- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07262190
NavSTAR Implementation Effectiveness Trial Across a Health System (Philly NavSTAR)
Implementing a Patient Navigation Intervention Across a Health System to Improve Outcomes for Patients With Opioid Use Disorder
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is protective against overdose, yet less than 20% of people with opioid use disorder (OUD) engage in such treatment. Hospital utilization is high among people with OUD and can be a 'reachable moment' to initiate OAT. However, most hospitals lack the capacity to follow up with patients after discharge. Patient navigation (PN) interventions following hospital discharge can help patients engage in OAT and navigate complex systems of care. However, challenges persist in implementing PN interventions on a wide scale, as they require coordination across organizations, data sharing, dedicated personnel, and resources. To bring these interventions to scale, strategies are needed to determine feasibility, reach, and sustainability. Testing innovative implementation strategies for PN interventions has the potential for significant impact, as it will demonstrate implementation success of an intervention that can address the opioid epidemic in real-world settings and close the research-to-practice translation gap. The proposed study is a type II hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of Navigation Services to Avoid Rehospitalization (NavSTAR). The research team showed in a single-site randomized trial with 400 participants that NavSTAR significantly improved OAT entry, reduced readmissions, and was highly cost-effective compared to treatment as usual. The present study will test an Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategy to provide training, resources, and performance feedback to implement NavSTAR in five hospitals in Philadelphia. It is hypothesized that engaging stakeholders in an IF strategy will yield an implementation process that is feasible, acceptable, and effective in improving outcomes for patients with OUD. During the R33 phase, a type II hybrid-implementation-effectiveness trial of NavSTAR will be conducted with 720 participants using a randomized stepped-wedge design.
The proposed study is a type II hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of Navigation Services to Avoid Rehospitalization (NavSTAR). The present study will test an Implementation Facilitation (IF) strategy following Proctor's conceptual model of implementation, using an external facilitator and internal local clinical champions to provide training, resources and performance feedback to implement NavSTAR in five hospitals. It is hypothesized that engaging stakeholders in an IF strategy will yield an implementation process that is feasible, acceptable, and effective in expanding engagement in OAT post-discharge. This type II hybrid implementation-effectiveness randomized stepped-wedge trial (N=720) will examine NavSTAR's sustained use in a hospital system to improve outcomes for patients with OUD.
R33 Specific Aims:
- Aim 1: Determine the successful implementation of NavSTAR in terms of a) feasibility, b) reach, and c) sustainability using the newly developed hospital system protocol.
- Aim 2: Determine the effectiveness of NavSTAR to a) improve OAT initiation in the three months post-discharge, b) decrease hospital utilization (inpatient readmissions and emergency department visits), c) reduce overdoses (fatal and non-fatal), and d) improve other patient outcomes (e.g., quality of life, substance use).
The proposed study has high public health significance because it will develop and test an implementation strategy for an intervention (NavSTAR) to improve OAT engagement and outcomes for patients with OUD. The study will yield novel data on how best to implement NavSTAR across a health system operating in an epicenter of the OUD crisis. Study findings will help to develop a path to scale-up this important intervention to address the opioid epidemic.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jan Gryczynski, PhD
- Phone Number: 443-676-4219
- Email: jgryczynski@friendsresearch.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Karen Alexander, PhD
- Phone Number: 2673983560
- Email: kalexander@friendsresearch.org
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
- Recruiting
- Jefferson Health
-
Contact:
- Karen Alexander, PhD
- Phone Number: 267-398-3560
- Email: kalexander@friendsresearch.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age 18 or older;
- current DSM-5 criteria for moderate to severe OUD;
- willing and able to provide informed consent in English.
Exclusion Criteria:
- enrollment in OUD treatment 30-days prior to hospitalization;
- residency outside the City of Philadelphia;
- pregnancy;
- planned discharge to a long-term inpatient care facility (e.g., hospice);
- hospitalization for a suicide attempt.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Treatment as Usual
Treatment as usual consists of standard management by the medical or surgical team during inpatient admission, and usual care from the addiction consult service, if applicable, which provides social work consults, withdrawal symptom management, and initiation of naltrexone, buprenorphine, or methadone.
All standard hospital services will be available to participants.
|
|
|
Experimental: NavSTAR
NavSTAR consists of TAU plus contact with a trained patient navigator who delivers the NavSTAR intervention, inclusive of theory-based motivational content, during and after discharge from the hospital.
The patient navigator also has access to a small participant fund to assist with overcoming structural barriers to care (e.g., phone, obtaining IDs, a meal, a taxi ride etc.).
Using the NavSTAR PN manual, the PN will address internal and external barriers to engagement in OAT through motivational intervention techniques and proactive case management and care coordination services.
Contact with the PN begins at the bedside while the participant is admitted to the hospital and continues for 3 months after discharge
|
NavSTAR consists of TAU plus contact with a trained patient navigator who delivers the NavSTAR intervention, inclusive of theory-based motivational content, during and after discharge from the hospital.
The patient navigator also has access to a small participant fund to assist with overcoming structural barriers to care (e.g., phone, obtaining IDs, a meal, a taxi ride etc.).
Using the NavSTAR PN manual, the PN will address internal and external barriers to engagement in OAT through motivational intervention techniques and proactive case management and care coordination services.
Contact with the PN begins at the bedside while the participant is admitted to the hospital and continues for 3 months after discharge
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Opioid Agonist Treatment initiation
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Post-discharge rate of OAT initiation will be ascertained via health record review and self-report with verification through records where applicable (e.g., Community Behavioral Health system).
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility: Demonstrated ability to enroll participants in the intervention
Time Frame: From baseline until end of study, approximately 30 months
|
Feasibility will be measured based on the number of participants who received the intervention during the implementation period.
|
From baseline until end of study, approximately 30 months
|
|
Inpatient readmissions (30 days)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Information on acute care hospital inpatient readmission within 30 days will be assessed using health records and self-report (in the event of inconsistency, objective data will dominate).
|
30 days
|
|
Inpatient readmissions
Time Frame: through 3, 6, and 12 months
|
Inpatient hospital readmissions (number of events) will be assessed using health record review and self-report (in the event of inconsistencies, objective data will dominate).
|
through 3, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Emergency department visits
Time Frame: through 3, 6, and 12 months
|
Emergency Department utilization (number of events) will be assessed via health record review and self-report (in the event of inconsistency, objective data will dominate).
|
through 3, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Self-reported days of opioid use in the past 30 days
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-months
|
Self-reported days of non-prescribed opioid use in the past 30 days will be assessed at each interview.
|
Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-months
|
|
Opioid use
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up
|
Positive oral fluid test for non-prescribed opioids (e.g., fentanyl, heroin, etc.)
|
3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Overdose events
Time Frame: through 3, 6, and 12 months
|
Overdose events will be assessed by self-report and health records (for non-fatal events) and death records (for fatal events)
|
through 3, 6, and 12 months
|
|
Changes in Social Support from Baseline to Follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up
|
Social support will be measured using the Social Support Scale to determine the extent to which services influenced social support.
It is a numeric scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater social support.
|
Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up
|
|
Changes in Quality of Life from Baseline to Follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow up
|
Quality of life will be measured via the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument.
It is a numeric scale with scores possible from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.
|
Baseline to 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow up
|
|
Changes in Psychological distress from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline to 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up
|
Kessler Psychological Distress Scale will be used to assess how participants have been feeling (nervous, hopeless, restless, depressed, worthless, etc) during their last 30 days.
It is a numeric scale with scores ranging from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress.
|
Baseline to 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Patient-Directed Discharge
Time Frame: At discharge (assessed up to 12 months)
|
Patient-directed discharge from the index hospitalization (i.e., "against medical advice") will be determined by health record review.
|
At discharge (assessed up to 12 months)
|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: through 12 months
|
Mortality will be tracked from participant monitoring and death records
|
through 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R33DA059033 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
De-identified data and metadata will be deposited in a recognized repository such as the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) or another NIH-approved repository recommended by NINR. Once archived, datasets will be assigned persistent unique identifiers (such as DOIs) and indexed using repository tools and NIH-mandated descriptors to ensure they are findable and citable.
De-identified data will be made available no later than the first publication of primary results or the end of the performance period, whichever comes first. Derived or summary datasets associated with publications will be shared with minimal delay. Shared data will remain available for at least five years following project completion, or longer if required by the repository or by NIH policy.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Opioid Use Disorder
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity of Chicago; Rogers Behavioral Health; University of California Santa...RecruitingSubstance Use | Methamphetamine-dependence | Opioid Use | Opioid-use Disorder | Cocaine Use Disorder | Cocaine Use | Methamphetamine AbuseUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedSubstance Use Disorder | Opioid Use Disorder | Heroin Use DisorderUnited States
-
Emory UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Georgia Institute of Technology; CUNYCompletedSubstance-Related Disorders | Substance Abuse, Intravenous | Substance Use Disorders | Opioid Use | Substance Abuse | Opioid-use Disorder | Opioid Use Disorder, Severe | Substance WithdrawalUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedOpioid Use | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Center for Progressive Recovery, LLCNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Yale UniversityCompletedCriminal Behavior | Opioid Use Disorder, Moderate | Opioid Use Disorder, SevereUnited States
-
Albert Einstein College of MedicineNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Pfizer; National Institutes of Health...CompletedTobacco Use Disorder | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Indivior Inc.CompletedOpioid Use Disorder, Moderate | Opioid Use Disorder, SevereUnited States
-
Indiana UniversityCompletedOpioid Use | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalOhio State UniversityActive, not recruitingOpioid Dependence | Opioid Use | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
New York State Psychiatric InstituteNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Columbia University; Weill Medical College... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationOpioid Use | Opioid Court Model | Medication to Treat Opioid Use DisorderUnited States
Clinical Trials on NavSTAR (Philly adaptation)
-
Friends Research Institute, Inc.National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Thomas Jefferson UniversityCompleted
-
Friends Research Institute, Inc.National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); RTI International; University of Maryland...CompletedAlcohol Use Disorder | Opioid-use Disorder | Cocaine Use DisorderUnited States
-
Philadelphia Department of Public HealthChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia; Stanford UniversityCompletedHealth BehaviorUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia Department of Public HealthCompleted
-
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchCompleted
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)Terminated
-
Yale UniversityMcGill University; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders...Terminated
-
University of Southern DenmarkCompletedSchizophreniaDenmark
-
Yale UniversityMcGill University; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders...TerminatedConsolidation | SpeechCanada
-
Nigde Omer Halisdemir UniversityGazi UniversityCompletedQuality of Life | Parkinson DiseaseTurkey (Türkiye)