Effects of a Treatment Program Based on the Bobath Concept After Hospital Discharge in Children Born Very Preterm

November 27, 2025 updated by: María del Mar Sánchez Joya, Universidad de Almeria

INTRODUCTION: This project is presented as a continuation of the one approved in 2019 (Code: UALBIO2019/013). Early Intervention is defined as all interventions, including prevention, carried out with children aged 0-6 years, their families, and their environment, in order to respond to what each child needs to advance in their development as early as possible.

Psychomotor Delay indicates a slow developmental trajectory in several areas. Premature infants frequently face a potential psychomotor delay, usually due to the immaturity associated with being born earlier than expected. Children born preterm account for 50% of functional diversity in the pediatric population, presenting sequelae in the perinatal period, in the short term, and in the long term. In a previous study conducted by our group, the importance of early follow-up and treatment for children born very preterm was demonstrated.

Neurodevelopmental disorders with motor impairments in children require physiotherapy treatment from the time of diagnosis, throughout early childhood intervention, and across the lifespan. The most prevalent condition is cerebral palsy, which is the leading cause of childhood disability. Its prevalence ranges from 1.5 to 3.0 per 1,000 live births, with no major changes observed in adolescent and adult populations, and with higher occurrence in males than females. Other important conditions due to their frequency and symptoms include congenital malformations and syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of advanced physiotherapy programs on development, activity, and participation in children receiving early intervention and presenting motor disorders.

METHODOLOGY: Clinical trial with experimental groups and one control group. Advanced physiotherapy programs based on evidence will be studied, carried out with and involving the family, and supported by specialized care.

The sample will be obtained from centers and associations collaborating with the University of Almería. Before conducting the study, informed consent will be requested from parents or legal guardians. Baseline assessments and follow-up measurements will be performed. Validated and relevant variables related to development and motor difficulties will be used. The data obtained during the project will be stored in a database.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Almería, Spain, 04120
        • University of Almeria

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Premature infants with a gestational age between 24 and 32 weeks, with an adequate weight for their gestational age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological disorders
  • Invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Congenital disorders
  • Necrotising enterocolitis
  • Metabolic diseases
  • Intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3-4
  • Genetic disorders
  • Oral disorders that make this process difficult(cleft palate, cleft lip...)
  • Serious illnesses according to medical criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TreatBOB
This group will receive an intervention based on the Bobath Concept, following the Bobath Clinical Reasoning Framework (BCRF). This approach adopts a holistic, systems-science perspective, considering the dynamic interaction between body functions, activities, participation, and contextual factors according to the ICF model.
Experimental: TreatNO-BOB
This group will receive standard pediatric physiotherapy commonly implemented in early intervention services for children with motor disorders. The treatment will follow conventional approaches with a more impairment-based focus
Experimental: NoTreat-NO-BOB
This group will receive ordinary care, defined as the standard protocol-based follow-up provided by the public health system, unrelated to Early Intervention physiotherapy services

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gross Motor Skills
Time Frame: 2 Years

To evaluate the baby's gross motor competence during early motor development, the investigators will employ the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). This tool, developed by Canadian researchers, is an observational assessment designed for infants from birth until they achieve independent walking. It includes 58 items that examine antigravity muscle control and overall motor performance across four positions: prone, supine, sitting, and standing (de Albuquerque et al., 2015).

This tool provides percentile scores (0-100) for gross motor developmental, with higher scores indicating more advanced abilities.

2 Years
Neuromotor Development
Time Frame: 2 Years

To evaluate motor, cognitive, and language development, the investigators will use the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III), one of the most widely applied instruments for assessing early development. Its primary purpose is to identify children who may present developmental delays and to guide the planning of appropriate interventions. The Bayley-III consists of six subscales that measure cognitive, language, motor, social-emotional, adaptive, and behavioral skills in children aged 1 to 42 months (de Albuquerque et al., 2018).

This tool provides percentile scores (0-100) for each developmental domain, with higher scores indicating more advanced abilities.

2 Years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parents Experiences about Development
Time Frame: 2 Years

To screen overall developmental progress, the investigators will use the Ages & Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition (ASQ-3). This parent-completed tool assesses children from 1 to 66 months across five domains: communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem-solving, and personal-social skills. Each questionnaire includes age-specific items that allow caregivers to report their child's abilities through simple observations.

The ASQ-3 helps identify children who may need monitoring or further evaluation, providing a practical and reliable measure of early developmental functioning.

This tool provides scores (0-60) for each developmental domain, with higher scores indicating more advanced abilities.

2 Years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 22, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

November 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available for one year once the study is finished

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Reasonable request to reproduce the intervention performed on this study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Motor Disorder

Clinical Trials on Bobath

Subscribe