Contribution of Transthoracic and Transcranial Ultrasonography to the Titration of PEEP in Patients With ARDS and ABI

December 26, 2025 updated by: Theodoros Schizodimos

The Contribution of the Combination of Transthoracic and Transcranial Ultrasonography to the Titration of Positive End-expiratory Pressure in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Acute Brain Injury

The present study will investigate whether the combined use of lung and brain ultrasonography is useful in selecting the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute brain injury, aiming at an individualized, brain-protective ventilation strategy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present study aims to evaluate whether the combined use of lung ultrasonography and brain ultrasonography can assist in determining the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute brain injury (ABI). In patients with concomitant respiratory and neurological injury, selecting an appropriate PEEP level is particularly challenging, as strategies that improve lung aeration may simultaneously increase intracranial pressure or compromise cerebral hemodynamics.

Lung ultrasound will be used to assess aeration patterns and guide lung recruitment through the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS), while transcranial Doppler ultrasonography will be used to evaluate cerebral blood flow and intracranial pressure surrogates, such as the pulsatility index. By integrating both assessments, the study seeks to identify a PEEP level that optimizes pulmonary function while minimizing adverse effects on cerebral physiology. The overarching goal is to develop an individualized, brain-protective ventilation strategy for patients with ARDS and ABI.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54248
        • Recruiting
        • George Papanikolaou General Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Severe acute brain injury (e.g., traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke)
  • Development of ARDS (according to Berlin criteria) within the first 10 days of ICU admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe chronic brain diseases
  • Brain tumor or central nervous system (CNS) infection
  • Severe chronic pulmonary or cardiovascular disease
  • Severe coagulopathy
  • Undergoing decompressive craniectomy
  • Lack of invasive neuromonitoring
  • Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment
  • Poor acoustic window in ultrasound

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Stepwise PEEP Elevation Protocol Arm
All participants with ARDS and ABI will undergo a protocolized stepwise increase of PEEP at four levels. Each participant will serve as their own control.
The intervention includes a stepwise increase in PEEP level from 5 to 8, 12 and 16 centimeter of water (cmH2O). After each PEEP level change, lung ultrasound and transcranial doppler will be performed, and the values of intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain oxygen partial pressure (PO2), as well as the mechanical ventilation parameters, will be recorded. Arterial blood gases will be taken 20 minutes later.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in PEEP Levels Between Optimal PEEP (LUS-Guided) and Safe PEEP (TCD and Respiratory Mechanics-Guided)
Time Frame: From the start of the intervention until completion of the PEEP titration procedure, within approximately 120 minutes from intervention initiation.

Optimal PEEP is determined using the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS; aeration score 0-36), while Safe PEEP is determined based on Transcranial Doppler (TCD) measurements (Pulsatility Index, mean flow velocity) and respiratory mechanics parameters (driving pressure, plateau pressure, compliance). The outcome represents the difference between Optimal PEEP and Safe PEEP expressed in cmH₂O.

Unit of Measure: cmH₂O

From the start of the intervention until completion of the PEEP titration procedure, within approximately 120 minutes from intervention initiation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation Between PEEP Difference and Clinical Outcomes
Time Frame: From the intervention until ICU discharge and hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days

Correlation between the difference in PEEP levels (cmH₂O) and the following clinical outcomes: duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, and ICU/hospital mortality.

Unit of Measure:

PEEP difference: cmH₂O, Duration of mechanical ventilation: days, ICU length of stay: days, ICU mortality: %, Hospital mortality: %

From the intervention until ICU discharge and hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Theodoros Schizodimos, MD, 2nd Intensive Care Unit, George Papanikolaou General Hospital of Thessaloniki

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

November 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Stepwise Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Increase Protocol

Subscribe