kTMP in Chronic Stroke (KULMINATE)

KTMP: A Novel Method of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Patients.

kTMP, kilohertz transcutaneous magnetic perturbations, is a low intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation technique that will be used in this study to promote arm/hand rehabilitation in patients who have been disabled by stroke.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults age 18-80 years old who have had a stroke resulting in hemiplegia
  • Ability to communicate, understand, and give appropriate consent
  • Other criteria may apply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant cognitive impairment
  • inability to adhere to the study protocol or provide informed consent
  • pregnancy
  • additional criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active Treatment
Active treatment with kTMP for 18 weeks
Participants receive kTMP active stimulation for 18 weeks
Other: Crossover Treatment
Initial 9 weeks will receive sham kTMP treatment, followed by 9 weeks of active kTMP treatment.
kTMP 9 weeks sham-kTMP stimulation, followed by 9 weeks active kTMP stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: Enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34.
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a structured evaluation used to measure motor recovery after a stroke, with a total score range of 0-226. Higher scores indicate better motor function, while lower scores reflect greater impairment.
Enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wolf Motor Function Test
Time Frame: At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Measures timed functional tasks, strength testing, and analysis of movement quality when completing various upper extremity tasks. Uses a 6 point ordinal scale (0-5), where ) is does not attempt with the involved arm and 5 is arm does participate and movement appears normal. Maximum score of 75. Lower scores indicate lower functional levels.
At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Stroke Impact Scale
Time Frame: At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Self reported questionnaire that evaluates disability and health related quality of life after stroke, consisting of 59 items, assessing strength, hand function, ADL/iADL, mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, participation/role function. Each item is rated in a 5 point Likert scale, where 1 equals could not do it at all and 5 equals not difficult at all. Score ranges 0-100. Higher score indicates less disability and high quality of life after stroke.
At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Stroke Specific QOL
Time Frame: At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Questionnaire consisting of 49 items in the 12 domains of mobility, energy, upper extremity function, work and productivity, mood, self-care, social roles, family roles, vision, language, thinking and personality. Each item is assessed on a 5 point Guttman type scale, where 1=total help; couldn't do it at all; strongly agree and 5 =no help needed; no trouble at all; strongly disagree. Higher scores indicate better functioning.
At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
EuroQOL
Time Frame: At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
A health questionnaire that measures 5 dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each item is described by 3 levels of problems, where 1=none, 2=mild to moderate, and 3=severe. This provides a simple single index value for health status, where a higher score indicates worse health state.
At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Self reported perception of Quality of movement are rated in 30 functional tasks, scored on a 6 point ordinal scale where 0=weaker arm not used at all for that activity and 5=ability to use the weaker arm for that activity is as good as before the stroke(normal). A higher score indicates better quality upper extremity movement.
At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Modified Ashworth Scale Scores
Time Frame: At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Test of resistance to passive movement about a joint, scores range from 0 to 5 where 0=no increase in muscle tone and 5=affected part(s) rigid. Hight scores indicate greater muscle tone.
At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Action Research Arm Test
Time Frame: At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34
Measures performance of the upper extremity in grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movements, rated on a 4 point ordinal scale where 3=performs test normally and 0=can perform no part of test. Higher score indicates greater function of the upper extremity.
At enrollment, then weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 34

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karunesh Ganguly, MD, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 25-43524
  • R44NS139730 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on kTMP 18 weeks

Subscribe