Feasibility of a Lifestyle Intervention for Women With Triple-negative Breast Cancer Under Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy (BallastImmun)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Kliniken Essen-Mitte

Feasibility of a Lifestyle Intervention to Switch to a High-fiber, Gut-healthy Diet in Women With Triple-negative Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is considered a tumor with a high risk of recurrence and metastasis and requires aggressive systemic therapy combining immunotherapy and chemotherapy. If the therapy leads to complete remission (pCR), this is prognostically beneficial for patients.

Studies demonstrating the influence of the microbiome on the development of cancer and on the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy and chemotherapy underscore the potential of targeted nutritional interventions. Current data from microbiome research indicate that a high-fiber, gut-healthy diet modulates the microbiota in such a way that the response to and toxicity of immunotherapy and chemotherapy could be improved.

The aim of this project is to translate these findings into clinical care. The study will investigate whether an online integrative oncology group training program with mind-body elements supports and is feasible for the implementation of a high-fiber diet in patients with TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. The program will be compared with a control group that receives a flyer with nutritional recommendations. If the feasibility of this complementary medicine approach can be demonstrated, a confirmatory study is planned to investigate the expected effect on the pathological complete remission of TNBC.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study examines a nutritional concept developed specifically for this study with regard to the implementation of a switch to a high-fibre diet in patients with TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. This nutritional concept is embedded in an online, integrative oncology group training programme with mind-body medicine elements to support the change in diet and its tolerability. This intervention is compared with a control group that receives standard care, i.e. a flyer and an educational training video with nutritional recommendations based on the guidelines of the German Nutrition Society (DGE).

The following criteria have been established to determine the feasibility of these two target levels:

  • Recruitment
  • Consent to participate and randomisation
  • Dropout rate
  • Implementation of the intervention (dietary change and acceptance/effect of mind-body elements)
  • Completeness of data collected for at least 80% of patients who complete the study

If the study proves feasible and demonstrates the viability of this integrative medical approach in women with TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant immunotherapy, a confirmatory intervention study with a larger sample size is planned. This study aims to contribute to expanding the current knowledge base and improving existing treatment options. The follow-up study aims to investigate the effects of the nutritional concept and the group training programme on the pCR of TNBC. It will analyse whether the nutritional concept and the group training programme enhance the response to immunotherapy and improve its tolerability in the study participants. The findings from this study will therefore be incorporated into the follow-up study, which will investigate the potential for an improved immune response to therapy and, at the same time, identify possible positive effects of the nutritional intervention on the side effect profile of immunotherapy. Furthermore, the design of the nutritional concept and/or the group training programme could be adapted for the follow-up study if the results are appropriate. The findings from both studies will then be transferred to clinical care, thereby optimising the current treatment options for TNBC patients and increasing their chances of recovery in the long term.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Rhine-Westphalia
      • Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 45276
        • Recruiting
        • Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte gGmbh
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients aged 18-75
  • Histologically confirmed diagnosis of non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNM stage I-III) with planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy
  • Willingness to participate in the study and signed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced stage of disease with metastases
  • Severe physical or psychopharmacologically treated psychiatric comorbidity that prevents a patient from participating in the study
  • Pregnancy
  • Participation in other clinical studies involving behavioral, psychological, or complementary medical interventions
  • A diet that is incompatible with a high-fiber diet, such as the ketogenic diet
  • Abuse of drugs and/or alcohol
  • Inability to complete the questionnaires independently
  • Colectomy
  • Gastrointestinal stenosis
  • Fructose intolerance
  • Histamine intolerance
  • Gluten intolerance
  • Ketogenic diet
  • Unwillingness to refrain from taking probiotics for the duration of the study
  • Eating disorders
  • No laptop and/or camera available to participate in the online group training program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Switching to a high-fibre diet in patients with TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemot
Switching to a high-fibre diet is supported by multi-professional consultation hours, individual counselling and group sessions that combine mind-body medicine and nutritional therapy content.
The aim of the intervention is to support patients in implementing a high-fibre diet (20-30 g of fibre per day) before and during systemic therapy. A multi-professional team consisting of a specialist doctor, a qualified nutritionist and an MBM therapist ensures comprehensive support during lifestyle modification. While the nutritional counselling provides recommendations for optimising diet, the MBM intervention addresses behavioural factors such as motivation, self-efficacy expectations and dealing with barriers to action. In addition, the specialist provides advice on symptom management.
Active Comparator: control group receives official dietary recommendations
Control group receives standard care, i.e. a leaflet and an educational training video with dietary recommendations of the Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Ernaehrung (DGE)
providing official dietary recommendations and an educational training video based on these recommendations of the guidelines of the German Nutrition Society (DGE)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary target parameter is the feasibility of the planned study and the intervention.
Time Frame: from the enrolment to the end of treatment at 6.5 months

The feasibility criteria are defined in the following categories: Recruitment:

  • Recruitment is considered feasible if the required sample size of n = 60 patients can be recruited within 17 months.
  • Randomisation: Randomisation is considered feasible if at least 25% of potentially eligible patients agree to participate in the study
  • Dropout rate: A maximum dropout rate of 20% per group is considered proof of feasibility.
  • Intervention: The intervention is considered feasible if at least 80% of the patients who complete the study are able to implement the nutritional intervention according to protocol. Implementation according to protocol is defined as a fibre intake of at least 20 g/day and the consumption of fermented foods.

Data collection: Data collection is considered feasible if complete data on the planned primary endpoint parameter of the planned confirmatory study, pCR, is available for at least 80% of the patients who complete the study.

from the enrolment to the end of treatment at 6.5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Course of therapy (pCR)
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline
Course of therapy in the sense of a complete response to systmatic therapy (= complete pathological remission)
6 months after baseline
Toxicity (CTCAE 6.0) including adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline
adverse events
6 months after baseline
Fatty acid profile (stool sample analysis)
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months after baseline
Fatty acid profile
baseline and 6 months after baseline
α-diversity and β-diversity of the microbiome (stool sample analysis)
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months after baseline
diversity of the microbiome
baseline and 6 months after baseline
Body weight
Time Frame: baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
Body weight
baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
Self-reported quality of life (FACT-B = Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast)
Time Frame: baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
quality of life, ranges from 0 to 4, with lower scores indicating higher stress levels which means a lower quality of life
baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
Self-reported fatigue (FACIT fatigue = Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatgigue)
Time Frame: baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
Self-reported fatigue, scale from 0 to 4 with lower value indicating a greater fatigue. Two items are reversed.
baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
Self-reported fiber intake (dietary records)
Time Frame: baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
Self-reported fiber intake
baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
Self-reported tolerance of increased fiber intake (IBS-SSS = irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system)
Time Frame: baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
Self-reported tolerance of increased fiber intake, symptoms are rated on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 100 points. 100 points indicate the most severe irritable bowel symptoms.
baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline
Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
baseline, 1 to 3 weeks after baseline (start of the chemotherapy), 3 months after baseline, 6 months after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024001-PV3

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Microbiome

Clinical Trials on switching to a high-fibre diet

Subscribe