NavSTAR Implementation Effectiveness Trial Across a Health System (Philly NavSTAR)

November 21, 2025 updated by: Friends Research Institute, Inc.

Implementing a Patient Navigation Intervention Across a Health System to Improve Outcomes for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

Patient Navigation (PN) interventions following hospitalization can improve outcomes for people with opioid use disorder treatment. Delivering PN interventions on a wide scale requires many resources and coordination across institutions. This will use an evidence-based process to find solutions to these significant barriers by engaging community, hospital, and patient partners. This study is being conducted to learn more about how to implement NavSTAR, a patient navigation intervention for people with opioid use disorder, across a health system. The research team showed in a previous study with 400 participants that NavSTAR significantly increased entry into opioid use disorder treatment, reduced readmissions to the hospital, and was highly cost- effective compared to treatment as usual. This study will first pilot NavSTAR with 32 patient participants across 4 hospitals in the City of Philadelphia. Then, a large trial with 720 patient participants will be conducted to see if people who need the intervention are reached, and a sustainable plan will be created to continue the intervention after the grant award period.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is protective against overdose, yet less than 20% of people with opioid use disorder (OUD) engage in such treatment. Hospital utilization is high among people with OUD and can be a 'reachable moment' to initiate OAT. However, most hospitals lack the capacity to follow up with patients after discharge. Patient navigation (PN) interventions following hospital discharge can help patients engage in OAT and navigate complex systems of care. However, challenges persist in implementing PN interventions on a wide scale, as they require coordination across organizations, data sharing, dedicated personnel, and resources. To bring these interventions to scale, strategies are needed to determine feasibility, reach, and sustainability. Testing innovative implementation strategies for PN interventions has the potential for significant impact, as it will demonstrate implementation success of an intervention that can address the opioid epidemic in real-world settings and close the research-to-practice translation gap. The proposed study is a type II hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of Navigation Services to Avoid Rehospitalization (NavSTAR). The research team showed in a single-site randomized trial with 400 participants that NavSTAR significantly improved OAT entry, reduced readmissions, and was highly cost-effective compared to treatment as usual. The present study will test an Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategy to provide training, resources, and performance feedback to implement NavSTAR in five hospitals in Philadelphia. It is hypothesized that engaging stakeholders in an IF strategy will yield an implementation process that is feasible, acceptable, and effective in improving outcomes for patients with OUD. During the R33 phase, a type II hybrid-implementation-effectiveness trial of NavSTAR will be conducted with 720 participants using a randomized stepped-wedge design.

The proposed study is a type II hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of Navigation Services to Avoid Rehospitalization (NavSTAR). The present study will test an Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategy following Proctor's conceptual model of implementation, using an external facilitator and internal local clinical champions to provide training, resources and performance feedback to implement NavSTAR in five hospitals. It is hypothesized that engaging stakeholders in an IF strategy will yield an implementation process that is feasible, acceptable, and effective in expanding engagement in OAT post-discharge. This type II hybrid implementation-effectiveness randomized stepped-wedge trial (N=720) will examine NavSTAR's sustained use in a hospital system to improve outcomes for patients with OUD.

R33 Specific Aims:

  • Aim 1: Determine the successful implementation of NavSTAR in terms of a) feasibility, b) reach, and c) sustainability using the newly developed hospital system protocol.
  • Aim 2: Determine the effectiveness of NavSTAR to a) improve OAT initiation in the three months post-discharge, b) decrease hospital utilization (inpatient readmissions and emergency department visits), c) reduce overdoses (fatal and non-fatal), and d) improve other patient outcomes (e.g., quality of life, substance use).

The proposed study has high public health significance because it will develop and test an implementation strategy for an intervention (NavSTAR) to improve OAT engagement and outcomes for patients with OUD. The study will yield novel data on how best to implement NavSTAR across a health system operating in an epicenter of the OUD crisis. Study findings will help to develop a path to scale-up this important intervention to address the opioid epidemic.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

720

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age 18 or older;
  2. current DSM-5 criteria for moderate to severe OUD;
  3. willing and able to provide informed consent in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. enrollment in OUD treatment 30-days prior to hospitalization;
  2. residency outside the City of Philadelphia;
  3. pregnancy;
  4. planned discharge to a long-term inpatient care facility (e.g., hospice);
  5. hospitalization for a suicide attempt.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Treatment as Usual
Treatment as usual consists of standard management by the medical or surgical team during inpatient admission, and usual care from the addiction consult service, if applicable, which provides social work consults, withdrawal symptom management, and initiation of naltrexone, buprenorphine, or methadone. All standard hospital services will be available to participants.
Experimental: NavSTAR
NavSTAR consists of TAU plus contact with a trained patient navigator who delivers the NavSTAR intervention, inclusive of theory-based motivational content, during and after discharge from the hospital. The patient navigator also has access to a small participant fund to assist with overcoming structural barriers to care (e.g., phone, obtaining IDs, a meal, a taxi ride etc.). Using the NavSTAR PN manual, the PN will address internal and external barriers to engagement in OAT through motivational intervention techniques and proactive case management and care coordination services. Contact with the PN begins at the bedside while the participant is admitted to the hospital and continues for 3 months after discharge
NavSTAR consists of TAU plus contact with a trained patient navigator who delivers the NavSTAR intervention, inclusive of theory-based motivational content, during and after discharge from the hospital. The patient navigator also has access to a small participant fund to assist with overcoming structural barriers to care (e.g., phone, obtaining IDs, a meal, a taxi ride etc.). Using the NavSTAR PN manual, the PN will address internal and external barriers to engagement in OAT through motivational intervention techniques and proactive case management and care coordination services. Contact with the PN begins at the bedside while the participant is admitted to the hospital and continues for 3 months after discharge

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Opioid Agonist Treatment initiation
Time Frame: 3 months
Post-discharge rate of OAT initiation will be ascertained via health record review and self-report with verification through records where applicable (e.g., Community Behavioral Health system).
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility: Demonstrated ability to enroll participants in the intervention
Time Frame: From baseline until end of study, approximately 30 months
Feasibility will be measured based on the number of participants who received the intervention during the implementation period.
From baseline until end of study, approximately 30 months
Inpatient readmissions (30 days)
Time Frame: 30 days
Information on acute care hospital inpatient readmission within 30 days will be assessed using health records and self-report (in the event of inconsistency, objective data will dominate).
30 days
Inpatient readmissions
Time Frame: through 3, 6, and 12 months
Inpatient hospital readmissions (number of events) will be assessed using health record review and self-report (in the event of inconsistencies, objective data will dominate).
through 3, 6, and 12 months
Emergency department visits
Time Frame: through 3, 6, and 12 months
Emergency Department utilization (number of events) will be assessed via health record review and self-report (in the event of inconsistency, objective data will dominate).
through 3, 6, and 12 months
Self-reported days of opioid use in the past 30 days
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Self-reported days of non-prescribed opioid use in the past 30 days will be assessed at each interview.
Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-months
Opioid use
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up
Positive oral fluid test for non-prescribed opioids (e.g., fentanyl, heroin, etc.)
3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up
Overdose events
Time Frame: through 3, 6, and 12 months
Overdose events will be assessed by self-report and health records (for non-fatal events) and death records (for fatal events)
through 3, 6, and 12 months
Changes in Social Support from Baseline to Follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up
Social support will be measured using the Social Support Scale to determine the extent to which services influenced social support. It is a numeric scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater social support.
Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up
Changes in Quality of Life from Baseline to Follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow up
Quality of life will be measured via the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument. It is a numeric scale with scores possible from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.
Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow up
Changes in Psychological distress from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale will be used to assess how participants have been feeling (nervous, hopeless, restless, depressed, worthless, etc) during their last 30 days. It is a numeric scale with scores ranging from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress.
Baseline to 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Patient-Directed Discharge
Time Frame: At discharge (assessed up to 12 months)
Patient-directed discharge from the index hospitalization (i.e., "against medical advice") will be determined by health record review.
At discharge (assessed up to 12 months)
Mortality
Time Frame: through 12 months
Mortality will be tracked from participant monitoring and death records
through 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 3, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R33DA059033 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Participants will complete baseline surveys and follow-up study surveys, and some participants will complete qualitative interviews. The raw interview and survey data will be stored within a secure computing environment. Metadata, study protocols, data collection instruments (surveys, interview guides), codebooks, and de-identified versions of participant data will be preserved and shared as appropriate to facilitate interpretation and reuse.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified data and metadata will be deposited in a recognized repository such as the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) or another NIH-approved repository recommended by NINR. Once archived, datasets will be assigned persistent unique identifiers (such as DOIs) and indexed using repository tools and NIH-mandated descriptors to ensure they are findable and citable.

De-identified data will be made available no later than the first publication of primary results or the end of the performance period, whichever comes first. Derived or summary datasets associated with publications will be shared with minimal delay. Shared data will remain available for at least five years following project completion, or longer if required by the repository or by NIH policy.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

FRI is committed to facilitating access to study data for individual researchers or other stakeholders, upon reasonable request and execution of a data sharing and use agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Opioid Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on NavSTAR (Philly adaptation)

Subscribe