Functional Lung Avoidance Planning Guided by Lung Perfusion PET/CT Versus Anatomical Planning for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (Pegasus 2)

January 13, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Brest

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has an increasing role in the treatment of both primary and secondary lung tumors. However, lung SBRT remains associated with significant radiation induced lung injury (RILI). Indeed, the reported incidence of symptomatic radiation induced lung injury (grade≥2) in the published literature is up to 20%. A current challenge of lung SBRT is therefore to better preserve lung function and to reduce pulmonary toxicity.

During standard lung SBRT planning, dose constraints are defined on the anatomical lung volume. This planning considers the lung as functionally uniform and does not take into account the variability of regional lung function distribution. Functional lung avoidance is an emerging concept in lung radiotherapy (RT). The technique aims at personalizing RT treatment planning to individuals' lung functional distribution, by sparing functional pulmonary areas while prioritizing delivery of high doses to non-functional regions.

68Ga-MAA lung perfusion PET/CT is a novel imaging modality for regional lung function assessment. As compared with conventional lung scintigraphy, lung perfusion PET/CT is inherently a vastly superior technology for image acquisition (higher sensitivity and spatial resolution, greater access to respiratory gated acquisition). A more accurate lung functional mapping improves the possibility of functional lung avoidance planning for SBRT.

The hypothesis is that functional lung avoidance planning guided by 68Ga-MAA perfusion PET/CT, while delivering an optimal dose to the tumor, will reduce the frequency of RILI in patients treated with lung SBRT.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

418

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69000
    • Finistère
      • Brest, Finistère, France, 29200
        • CHU Brest
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pierrre-Yves Le roux, Professeur

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged > 18 years planned to be treated in the radiotherapy department of the participating centers with SBRT for primary or secondary lung tumors will be eligible to participate into the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Patientsunder guardianship or curatorship
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Contraindications to the radiolabeled product infused for lung perfusion PET/CT.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group:
A conventional anatomical planning will be performed.
Conventional anatomical planning will be performed
Experimental: Experimental group
functional planning will be carried out, respecting the standard constraints especially to the tumor and the anatomical lung volume, but also incorporating "lung functional volume" constraints defined by regional lung function mapping.
Functional Lung Avoidance guided by lung perfusion PET/CT imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine whether a functional planning guided by lung perfusion PET/CT imaging is superior to a conventional anatomical planning with regards to the occurrence of grade 2 or higher lung toxicity during the year following lung SBRT.
Time Frame: At year after baseline
Occurrence of symptomatic RILI (grade≥2 lung toxicity as assessed using the CTCAE 5.0) during the year following lung SBRT. This evaluation will be performed by a medical oncologist blinded from the allocated arm.
At year after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quality of life assessment
Time Frame: Measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline
Quality of life as assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), with scores ranging from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better quality of life for the global health status and functional scales, and worse symptoms for the symptom scales.
Measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline
quality of life assessment
Time Frame: Measured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline
Quality of life as assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-LC29), with scores ranging from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate worse symptom burden.
Measured at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after baseline
quality of life assessment
Time Frame: Measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline
Quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, with index values ranging from -0.594 to 1.0, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline
Grade 3 or higher RILI
Time Frame: Measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline
Lung toxicity as assessed using the CTCAE 5.0, RTOG and Late effects in normal tissue-subjective objective management analysis (LENT-SOMA) scales
Measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline
Local tumor control;
Time Frame: Measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline
Local tumor control;
Measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline
Progression-free survival;
Time Frame: Measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline
Progression-free survival
Measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after baseline
Overall survival.
Time Frame: at 12 months after baseline
Overall survival
at 12 months after baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease of lung perfusion
Time Frame: at 3 months after baseline
Lung perfusion PET/CT imaging
at 3 months after baseline
Overall survival
Time Frame: at 12 months after baseline
Grade≥2 lung toxicity during the year following lung SBRT
at 12 months after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Clinical Trials on Conventional anatomical planning radiotherapy

Subscribe