Enhancing Quality of Informed Consent (EQUIC-DP) Developmental Phase

CSP #476DP - Enhancing Quality of Informed Consent (EQUIC-DP) Developmental Phase

Patients in 'parent' cooperative studies projects are interviewed about their experiences in the informed consent process.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Informed Consent

Detailed Description

Intervention: Immediately after giving informed consent for the parent study and before randomization, research subjects will be asked for consent to participate in EQUIC-DP.

The parent-study staff will provide the research subject with privacy and place a call to the coordinating center. Staff (at the EQUIC coordinating center), who will be administering the Brief Informed Consent Evaluation Protocol (BICEP) to the research subject, will introduce themselves. Then, the subject will be interviewed using a BICEP structured assessment questionnaire of approximately 12-20 open ended questions, aimed at determining the success and validity of the informed consent process of the parent study. The results of the interviews will be used to fine-tune and adjust both the process of assessing informed consent in this manner as well as the questionnaire itself.

Primary Hypothesis: Enhancing the Quality of Informed Consent Development Phase (EQUIC-DP) is a pilot and instrument-development study that will be used as the base for a VA Cooperative Studies Program-wide initiative on informed consent, called EQUIC (Enhancing the Quality of Informed Consent). EQUIC-DP has as its primary aim the field testing and iterative improvement of a method for measuring the success of an informed consent encounter with a patient-subject.

Primary Outcomes: The quality of the informed consent process, as measured by the BICEP (Brief Informed Consent Evaluation Protocol). The BICEP also offers a method to certify informed consent in routine use.

Study Abstract: Practitioners of clinical trials have a responsibility to ensure that patients participation in research is informed and voluntary. This implies that we should continuously strive to improve the effectiveness of methods for informing prospective research volunteers about experimental studies, thereby enhancing the likelihood that their interests are respected. Innovations in informed consent should be tested in realistic contexts (i.e., in clinical trials) and when appropriate with randomization at the first opportunity. In this proposed project we take efforts to improve the quality of informed consent, based on experimentation with informed consent in ongoing clinical trials in the VA Cooperative Studies Program. The CSP is uniquely situated to serve as a testing ground for informed consent, not only because of concerns for enhancing consent for human experimentation, but also because of the centralized coordination of wide variety of clinical studies representing an extraordinary range of patient capacities and vulnerabilities. Moreover, such an effort is a special responsibility of the VA given the profound trust placed in the research enterprise by veterans.

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 632

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Alabama
    • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
      • VA Medical Center, Birmingham
  • California
    • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304-1207
      • VA Palo Alto Health Care System
  • Florida
    • Melbourne, Florida, United States, 32901
      • MIMA Century Research Assoc. (CSP #424) (DP)
    • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33410
      • West Palm Beach VA Medical Center
  • Illinois
    • Hines, Illinois, United States, 60141-5000
      • Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital
  • Indiana
    • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-2884
      • Richard Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis
  • Michigan
    • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48113
      • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
  • Minnesota
    • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417
      • VA Medical Center, Minneapolis
    • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
      • Mayo Clinic Rochester (CSP #424) (DP)
  • Missouri
    • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63106
      • VA Medical Center, St Louis
  • Nevada
    • Reno, Nevada, United States, 89502
      • VA Sierra Nevada Health Care System
  • New York
    • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14215
      • VA Western New York Healthcare System at Buffalo
    • New York, New York, United States, 10010
      • New York Harbor HCS
    • Northport, New York, United States, 11768
      • VA Medical Center, Northport
  • North Carolina
    • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
      • VA Medical Center, Durham
  • Pennsylvania
    • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
      • VA Medical Center, Philadelphia
  • Texas
    • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
      • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)
  • Washington
    • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
      • VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Veterans

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Depends on 'parent' study

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Number of groups / cohorts

1

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Time Frame
measuring the process and outcome if informed consent	immediately during patient interview

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: US Department of Veterans Affairs
• Investigators: Study Chair: Philip Lavori, PhD, VA Palo Alto Health Care System

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: April 1, 1999
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 1, 2006
• Study Completion (Actual): February 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 27, 2002
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 27, 2002
• First Posted (Estimate): March 28, 2002

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): March 25, 2010
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 23, 2010
• Last Verified: March 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: 476DP