Outpatient Posterior Cervical Fusion: Outcomes of the First 100 Consecutive Cases

November 19, 2025 updated by: NeuroSpine Center of Wisconsin

Outpatient Posterior Cervical Decompression, Instrumentation, and Fusion: The First Consecutive 100 Cases

Observational study regarding outcomes, complications, and patient acceptance for 100 consecutive patients undergoing outpatient posterior cervical decompression, instrumentation and fusion.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Neenah, Wisconsin, United States, 54956
        • NeuroSpine Center of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult males and females referred to the NeuroSpine Center of Wisconsin in Appleton, WI, with cervical stenosis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with neurological signs and symptoms related to cervical stenosis, confirmed by MRI, who have failed to improve with appropriate conservative management.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who represent an inordinate risk to undergo general anesthesia in the outpatient setting.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Posterior Cervical Decompression, Instrumentation and Fusion Patients
100 consecutive patients with documented cervical spinal cord and/or nerve root compression unresponsive to conservative management.
This is the only study evaluating OUTPATIENT posterior cervical decompression, instrumentation, and fusion patients in a prospective fashion with a median follow-up of 2.5 years.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurologic Function (Modified JOA Score)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-operative
Neurologic status will be assessed using the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Score (1-18), with higher scores indicating better neurologic function.
Baseline and 3 months post-operative
Myelopathy Severity (Nurick Grade)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-operative
Myelopathy severity will be measured using the Nurick Scale (Grades 0-5), with higher grades indicating greater impairment.
Baseline and 3 months post-operative
Pain Severity (VAS Neck and Arm Pain Scores)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months post-operative, and final follow-up (average 5 years)
Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain (0-10).
Baseline, 3 months post-operative, and final follow-up (average 5 years)
Functional Disability (Oswestry Neck Pain Index)
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months post-operative
Functional impairment will be assessed using the Oswestry Neck Pain Index (0-100%).
Baseline and 3 months post-operative
Surgical Outcome Rating (Odom Criteria)
Time Frame: 3 months post-operative and extended follow-up (average 5 years)
Patient-reported surgical outcome will be graded using Odom Criteria (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor).
3 months post-operative and extended follow-up (average 5 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications or Readmissions
Time Frame: Day of surgery through study completion (average 5 years)
All postoperative medical and surgical complications-including ER visits, unplanned admissions, and reoperations-will be recorded.
Day of surgery through study completion (average 5 years)
Number of Participants With Radiographic Evidence of Fusion or Hardware Failure
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, and extended follow-up (average 5 years)
Radiographic evaluation of fusion status, hardware failure, and pseudoarthrosis will be performed using AP/lateral and flexion-extension cervical spine radiographs.
6 weeks, 3 months, and extended follow-up (average 5 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TMW-2025-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol

Subscribe