Hand Cooling With Ice Packs in Healthy Young Men (ICEHAND)

November 19, 2025 updated by: Poznan University of Physical Education

Effects of Ice-Pack Application on Hand Skin Temperature and Subjective Thermal Sensation and Comfort in Healthy Young Men: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Controlled Trial

This randomized, parallel-group study looked at how a standard 15-minute ice pack applied to the back of the hand affects skin temperature and how cold and comfortable the hand feels, compared with a room-temperature water pack. Healthy young men were randomly assigned to one of the two groups during a single laboratory visit. Skin temperature was measured before, during, and after the application, and participants rated their thermal sensation (how cold/warm they felt) and overall comfort.

The main outcome was the change in hand skin temperature right after the 15-minute application. Additional outcomes included comfort and cold-feeling ratings and how quickly skin temperature returned toward baseline during recovery. This was a minimal-risk study; expected short-term effects included temporary cold, numbness, redness, or mild discomfort. No medicines or invasive procedures were used.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Poznan, Poland, 61-871
        • Poznan University of Physical Education, Department of Physical Therapy and Sports Recovery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy male volunteers (university student population).
  • Good general health with no history of neck or upper-quadrant pain.
  • Able to provide written informed consent.
  • Willing to comply with pre-visit restrictions on the study day (abstain from tobacco, coffee, alcohol; no hand ointments for 24 h; wash/degrease hands ≥1 h before testing; refrain from vigorous exercise/physical treatments for 24 h).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes
  • Thyroid or other endocrine dysfunction
  • Significant spinal pain
  • Generalised neurological or rheumatological disorders
  • Regular use of pain medications or psychotropic medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ice Pack (Localized Cryotherapy)
Single 15-minute application of a reusable plastic ice pack (Mueller; Ø 22.86 cm, 946 mL). The pack was filled with 400 g of pre-portioned cylindrical ice and placed on the dorsal side of the dominant hand, ~1 cm proximal to the wrist-joint line, fully covering the fingers. Participants were supine with the hand slightly elevated; ambient conditions were controlled at ≈22.5 ± 1.0 °C and 55.3 ± 6.5% relative humidity (RH).Contact was maintained throughout the application; thermal sensation/comfort and pain were recorded during the 7th and 15th minutes.
Single 15-minute application of a reusable plastic Mueller ice bag (Ø 22.86 cm, 946 mL). The bag was filled with 400 g pre-portioned cylindrical ice and placed on the dorsal side of the dominant hand, ~1 cm proximal to the wrist-joint line, fully covering the fingers. Participants were supine with the treated hand slightly elevated; ambient temperature and humidity were controlled (≈22.5 ± 1.0 °C; 55.3 ± 6.5% RH). Subjective thermal sensation/comfort (and pain) were recorded at minutes 7 and 15 during application. Arm: Experimental - Ice Pack
Active Comparator: Thermoneutral Water Pack (Control)
Identical 15-minute application using the same Mueller pack filled with thermoneutral water (within ±0.5 °C of limb skin temperature), mass-matched to 400 g. Placement, posture, and ambient conditions mirrored the experimental arm: pack on the dorsal side of the dominant hand, ~1 cm proximal to the wrist-joint line, fully covering the fingers; participants supine, hand slightly elevated; sensation/comfort and pain recorded at minutes 7 and 15.
Identical 15-minute application using the same Mueller bag, filled with thermoneutral water (within ±0.5 °C of limb skin temperature), mass-matched to 400 g. Placement, posture, room conditions, and timing of subjective assessments (minutes 7 and 15) mirrored the experimental arm: bag on the dorsal side of the dominant hand, ~1 cm proximal to the wrist-joint line, fully covering the fingers; participants supine with the hand slightly elevated. Arm: Active Comparator - Thermoneutral Water Pack.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minimum dorsal-hand skin temperature during rewarming (IV-X), by infrared thermography
Time Frame: From immediately after pack removal (0 minutes; time point IV) to 30 minutes after pack removal (time point X).
Region-of-interest (ROI) mean skin temperature (Tsk; °C) on the dorsal hand measured with infrared thermography (IRT; FLIR SC640). The primary estimand is the between-group mean difference (Ice - Thermoneutral) in the nadir (minimum) across rewarming time points IV-X, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Lower values indicate greater cooling.
From immediately after pack removal (0 minutes; time point IV) to 30 minutes after pack removal (time point X).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IRT-RT temperature offset at matched time points I-X
Time Frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation) and at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after ice-pack removal.
Difference between infrared-thermography-derived skin temperature (TskIRT) and resistance temperature detector-derived skin temperature (TskRT), in degrees Celsius (°C), at each matched time point (I-X). IRT values represent ROI averages; resistance temperature (RT) values are point skin temperature readings from a RTD placed between the 3rd and 4th metacarpal bones. Positive values indicate that TskIRT is greater than TskRT. Between-group comparisons across time.
Baseline (after acclimatisation) and at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after ice-pack removal.
Change in Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT) from baseline to immediately post (I → IV)
Time Frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I) and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
MDT (g) via Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments using an up-down procedure; analysed as IV - I. Higher values indicate reduced tactile sensitivity.
Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I) and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
Change in Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT) from baseline to immediately post (I → IV)
Time Frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I) and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
VDT using a 64-Hz Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork (0-8/8 scale); analysed as IV - I. Higher values indicate reduced vibration sensitivity.
Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I) and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
Thermal Sensation (TSS) during cooling and immediately post
Time Frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I), 7 minutes after ice-pack application (time point II), 15 minutes after ice-pack application (time point III), and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
9-point TSS (-4 very cold … +4 very hot) at I-IV; peak during cooling prespecified as the maximum at II or III. Between-group comparison of peak and trajectory.
Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I), 7 minutes after ice-pack application (time point II), 15 minutes after ice-pack application (time point III), and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
Thermal Comfort (CS) during cooling and immediately post
Time Frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I), 7 minutes after ice-pack application (time point II), 15 minutes after ice-pack application (time point III), and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
5-point comfort scale (1 comfortable … 5 extremely uncomfortable) at I-IV; peak during cooling prespecified as the maximum at II or III.
Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I), 7 minutes after ice-pack application (time point II), 15 minutes after ice-pack application (time point III), and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale; VAS) during cooling and immediately after ice-pack removal
Time Frame: Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I), 7 minutes after ice-pack application (time point II), 15 minutes after ice-pack application (time point III), and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).
0-100 mm visual analogue scale; peak during cooling prespecified as the maximum at II or III.
Baseline (after acclimatisation; time point I), 7 minutes after ice-pack application (time point II), 15 minutes after ice-pack application (time point III), and 0 minutes after ice-pack removal (time point IV).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Anna Straburzyńska-Lupa, MD, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy and Sports Recovery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Poznan University of Physical Education, 61-871 Poznań, Poland;
  • Principal Investigator: Pawel P Korman, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy and Sports Recovery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Poznan University of Physical Education, 61-871 Poznań, Poland;

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 11, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 11, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AWF-Poznan-HandIce-RCT-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be available upon reasonable request for non-commercial research. Available IPD will include dorsal-hand skin temperature (IRT ROI means and RTD readings across time points I-X), thermal sensation, thermal comfort, pain VAS, MDT and VDT results, plus a data dictionary. Requests should be sent to [kontakt e-mail]. Proposals will be reviewed by the Principal Investigator; access requires a data use agreement and confirmation of ethics approval/waiver. Supporting materials (study protocol and SAP) and de-identified summary datasets are archived at Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17255092).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From the date of article publication (or trial results posting) for 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified IPD (IRT skin temperature, RTD, thermal sensation/comfort, pain VAS, MDT, VDT, age [years], sex [male]) plus codebook available to qualified academic/non-profit researchers for non-commercial use. Request via email to [PI; pkorman@awf.poznan.pl] with a brief proposal and ethics approval; reviewed by the PI, response within 30 days. Access requires a Data Use Agreement (no re-ID, secure storage, no third-party sharing, use only as approved, cite the primary article/Zenodo, destroy/return within 5 years). Data provided as CSV via secure link after DUA; available from publication/results posting for up to 5 years; no fee.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cold Exposure

Clinical Trials on Ice Pack (Localized Cryotherapy)

Subscribe