Developing and Testing a Machine Learning Enabled Mindfulness Intervention for Reducing Loneliness Among Hong Kong Chinese Older Adults

March 18, 2026 updated by: Chou Kee Lee, Education University of Hong Kong

Developing and Testing a Machine Learning Enabled Mindfulness Intervention for Reducing Loneliness Among Hong Kong Chinese Older Adults: A Hybrid Experimental Design Study

Develop and test an effective machine learning enabled application-based (app-based) mindfulness intervention for reducing loneliness of Hong Kong Chinese older adults.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will utilize a hybrid Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial-Micro Randomized Trial (Hybrid SMART-MRT) to: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of a single-session intervention (SSI) of mindfulness on reducing loneliness; 2) identify the optimal first-line coaching approach after the SSI of mindfulness; 3) examine whether increasing the intensity of human coaching or adding a telephone-based human-delivered booster session will benefit participants who do not respond to the first-line coaching; 4) determine whether sending push notifications increases the engagement of our app-based coaching, by comparing its results with those of no push notification; 5) determine whether sending a recommended activity increases the engagement of our app-based coaching, by comparing its results with those of no recommended activity; and 6) determine whether sending a personalized motivational message increases the engagement of our app-based coaching, by comparing its results with those of a standard motivational message.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Kee Lee Chou, PhD
  • Phone Number: +85229487473
  • Email: klchou@eduhk.hk

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The Education University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 65 or older
  • Possess a smartphone with an Android or iOS operating system
  • Communicable in Cantonese
  • Lonely (cut-off >/=6 on the three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorder, learning disability
  • Active suicide ideation
  • Engaged in psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions in the past year

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: App & Human Coaching + Continue Intervention

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness (App + Human Coaching) Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Continue with existing intervention plan

Active Comparator: Active Control
No rerandomization, no mindfulness, No MRT
Experimental: App & Human Coaching + Increase intensity in human coaching

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness (App + Human Coaching) Non-Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Increase intensity of human coaching

Experimental: App & Human Coaching + Booster

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness (App + Human Coaching) Non-Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Add a booster session

Experimental: App Coaching + Continue Intervention

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness (App Coaching) Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Continue with existing intervention plan

Experimental: App Coaching + Increase intensity in human coaching

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness (App Coaching) Non-Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Increase intensity of human coaching

Experimental: App Coaching + Booster

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness (App Coaching) Non-Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Add a booster session

Experimental: Human Coaching + Continue Intervention

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness (Human Coaching) Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Continue with existing intervention plan

Experimental: Human Coaching + Increase intensity in human coaching

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness (Human Coaching) Non-Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Increase intensity of human coaching

Experimental: Human Coaching + Booster

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness (Human Coaching) Non-Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Add a booster session

Experimental: No Coaching + Continue Intervention

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

No Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Continue with existing intervention plan

Experimental: No Coaching + Increase intensity in human coaching

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

No Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness Non-Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Increase intensity of human coaching

Experimental: No Coaching + Booster

First-line of coaching (4 weeks):

No Single-Session Intervention of Mindfulness Non-Responder

Second-line of coaching (4 weeks):

Add a booster session

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Loneliness
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
UCLA Loneliness Scale; each item will be rated from 1=Never to 4=Always. Total scores range from 20 to 80
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Loneliness
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale; each item will be rated from 1=Yes to 3=No. Total scores range from 0 to 6, with subscale score ranging from 0 to 3.
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Stress
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Perceived Stress Scale; each item will be rated from 0=Never to 4=Very often. Total scores range from 0 to 56.
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Sleep Quality
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; each item will be rated from 0=No difficulty to 3=Severe difficulty. Total scores range from 0 to 21.
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Each item will be rated from 0=Not at all to 3=nearly everyday. Total scores range from 0 to 27
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Physical Health
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; each item will be rated 0=dependent to 1=independent. Total scores range from 0 to 8.
Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Physical Health
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Activities of Daily Living; each item will be rate from 0=dependent to 5/10=independent. Total scores range from 0 to 100.
Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Physical Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Wahler Physical Symptoms Inventory; each item will be rated from 0=almost never agree to 5=agree almost every day. Total score range from 0 to 210.
Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Chronic Illness
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Participants will indicate any presence of chronic illness (e.g., diabetes, asthma, high blood pressure).
Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
MSPSS evaluates the social support derived from three key sources: family, friends, and significant others. Each item will be rated from 1=Strongly disagree to 7=Strongly agree. Total scores range from 12 to 84.
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Lubben Social Network Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
LSNS is used to assess the social networks of participants. Each item will be rated 0=None to 5=9 or more. Total scores range from 0 to 30.
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Generalised Anxiety Disorder; each item will be rated from 0=not at all to 3=nearly every day. Total score range from 0 to 21.
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mindfulness
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale; each item will be rated from 1=Almost always to 6=Almost never. Average score will be calculated.
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Perceived Social Support
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1=Strongly disagree to 7=Strongly agree. Total scores range from 12 to 84, with subscale score ranging from 4 to 28. A higher score indicates higher levels of perceived support.
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Social Isolation
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)
Lubben Social Network Scale; Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0=None to 5=9 or more. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating greater social engagement and lower risk of social isolation.
Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kee Lee Chou, PhD, The Education University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-2024-0147

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data sharing will be available upon reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Loneliness

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness - Continue

Subscribe