The Efface of Lidocaine vs. Magnesium Sulphate in the Management of Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

November 18, 2025 updated by: Mustafa Hussain Imam, Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College

The Efface of Lidocaine vs. Magnesium Sulphate in the Management of Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This prospective interventional study was carried out at Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College to evaluate and compare the postoperative analgesic effects of intravenous lidocaine and magnesium sulphate in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A total of 168 ASA I-II patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups of 84 participants each (Group L: Lidocaine, Group M: Magnesium Sulphate) using a sealed-envelope randomization technique in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. All patients received standardized general anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, and atracurium, and routine postoperative care included intravenous diclofenac sodium and ondansetron. Postoperative pain was measured at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess and compare the efficacy and duration of analgesia between the two groups. The study aimed to provide insight into the relative analgesic performance of lidocaine and magnesium sulphate, supporting improved pain management strategies following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Optimal management of postoperative pain is crucial for enhancing recovery, minimizing stress responses, and promoting better outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This prospective interventional study was carried out in the Department of Anesthesiology at Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College to compare the analgesic effects of intravenous lidocaine and magnesium sulphate in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A total of 168 patients classified as ASA I-II with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones were enrolled after obtaining ethical approval and written informed consent. Participants were randomly assigned into two equal groups of 84 patients each (Group L: Lidocaine, Group M: Magnesium Sulphate) using a sealed-envelope technique. The study employed a double-blind, placebo-controlled design to ensure unbiased evaluation. Patients with ASA III-V, chronic pain disorders, psychiatric conditions, pregnancy or breastfeeding, major hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular disease, or recent use of opioids or NSAIDs were excluded from the study.

All patients underwent standard preoperative assessment, including overnight fasting and anesthetic evaluation. General anesthesia was induced with propofol and atracurium and maintained with isoflurane. Intraoperative monitoring included heart rate, blood pressure, ECG, oxygen saturation, and end-tidal CO₂. Residual neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine at the end of surgery. Postoperative care included intravenous diclofenac sodium every 8 hours for baseline analgesia and ondansetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting.

Postoperative pain intensity was recorded at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients experiencing significant pain were administered intravenous Kinz 5 mg as rescue analgesia, and the timing was documented by nursing staff.

This study provided important information on the comparative efficacy of lidocaine and magnesium sulphate for postoperative pain management, highlighting their potential role in multimodal analgesic strategies to improve patient comfort and recovery following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

168

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 78400
        • Anesthesiology Department Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-65 years. ASA physical status I-II. Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy planned under general anesthesia. Normal baseline renal, hepatic, and coagulation profile. Able to give informed consent and communicate pain scores. Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • ASA III-V patients. Allergy or hypersensitivity to ketamine, lidocaine, or related drugs. History of psychiatric illness or substance abuse. Chronic use of opioids, benzodiazepines, or MAO inhibitors. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Chronic pain disorders or use of analgesics within 7 days pre-op. Major hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular dysfunction. History of myopathy or seizure disorders. Patients with atrioventricular block or on calcium-channel blockers. Conversion to open cholecystectomy during surgery. Inability to understand or report pain postoperatively.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Magnesium Sulphate Group
The magnesium sulfate dose was prepared as 2 mg, diluted with normal saline to a total volume of 10 mL, and administered intravenously as a single stat dose at the time of anesthesia reversal after completion of surgery.
Patients in the magnesium sulfate group received 2 mg of the drug, which was diluted with normal saline to a total volume of 10 mL and administered intravenously as a single stat dose at the time of anesthesia reversal following completion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The injection was performed under aseptic conditions by an anesthetist who was blinded to group assignment. All participants received routine postoperative care, including intravenous diclofenac sodium 75 mg every 8 hours for baseline pain control and intravenous ondansetron 4 mg to prevent nausea. Postoperative pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Patients experiencing significant pain were given intravenous Kinz 5 mg as rescue analgesia, and the timing of administration was recorded for documentation.
Active Comparator: Lidocaine Group
A total of 3 mL of 2% lidocaine was combined with 7 mL of normal saline to prepare a 10 mL solution, which was given intravenously as a single stat dose at the time of anesthesia reversal immediately after the surgery was completed.
Patients in the Lidocaine group received 3 mL of 2% lidocaine, diluted with 7 mL of normal saline to prepare a 10 mL solution, which was administered intravenously as a stat dose at the time of anesthesia reversal, immediately after surgery. The intervention was given using the same protocol and blinding method as the Ketamine group to maintain uniformity. Similar to Group K, all patients received standard postoperative medications, including IV diclofenac sodium and ondansetron. Pain assessment was performed using the VAS scale at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Patients requiring additional pain relief were given IV Kinz 5 mg as rescue analgesia, with the time of each administration noted.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain Score
Time Frame: Postoperative pain was assessed at the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours.
Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and duration of analgesia between the ketamine and lidocaine groups. These time intervals were selected to monitor both the early and late postoperative pain responses during the first 24 hours of recovery.
Postoperative pain was assessed at the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mustafa Hussain Imam, MBBS, Liaquat National Hospital
  • Study Director: Ali Asgher, Mbbs, FCPS, Liaquat National Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain Management

Clinical Trials on IV 2mg of Magnesium Sulphate

Subscribe