Feasibility Study of a Transition Pathway at Discharge From Full Hospitalization in Oncology (PATROL)

January 26, 2026 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Etude de faisabilité d'un Parcours de Transition à la Sortie d'Hospitalisation complète en Oncologie - Etude Pilote Monocentrique

Patient reported outcomes (PRO) measure the health status directly reported by the patients, without external interpretation, generally collected using self-questionnaires, including online tools (ePRO). This approach is useful in early detection of signs of relapse, with reduced anxiety, improved quality of life and survival, and reduced readmissions to emergency departments in patients with advanced cancer. In the current context where hospitalization is increasingly short, the transition from hospital to home is a critical moment that poses a significant safety challenge Patient follow-up strategies help patients return home, particularly in surgery, with telephone calls from a nurse the day after or several days after discharge. In oncology, telephone calls from the pharmacist 3 days after discharge from hospital helped to identify undesirable effects of treatments. In general medicine, these calls have led to improved patient satisfaction, reduced use of emergency departments and the resolution of drug-related problems, but are costly. The introduction of post-hospitalization ePRO monitoring in oncology could ensure effective follow-up while keeping costs under control. A coordinating nurse could manage this process and play a crucial role in accompanying patients when they return home.

The study authors aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a transitional nurse consultation and ePRO follow-up on discharge from full hospitalization in oncology in this population of frail and elderly patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nîmes, France, 30000
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier de Nîmes
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Frédéric Fiteni
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Astrid Basset
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pauline Vazquez
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Bruno Beudot

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive patients treated as inpatients in the Medical Oncology Department of Nîmes University Hospital and scheduled to be discharged and returned home.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • Adult patient hospitalized in an oncology unit for at least 48 hours.
  • Patient capable of using a connected device, in possession of a smartphone or tablet, and with an internet connection at home.
  • Patient discharged from hospital to go home.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
  • The subject refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to give the subject informed information
  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
  • Patient considered to be at the end of life.
  • Patient unable to read and understand French
  • Patient discharged from hospitalization to a home care facility
  • Patient having been hospitalized in a full-time inpatient setting for a scheduled procedure (chemotherapy or interventional procedure)
  • Pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compliance with ePRO monitoring
Time Frame: Day 2
Percentage of patients who responded to all questionnaires
Day 2
Compliance with the telephone call at day 7
Time Frame: Day 7
Percentage of patients successfully contacted at day 7
Day 7
Patient satisfaction with the care pathway
Time Frame: Day 15
Question: "Are you satisfied with your care pathway?" (Yes/no)
Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of the transition pathway to home
Time Frame: Day 15
Care Transitions Measure (CTM-3) questionnaire, where a 10-point increase reduces the risk of readmission by 14%
Day 15
Quality of life as reported by the patient
Time Frame: Day 0
EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: The score for each subscale ranges from 0 to 100and good quality of life is associated with a high score on the functional scales and a low score on the symptom scales.
Day 0
Quality of life as reported by the patient
Time Frame: Day 7
EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: The score for each subscale ranges from 0 to 100and good quality of life is associated with a high score on the functional scales and a low score on the symptom scales.
Day 7
Quality of life as reported by the patient
Time Frame: Day 15
EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: The score for each subscale ranges from 0 to 100and good quality of life is associated with a high score on the functional scales and a low score on the symptom scales.
Day 15
Quality of life as reported by the patient
Time Frame: Day 30
EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: The score for each subscale ranges from 0 to 100and good quality of life is associated with a high score on the functional scales and a low score on the symptom scales.
Day 30
Patient satisfaction with their care
Time Frame: Day 15
EORTC PATSAT-C33 questionnaire: The total score ranges from 0 to 100
Day 15
Rate of readmissions to a healthcare facility
Time Frame: One month after hospitalization
Rate of readmissions to healthcare establishments (hospitalization department, emergency room)
One month after hospitalization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Astrid Basset, CHU de Nîmes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NIMAO/2023-2/AB01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on OncoCare transition program

Subscribe