- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07284329
Examining the Efficacy of a Digital Media Intervention to Increase Recruitment Rates (WHEAT-Boost)
Examining the Efficacy of a Parent-targeted Co-designed Digital Media Intervention to Increase Recruitment Rates Across a Multi-site Randomized Clinical Trial in Canadian NICU's
WHEAT-Boost is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT) that aims to improve how families are recruited into neonatal research studies by testing a new way of sharing information. The study is embedded within the larger WHEAT International Trial, a randomized clinical trial being conducted in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) across Canada. The WHEAT International Trial investigates the best way to manage feeding around the time of blood transfusions in very premature infants (born before 30 weeks of pregnancy).
Recruiting families for research in the NICU is challenging. Parents are often stressed, overwhelmed, and unfamiliar with how clinical trials work, which can make it hard for them to process complex medical information and decide whether to take part. Traditional consent methods, such as paper forms, may not be enough to ensure families feel informed and comfortable with participation.
To address this, WHEAT-Boost will test whether adding a short, co-designed digital video helps improve recruitment rates. The video is 3.5 to 4 minutes long, available in English and French (with subtitles in other commonly spoken languages), and explains the importance of NICU research and details of the WHEAT International Trial in a simple and visual way. The video was co-developed with parents who have experience in the NICU to ensure the information is relevant and easy to understand.
NICU sites participating in the WHEAT Trial will be randomly assigned, in a stepped-wedge design schedule, to either continue using their usual recruitment methods, or to add the digital video to their recruitment approach. Parents in both groups will be asked to complete a short, voluntary questionnaire about their experience with the consent process and their understanding of the trial.
The main goal of WHEAT-Boost is to see if the video increases the number of families who agree to take part in the WHEAT Trial (known as the "opt-in rate"). The study will also look at whether the video reduces the number of families who later withdraw from the trial, and whether it improves parents' understanding of the study and their satisfaction with how information was shared.
If successful, the video could be used in other NICUs or future studies to help make research more accessible and inclusive for families. This approach could lead to stronger participation in neonatal trials, better-informed decisions by parents, and faster progress in improving care for premature babies.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
WHEAT-Boost is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized SWAT embedded within the ongoing WHEAT International Trial (NCT05213806), which evaluates feeding practices around blood transfusion in preterm infants. The SWAT aims to examine whether the addition of a co-designed digital media intervention improves recruitment outcomes, parental comprehension, and satisfaction with the research consent process in the NICU setting.
Fifteen Canadian NICUs participating in the WHEAT International Trial will be randomized in a stepped-wedge design to transition from the control condition (usual recruitment approach) to the intervention condition (usual approach plus video). Each site will act as its own control, with transitions occurring at 29-day intervals. All sites will begin in the control arm, using standard informed or opt-out consent materials, and then sequentially implement the video intervention according to the randomized schedule.
The intervention consists of a 3.5- to 4-minute digital video co-developed with a parent-partner advisory group. The video uses accessible language, storytelling, and visual elements to highlight the role and value of neonatal research and to clarify key details of the WHEAT Trial. It is delivered via a QR code linked to a secure website, enabling families to view the content on personal or institutional devices. The co-design approach ensures the material is tailored to the needs and concerns of NICU families, many of whom may experience emotional distress and information overload during their infant's hospitalization.
This SWAT will evaluate several outcomes. The primary outcome is the WHEAT Trial opt-in rate, defined as the proportion of eligible families who consent to enroll their infant in the trial. Secondary outcomes include the post-randomization withdrawal rate, parental comprehension of trial-specific information, and overall experience with the consent process. These will be measured using a brief questionnaire co-designed with the parent group and administered to all approached families, regardless of group assignment.
Analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes will follow intention-to-treat principles and will use generalized linear mixed models appropriate for the stepped-wedge design. Models will include random intercepts for sites and fixed effects for time and intervention status. For qualitative data from open-ended survey responses, an inductive thematic analysis approach will be applied.
This SWAT addresses a critical need for evidence-based strategies to enhance trial recruitment in high-stress clinical environments like the NICU. By supplementing conventional consent procedures with engaging, accessible media, the study seeks to normalize research participation and support informed decision-making by parents of vulnerable infants. If effective, this low-cost, scalable intervention could be readily adapted to other trials and clinical settings, advancing broader efforts to improve inclusivity and transparency in neonatal research.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Cari-Lee Carnell
- Phone Number: 902-219-2216
- Email: cari-lee.carnell@iwk.nshealth.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Tara Hatfield
- Phone Number: 902-219-2216
- Email: tara.hatfield@iwk.nshealth.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Recruiting
- Royal Alexandra Hospital
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Recruiting
- BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre
-
-
NFLD
-
Saint Johns, NFLD, Canada
- Recruiting
- Janeway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre
-
-
New Brunswick
-
Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
- Recruiting
- Dr. Everett Chalmers
-
Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
- Recruiting
- Moncton Hospital
-
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
- Recruiting
- Saint John Regional Hospital
-
-
Nova Scotia
-
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Recruiting
- IWK Health
-
-
Ontario
-
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Recruiting
- Kingston Health Sciences Centre
-
London, Ontario, Canada
- Recruiting
- London Health Sciences Centre
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Recruiting
- The Ottawa Hospital/CHEO
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Recruiting
- Mount Sinai
-
Windsor, Ontario, Canada
- Recruiting
- Windsor Regional Hospital
-
-
Quebec
-
Laval, Quebec, Canada
- Recruiting
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite Laval
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Recruiting
- Montreal Children's Hospital
-
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Recruiting
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria (applied to infants/participants in WHEAT Trial):
Infant meets eligibility criteria for the WHEAT International Trial
Infant is <30 weeks gestational age at birth
Infant is admitted to one of the participating Canadian NICU sites
Parent(s)/primary caregiver(s) are approached for consent to participate in the WHEAT Trial during a time period when the SWAT is active at their site
Exclusion Criteria:
Infant or family ineligible for participation in the WHEAT International Trial
Parent(s)/primary caregiver(s) not approached for WHEAT Trial participation (e.g., missed recruitment window, language barriers not addressed by materials, medical instability of infant or family)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control (No-Video) Arm
Participants receive the standard informed consent or opt-out consent documentation for the WHEAT International Trial without any additional digital media support.
Research staff approach parents/primary caregivers using the usual verbal and paper-based consent process.
Families then complete a brief questionnaire about their understanding and experience with the consent process.
|
|
|
Experimental: Intervention (Video) Arm
Participants receive the usual informed consent or opt-out consent documentation plus access to a co-designed 3.5-4-minute digital media video that explains the importance of neonatal research and key trial details in an accessible format. The video is intended to supplement and clarify the consent process to improve understanding and recruitment. Research staff provide parents/primary caregivers with a QR code linking to the video hosted on the WHEAT International Trial website. Families are encouraged to watch the video on their personal devices or hospital devices if needed. This is provided alongside the usual consent documentation during the NICU stay. Following this, families complete the same brief questionnaire about their experience and comprehension. |
A 3.5-4-minute co-designed digital media video created to supplement the standard consent process for the WHEAT International Trial.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Opt-in Rate for the WHEAT International Trial
Time Frame: Baseline (When the family is approached for the Study Participation - Within first two weeks of life))
|
The proportion of families approached for participation in the WHEAT International Trial who provide consent (or do not opt out, depending on the site's consent model) for their infant to be enrolled.
|
Baseline (When the family is approached for the Study Participation - Within first two weeks of life))
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Trial Withdrawal Rate (Post-Randomization)
Time Frame: Birth to 40 weeks Post Menstrual Age (From enrollment until study completion)
|
The proportion of enrolled participants who withdraw from the WHEAT International Trial after randomization.
|
Birth to 40 weeks Post Menstrual Age (From enrollment until study completion)
|
|
Parental Comprehension of Trial-Specific Details
Time Frame: Baseline (Once family makes the consent decision - Within first two weeks of life)
|
Degree to which parents understand key elements of the WHEAT International Trial, assessed via a brief questionnaire co-designed with a parent-partner group.
|
Baseline (Once family makes the consent decision - Within first two weeks of life)
|
|
Parental Experience with the Consent Process
Time Frame: Baseline (Once family makes the consent decision - Within first two weeks of life)
|
Parents' perceptions of the clarity, helpfulness, and adequacy of the information provided during the consent process, collected via a brief, co-designed questionnaire.
|
Baseline (Once family makes the consent decision - Within first two weeks of life)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Balpreet Singh, IWK Health
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
- Obeidat HM, Bond EA, Callister LC. The parental experience of having an infant in the newborn intensive care unit. J Perinat Educ. 2009 Summer;18(3):23-9. doi: 10.1624/105812409X461199.
- Voldal EC, Hakhu NR, Xia F, Heagerty PJ, Hughes JP. swCRTdesign: An RPackage for Stepped Wedge Trial Design and Analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105514. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105514. Epub 2020 May 21.
- Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):120-124. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
- Al Maghaireh DF, Abdullah KL, Chan CM, Piaw CY, Al Kawafha MM. Systematic review of qualitative studies exploring parental experiences in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Clin Nurs. 2016 Oct;25(19-20):2745-56. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13259. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
- Lawrence LM, Bishop A, Curran J. Integrated Knowledge Translation with Public Health Policy Makers: A Scoping Review. Healthc Policy. 2019 Feb;14(3):55-77. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2019.25792.
- Ouyang Y, Karim ME, Gustafson P, Field TS, Wong H. Explaining the variation in the attained power of a stepped-wedge trial with unequal cluster sizes. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 24;20(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01036-5.
- Synnot A, Ryan R, Prictor M, Fetherstonhaugh D, Parker B. Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 9;2014(5):CD003717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub3.
- Ballard HO, Shook LA, Desai NS, Anand KJ. Neonatal research and the validity of informed consent obtained in the perinatal period. J Perinatol. 2004 Jul;24(7):409-15. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211142.
- Wilman E, Megone C, Oliver S, Duley L, Gyte G, Wright JM. The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the empirical research. Trials. 2015 Nov 4;16:502. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0957-x.
- Dahav P, Sjostrom-Strand A. Parents' experiences of their child being admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative study-like being in another world. Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Mar;32(1):363-370. doi: 10.1111/scs.12470. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1027137 (SWAT)
- CTR-184893/ CT1-184892 (Other Grant/Funding Number: ACT/CIHR)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Consent Process
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto; Scarborough General HospitalRecruitingInformed Consent ProcessCanada
-
Medical College of WisconsinNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute... and other collaboratorsCompletedImprove the Informed Consent ProcessUnited States
-
Nationwide Children's HospitalCompletedImproving Informed Consent ProcessUnited States
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...CompletedInformed Consent ProcessTaiwan
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedUnderstanding of Consent in Clinical Research | Implementation of Consent in Clinical ResearchUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityCompletedTablet-delivered Informed Consent | Paper-based Informed ConsentUnited States
-
University of ChicagoWithdrawnAnesthesia | Patient Satisfaction | Anesthesia Risks | Anesthesia Consent | Consent RetentionUnited States
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompleted
Clinical Trials on Intervention (Video) Arm
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)RecruitingDementia | Dementia Alzheimers | Caregiver Stress Syndrome | Caregiver Burnout | Dementia, Mild | Dementia Moderate | Dementia Severe | Dementia FrontotemporalUnited States
-
Hiroshima UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompleted
-
Aga Khan UniversityCompleted
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedBreast CancerUnited States
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesCompletedParenting | Health Behavior | Social Acceptance
-
Joanna ChikweCedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USARecruitingMitral Valve Repair SurgeryUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Active, not recruitingDepression | Anxiety | Mobile Phone Use | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | StigmatizationUnited States
-
Ohio State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedHypothetical Cannabis PurchaseUnited States
-
New York State Psychiatric InstituteCompletedDepression | Mental Health Disorder | Adolescent Behavior | Stigma, SocialUnited States