded after MIST procedures.
Within first 30 postoperative days
Early postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification)
Time Frame: Within 30 postoperative days
Complications will be categorized using Clavien-Dindo Grade I-V based on standardized definitions.
Within 30 postoperative days
BICEP bladder injury score
Time Frame: During the procedure
Bladder injury is graded using the validated BICEP classification (0-4b). Applicable only when morcellation or bladder instrumentation is performed.
During the procedure
Reintervention rate
Time Frame: Up to 72 months
Need for additional surgery or MIST (TURP, AEEP/HoLEP, repeat MIST, PAE, Aquablation, urethrotomy, implant revisions, etc.).
Up to 72 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Selçuk Güven, MD, PhD, Necmettin Erbakan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 25, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be available upon reasonable request for research purposes. Data will be shared following local ethics committee approval and execution of a data-use agreement. No direct patient identifiers will be shared. Data will include demographic variables, baseline assessments, operative details, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up measures collected in the registry.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents will be available beginning 12 months after publication of the primary results manuscript and will remain available for a minimum of 5 years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Only qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal will be granted access. Requests must be reviewed and approved by the principal investigator and require completion of a data-use agreement. Access will be provided in de-identified format only and delivered via secure, password-protected electronic transfer. No direct identifiers or protected health information will be shared.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Clinical Trials on No intervention

Subscribe