- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07242807
Minimally Invasive Prostate Interventions Registry (MIST Study) (MIST)
Evaluation of Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Prostate Interventions: A Multicenter Prospective REDCap Registry (MIST Study)
This study is a multicenter prospective patient registry designed to evaluate clinical, functional, and safety outcomes after minimally invasive prostate interventions (MIST) performed for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The interventions included in this registry represent standard-of-care treatment options and may include Rezum water vapor therapy, UroLift prostatic urethral lift, Aquablation, prostatic artery embolization (PAE), iTind, transperineal laser ablation (TPLA), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), and transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT).
The registry collects standardized data using a secure REDCap platform from participating international centers. Data elements include demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medication use, laboratory parameters, prostate volume assessments, uroflowmetry, post-void residual measurements, patient-reported symptom scores, sexual function assessments, intraoperative details, complications (classified using Clavien-Dindo), and postoperative recovery parameters. Follow-up visits occur at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, with an optional extended follow-up at 72 months to assess long-term durability and reintervention-free survival.
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate improvements in urinary symptoms (IPSS), quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual volume (PVR) following MIST procedures. Secondary objectives include assessing perioperative safety, catheterization duration, predictors of treatment success or failure, need for reintervention, and long-term preservation of continence and sexual function.
This registry is observational and does not assign or modify any treatment. All procedures are performed based on local clinical practice and physician judgment. Prospective participants provide informed consent. Data collected will be used to generate real-world evidence to guide patient selection, optimize procedural outcomes, and compare clinical performance across different minimally invasive prostate interventions.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men. Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) have become increasingly utilized due to their favorable safety profiles, reduced hospitalization times, preservation of sexual function, and quicker return to normal activities. Despite their growing use, comparative real-world data across MIST modalities remain limited, especially regarding long-term functional outcomes and retreatment rates.
The MIST Registry is an investigator-initiated, non-commercial, multicenter, observational cohort study coordinated by the Department of Urology at Necmettin Erbakan University. The aim is to systematically collect high-quality clinical data from centers using a standardized REDCap electronic data capture system. The registry includes patients treated with any guideline-supported minimally invasive prostate intervention, including Rezum, UroLift, Aquablation, prostatic artery embolization (PAE), iTind, TPLA, TUNA, and TUMT. These procedures are performed as part of routine clinical care and not assigned by the study.
Data collection includes demographics, comorbidities, prior BPO treatments, LUTS medication history, PSA levels, prostate volume, presence and size of median lobe, uroflowmetry parameters, PVR, patient-reported outcomes (IPSS, QoL, IIEF-5, MSHQ-EjD), and urodynamic findings when available. Intraoperative data include type of MIST technique, procedure duration, device usage, energy delivery parameters, imaging guidance, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative complications. Postoperative outcomes include catheterization duration, early complications within 30 days, rehospitalization, urinary retention, infections, and device-related events. Complications are categorized according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and bladder injury can be scored using the BICEP system where relevant.
Follow-up assessments occur at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, with optional long-term evaluations at 72 months. Outcomes assessed include symptom scores, Qmax, PVR, PSA, medication changes, and any surgical or minimally invasive reinterventions. Statistical analyses will include descriptive summaries, longitudinal comparisons, multivariable modeling to identify predictors of success or failure, and Kaplan-Meier estimates of reintervention-free survival.
The registry is designed to generate real-world evidence that reflects routine clinical practice across diverse populations and healthcare systems. Findings are expected to inform patient selection, refine procedural decision-making, improve counseling on expected outcomes, and support comparative effectiveness research among emerging minimally invasive prostate treatments.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Selim Soytürk, MD
- Phone Number: +905077299193
- Email: selim.soyturk@erbakan.edu.tr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye), 42250
- Necmettin Erbakan University Medical Faculty Hospital
-
Contact:
- Selim Soytürk, MD
- Phone Number: +905077299193
- Email: selimsoyturk06@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male patients aged ≥40 years
- Diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or benign prostatic obstruction (BPO)
- Undergoing a minimally invasive prostate intervention (Rezum, UroLift, Aquablation, PAE, iTind, TPLA, TUNA, TUMT) as part of standard clinical care
- Ability and willingness to attend scheduled follow-up visits
- Prospective participants able to provide written informed consent
- Retrospective cases eligible if data are fully de-identified and inclusion is approved by local ethics/IRB authorities
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active urinary tract infection at the time of treatment
- ASA physical status ≥5
- Prior pelvic radiotherapy resulting in severe bladder dysfunction
- Severe cognitive impairment or inability to participate in follow-up
- Missing essential baseline data (for retrospective entries)
- Patients receiving experimental or investigational prostate devices or therapies outside routine clinical care
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
MIST_Cohort
Men aged ≥40 years undergoing minimally invasive prostate interventions (Rezum, Urolift, Aquablation, PAE, iTind, TPLA, TUNA, TUMT) as part of routine clinical care.
All participants are observed prospectively in a single registry cohort without assignment to treatment.
|
Participants receive standard-of-care minimally invasive prostate interventions determined by their treating clinicians.
The study does not assign or alter any treatment; it only observes outcomes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
|
IPSS is a validated 0-35 questionnaire assessing lower urinary tract symptoms.
Lower scores indicate symptom improvement.
Change from baseline will be evaluated at each follow-up visit using patient-reported scores collected via standardized REDCap forms.
|
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
|
|
Change in maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
|
Qmax (mL/s) is measured by uroflowmetry at each clinical visit.
Improvement in urinary flow represents treatment effectiveness.
Change from baseline will be analyzed longitudinally.
|
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
|
|
Change in quality of life (QoL) score (IPSS subscore)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
|
QoL score ranges from 0-6.
Lower scores reflect improved quality of life.
Change from baseline is measured using the IPSS-QoL item collected through REDCap.
|
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months post-procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Post-Void Residual (PVR) volume
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months
|
PVR (mL) measured by ultrasound or bladder scanner.
Lower values indicate improved bladder emptying.
|
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and optional 72 months
|
|
Change in sexual function (IIEF-5 score)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 72 months
|
IIEF-5 is a validated 5-item erectile function scale (5-25).
Higher scores indicate better sexual function.
|
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 72 months
|
|
Change in ejaculatory function (MSHQ-EjD score)
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 72 months
|
MSHQ-EjD evaluates ejaculatory function and bother.
Higher function scores indicate improvement.
|
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 72 months
|
|
Catheterization duration
Time Frame: Within first 30 postoperative days
|
Duration of urinary catheter use (days) recorded after MIST procedures.
|
Within first 30 postoperative days
|
|
Early postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification)
Time Frame: Within 30 postoperative days
|
Complications will be categorized using Clavien-Dindo Grade I-V based on standardized definitions.
|
Within 30 postoperative days
|
|
BICEP bladder injury score
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Bladder injury is graded using the validated BICEP classification (0-4b).
Applicable only when morcellation or bladder instrumentation is performed.
|
During the procedure
|
|
Reintervention rate
Time Frame: Up to 72 months
|
Need for additional surgery or MIST (TURP, AEEP/HoLEP, repeat MIST, PAE, Aquablation, urethrotomy, implant revisions, etc.).
|
Up to 72 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Selçuk Güven, MD, PhD, Necmettin Erbakan University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cornu JN, Zantek P, Burtt G, Martin C, Martin A, Springate C, Chughtai B. Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2023 Jun;83(6):534-547. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.028. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
- Rukstalis D, Grier D, Stroup SP, Tutrone R, deSouza E, Freedman S, David R, Kamientsky J, Eure G. Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL) for obstructive median lobes: 12 month results of the MedLift Study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Sep;22(3):411-419. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0118-x. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
- Huang SW, Tsai CY, Tseng CS, Shih MC, Yeh YC, Chien KL, Pu YS, Tu YK. Comparative efficacy and safety of new surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019 Nov 14;367:l5919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5919.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ReScore25-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
-
inTumo Therapeutics, Inc.RecruitingBPH | BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia) | BPH With Other Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
ALPFA MedicalNot yet recruiting
-
Qing YuanRecruiting
-
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of MunichRecruiting
-
Ankara UniversityNot yet recruitingBPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartCompletedBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) | Benign Prostatic Enlargement (BPE)Italy
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityNot yet recruitingBPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingBPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
-
University of ChicagoNot yet recruiting
-
General Hospital Sveti DuhNot yet recruitingBenign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Clinical Trials on No intervention
-
Hopital FochNot yet recruitingInterstitial Lung DiseaseFrance
-
Wave NeuroscienceCompletedAutistic DisorderUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedInflammatory Bowel Diseases | Colorectal Cancer | Diverticular Diseases | Social BehaviorUnited States
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedLupus Erythematosus, Systemic | Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous | Lupus Erythematosus, DiscoidUnited States, Poland
-
Hospital Universitario La Paz3MVX CCB and Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.; Department...RecruitingEmbolism | Atrial Fibrillation | Arrhythmia | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | AblationSpain
-
Southern California College of Optometry at Marshall...Ohio State University; University of Houston; Alcon Research; University of Waterloo and other collaboratorsCompletedContact Lens Complication | Contact Lens Acute Red Eye | Contact Lens Related Corneal Infiltrate (Disorder) | Contact Lens-Induced Corneal Fluorescein StainingUnited States, Canada
-
Huashan HospitalZhejiang Cancer Hospital; Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital; Tongji Hospital; Qilu Hospital... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHead and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Patient Derived Organoid | Drug Sensitive Test in VitroChina
-
China Medical University HospitalUnknownIntention to Stay, Turnover Behavior
-
University of Dublin, Trinity CollegeCompleted