- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07291791
tDCS for Pain Modulation in Knee Osteoarthritis (KOA-tDCS)
Evaluation of the Neuromodulatory Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common condition that causes long-lasting knee pain and difficulty with daily activities. Many patients have pain that is stronger than expected from joint changes because the nervous system becomes more sensitive to pain. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique that uses a small electrical current applied to the scalp to help reduce pain sensitivity.
This study will test whether active tDCS over the primary motor cortex can reduce pain and improve function in people with knee osteoarthritis. A total of 102 participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active tDCS or sham (placebo) stimulation. All participants will receive 15 sessions over three weeks. We will measure pain intensity, pain sensitivity, physical function, depression, cognition, and quality of life before the treatment, after the 3-week treatment program, and again at the 1-month follow-up.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a major cause of chronic pain, disability, and reduced quality of life. In many patients, the severity of pain exceeds structural joint damage due to peripheral and central sensitization, including impaired conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Such dysfunction in descending inhibitory pathways contributes to pain amplification and poor response to standard treatments. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique capable of modulating cortical excitability, enhancing descending inhibition, and potentially restoring altered pain processing mechanisms.
This randomized, assessor- and participant-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial will investigate the neuromodulatory effects of anodal primary motor cortex (M1) tDCS in patients with KOA exhibiting impaired CPM. A total of 102 participants who meet eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either active anodal M1-tDCS (2 mA, 20 minutes per session) or sham stimulation, using identical electrode placement and brief initial stimulation to maintain blinding. Both groups will receive 15 sessions administered over three consecutive weeks.
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-month follow-up. Primary outcomes include changes in pain intensity measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Secondary outcomes include peripheral and central sensitization measures-Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM), Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), and PainDETECT-as well as functional outcomes assessed using the WOMAC index, Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and One-Leg Stance. Additional outcomes include depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI), cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE), and health-related quality of life (SF-12).
This study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the analgesic and neuromodulatory effects of tDCS in KOA, and to clarify its impact on pain modulation, pain sensitization, physical function, depression, cognition, and overall quality of life.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ismailia, Egypt, 41522
- Suez Canal University Hospitals - Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical criteria.
- Adults of both sexes aged 35 years or older.
- Clinical knee pain persisting for at least 3 months.
- Average knee pain intensity ≥ 4/10 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) during the previous 24 hours, with one dominant affected knee.
- Central sensitization phenotype: impaired conditioned pain modulation (CPM), defined as no change or a reduction in pressure pain threshold (PPT) after the conditioning stimulus, corresponding to a PPT ratio ≥ 1 (pre-to-post stimulus).
- Prior pharmacological pain management with NSAIDs and/or SNRIs discontinued due to adverse effects, intolerance, or contraindications, and able to complete the required washout period (2 weeks for NSAIDs and 4 weeks for SNRIs) before baseline assessment.
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent and comply with study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants will be excluded if they have any condition that could affect cortical excitability, confound outcome measures, or interfere with tDCS safety, including:
- Other chronic pain conditions associated with central sensitization (e.g., fibromyalgia).
- Inflammatory arthropathies (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus).
- Neuropathic pain syndromes (e.g., lumbar or cervical radiculopathy).
- Any clinically significant or unstable systemic disease (cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, or metabolic disorders).
- Pregnancy or active malignancy.
- Neurological or psychiatric disorders including epilepsy, history of syncope, traumatic brain injury with residual deficit, or major depressive disorder.
- Current participation in physiotherapy, electrotherapy, or exercise rehabilitation programs.
- Metallic implants or implanted electrical devices (e.g., pacemakers, cochlear implants, deep brain stimulators).
- Cognitive impairment interfering with understanding instructions or providing informed consent.
- Dermatological contraindications at stimulation or testing sites (e.g., open wounds, infection, irritation).
- History of alcohol or substance abuse, or current use of centrally acting medications that alter cortical excitability (e.g., benzodiazepines).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active tDCS
Participants in this arm (active tDCS group) will receive active anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the primary motor cortex (M1).
Stimulation will be delivered at 2 mA for 20 minutes per session, for a total of 15 sessions (five sessions per week for three consecutive weeks).
Electrode placement follows standardized M1 montage protocols.
|
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that applies low-intensity direct current to modulate cortical excitability.
In this trial, stimulation is delivered over the primary motor cortex (M1) using saline-soaked sponge electrodes.
For the active arm, anodal tDCS is applied at 2 mA for 20 minutes per session, for 15 sessions over three weeks.
For the sham arm, the same electrode placement and device settings are used, but the current is ramped down after approximately 30 seconds to mimic the sensation of active stimulation without producing neuromodulatory effects.
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
Participants in this arm (sham tDCS group) will receive sham tDCS using identical electrode placement and device settings as the active tDCS arm.
The current will be applied for approximately 30 seconds and then gradually ramped down to zero to mimic the initial tingling sensation of active stimulation while delivering no effective stimulation.
A total of 15 sessions will be administered over three weeks.
|
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique that applies low-intensity direct current to modulate cortical excitability.
In this trial, stimulation is delivered over the primary motor cortex (M1) using saline-soaked sponge electrodes.
For the active arm, anodal tDCS is applied at 2 mA for 20 minutes per session, for 15 sessions over three weeks.
For the sham arm, the same electrode placement and device settings are used, but the current is ramped down after approximately 30 seconds to mimic the sensation of active stimulation without producing neuromodulatory effects.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Intensity (VAS and BPI Scores)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up.
|
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).
The primary outcome is the change in VAS and BPI pain scores from baseline to immediately post-intervention and one-month follow-up.
|
Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after completing the 15 treatment sessions, and at 1-month follow-up
|
PPT will be assessed using a digital pressure algometer at two standardized locations on the affected side-the medial knee joint line and the ipsilateral lower leg-to evaluate peripheral sensitization, as well as at a remote site on the forearm to assess central sensitization.
The primary outcome will be the change in mean PPT values across three time points: baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.
|
Baseline, immediately after completing the 15 treatment sessions, and at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Change in Central Sensitization using Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
Central sensitization symptoms will be assessed using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI).
The outcome is the change in CSI total score (0-100) between baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up.
|
Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) Efficiency
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
CPM efficiency will be evaluated using the submaximal-effort tourniquet test.
Pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be measured immediately before and after the conditioning stimulus.
CPM efficiency will be calculated as the ratio of pre-conditioning PPT to post-conditioning PPT.
A pre-to-post stimulus PPT ratio greater than or equal to 1 (indicating no change or a reduction in PPT after conditioning) will be classified as impaired CPM, reflecting deficient descending inhibitory pain modulation.
The outcome is the change in CPM efficiency across baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.
|
Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Change in neuropathic-like pain features (PainDETECT Score)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
Neuropathic-like pain features will be assessed using the PainDETECT questionnaire.
The outcome is the change in PainDETECT total score across baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up.
|
Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Change in physical function (WOMAC Score)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
Pain, stiffness, and physical function will be evaluated using the WOMAC questionnaire.
Higher WOMAC scores indicate greater physical dysfunction.
The outcome is the change in WOMAC total and subscale scores from baseline to post-intervention and follow-up.
|
Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Change in functional performance using Timed Up and Go (TUG) Performance and One-Leg Stance (OLS) Time.
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
Functional performance will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test for functional mobility and the One-Leg Stance (OLS) test for balance.
The outcome is defined as the change in TUG completion time and the change in maximum OLS stance duration (in seconds) across baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.
|
Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Change in depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
The outcome is the change in total BDI score between baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up.
|
Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Change in SF-12 Quality of Life Score
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the SF-12 questionnaire.
The outcome is the change in physical and mental component summary scores from baseline to post-intervention and 1-month follow-up.
|
Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Change in cognitive function using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
Cognitive function will be evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
The outcome is the change in MMSE score across baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up.
|
Baseline, immediately after the 15-session intervention, and at 1-month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nourhan E. Elkaraly, M.B.B.Ch.2015; MSc (PMRR)2020, Suez Canal University, Faculty of Medicine
- Study Chair: Aziza S. Omar, M.D., Suez Canal University, Faculty of Medicine
- Study Chair: Ahmed F. Genedy, M.D., Faculty of Medicine, Armed Forces Military Academy
- Study Chair: Samah I. Nasef, M.D., Suez Canal University, Faculty of Medicine
- Study Chair: Maha E. Ibrahim, M.D., Suez Canal University, Faculty of Medicine
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Arthritis
- Joint Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Osteoarthritis
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Therapeutics
- Behavioral Disciplines and Activities
- Electric Stimulation Therapy
- Convulsive Therapy
- Psychiatric Somatic Therapies
- Electroshock
- Psychological Techniques
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Other Study ID Numbers
- tDCS121225
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaCompletedKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Edin MešanovićCompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis of the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee | Osteoarthritis of the Knees | Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee | Osteoarthritis Knee | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis of Knee JointBosnia and Herzegovina
-
Golden Jubilee National HospitalJohnson & Johnson; DePuy OrthopaedicsNot yet recruitingOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis (OA) | Osteo Arthritis | Osteoarthritis in the Knee | Osteoarthritis (Knee) | Osteo Arthritis of the KneeUnited Kingdom
-
Dr. David WassersteinSunnybrook Research InstituteRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA) | Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)Canada
-
LifeBridge HealthMicroPort Orthopedics Inc.; Rubin Institute for Advanced OrthopedicsRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis, Knee | Knee Pain Chronic | Arthropathy of Knee Joint | Knee Disease | Osteoarthritis Knees Both | Osteoarthritis Knee Left | Osteoarthritis Knee RightUnited States
-
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis in VarusRussia
-
Lucas R. Cusumano, MDNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Swelling PainUnited States
-
Emory UniversityVertex Pharmaceuticals IncorporatedNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee ArthritisUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)United States
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChinese University of Hong Kong; Zhujiang HospitalNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Clinical Trials on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyTerminatedNeuralgia | Neuropathic PainGermany
-
Manhattan Psychiatric CenterCompletedSchizophrenia | Auditory HallucinationUnited States
-
D'Or Institute for Research and EducationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.; Conselho Nacional... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruitingAttention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity | Attention Deficit DisorderUnited States
-
Oslo University HospitalCompleted
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)RecruitingDepressionUnited States
-
The University of Texas at DallasUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRecruitingMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingUnited States
-
Charles University, Czech RepublicRecruiting
-
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical CenterThe Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center; Center for Veterans Research... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingTraumatic Brain Injury | ImpulsivityUnited States
-
United States Army Aeromedical Research LaboratoryCompletedTranscranial Direct Current StimulationUnited States