Image-Guided Herniorrhaphy Study

March 19, 2026 updated by: University of California, Davis

Image-guided Herniorrhaphy Safety and Efficacy Pilot

This pilot clinical study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a new image-guided, needle-based approach for repairing abdominal or groin hernias in adults who are unable or unwilling to undergo traditional open or laparoscopic surgery. The technique uses ultrasound and, when needed, CT imaging to guide a hollow needle preloaded with barbed suture through the skin to close the hernia defect without large incisions or general anesthesia. Each participant will undergo one image-guided procedure and will be followed for eight months to assess complications and changes in hernia-related quality of life. Approximately thirty participants will be enrolled. The study aims to determine whether this minimally invasive approach is safe, feasible, and capable of improving hernia symptoms enough to justify a larger clinical trial

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Traditional hernia repair requires either open surgical incisions or laparoscopic entry into the abdomen, typically under general anesthesia. Although effective, these operations can be unsuitable for frail or medically complex patients because of anesthesia risks, postoperative pain, and wound complications.

This investigator-initiated pilot study explores a minimally invasive alternative: a percutaneous, image-guided herniorrhaphy that uses ultrasound or CT to visualize the hernia and guide placement of a barbed suture through a hollow needle to close the tissue defect. The goal is to assess procedural safety, feasibility, and short-term improvement in hernia-related quality of life.

Participants will be adults with reducible abdominal, groin, or hiatal hernias who are not candidates for standard surgery. The study procedure will be performed in the interventional radiology suite using local anesthesia with or without moderate sedation, following existing institutional workflows for other needle-based image-guided procedures.

Safety monitoring is provided by two independent physicians-a hernia surgeon and an interventional radiologist-who review study data quarterly and have authority to pause or stop the study if predefined complication criteria are met. Safety events will be categorized using the Society of Interventional Radiology adverse-event classification.

This study is intended to generate preliminary data on safety and patient-reported outcomes that can inform future trials of image-guided hernia repair techniques.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • UC Davis Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English-speaking adult with reducible hernia(s) or diastasis smaller than approximately 8 cm seeking treatment for their hernia but not able or willing to undergo traditional surgery (open, laparoscopic, or robotic)
  • Patient must be willing to undergo a novel 30- to 60-minute image-guided needle-based procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children, prisoners, and pregnant women (possibly requiring a pregnancy test on the day of the procedure)
  • Patients with a known reaction to local anesthetic or sedation medications or the suture material to be used
  • Patients with irreducible hernias
  • Patients with herniation not visible by ultrasound or CT
  • Patients that do not fit the diameter of a CT gantry or the weight limit of the procedural CT table
  • Patients without insurance or not willing to pay out-of-pocket for the study procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Image-Guided Herniorrhaphy
Single-arm pilot. All participants undergo a percutaneous, image-guided needle-based hernia repair performed under ultrasound and/or CT guidance with local anesthesia and optional moderate sedation. Follow-up includes clinic visits and quality-of-life assessments over ~8 months.

Minimally invasive, image-guided repair of abdominal or groin hernias. Under ultrasound (primary) and, when indicated, low-dose CT guidance, a hollow needle preloaded with bi-directional barbed suture is passed percutaneously across the defect to approximate and secure tissue without surgical incisions or general anesthesia. The procedure is performed in the interventional radiology suite with local anesthesia and optional moderate IV sedation; typical procedure time ~30-60 minutes. Standard post-procedure monitoring is completed prior to discharge.

Arm/Intervention Link: Applied to the "Image-Guided Herniorrhaphy" (Experimental) arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of the Image-Guided Herniorrhaphy Procedure
Time Frame: Through 8 months after the procedure
Frequency, type, and severity of all procedure-related adverse events, categorized according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Adverse Event Classification. Major complications (e.g., bleeding, bowel injury, infection, or events requiring hospitalization >48 hours) and minor complications will be recorded and reviewed by independent safety monitors.
Through 8 months after the procedure
Change in Hernia-Related Quality of Life (Short Form-36 Health Survey)
Time Frame: Through 8 months after the procedure
Mean change in general health-related quality-of-life scores measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey, a validated 36-item measure assessing eight domains of physical and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
Through 8 months after the procedure
Change in Hernia-Specific Quality of Life (Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey)
Time Frame: Through 8 months after the procedure
Mean change in hernia-specific quality-of-life scores measured using the Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey (HerQLes), a validated 12-item instrument used for ventral and abdominal wall hernias. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better hernia-related quality of life.
Through 8 months after the procedure
Change in Reflux-Related Quality of Life (GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire)
Time Frame: Through 8 months after the procedure
Mean change in symptom severity and quality-of-life scores measured using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire, a validated 10-item scale used in patients with hiatal hernias. Scores range from 0 to 75, with higher scores indicating worse reflux symptoms and lower quality of life.
Through 8 months after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Delayed Adhesion-Related Symptoms
Time Frame: Up to 8 months after procedure
Number of participants reporting new or worsening abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, or bowel obstruction potentially related to intra-abdominal adhesions, assessed via follow-up visits and phone calls.
Up to 8 months after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Larson, MD, UC Davis Health - Department of Radiology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inguinal Hernia

Clinical Trials on Image-Guided Herniorrhaphy

Subscribe