- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07314099
Impact Evaluation of Breizh Fabribus Intervention for Personalized Assistive Technology Creation or Adaptation (BFB-IMPACT)
Évaluation d'Impact de l'Intervention du Breizh Fabribus Pour la création ou l'Adaptation d'Aide Technique personnalisée (BFB-IMPACT)
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
The BFB-IMPACT protocol is a retrospective, mixed-methods study designed to assess Breizh Fabribus's impact on daily functioning and satisfaction among people with disabilities. All individuals who received at least one assistive device from Breizh Fabribus between January 1, 2024, and December 31, 2025, are identified via routine service records. Eligible participants and their caregivers are contacted by phone or mail and provided with study information and a consent form. Upon consent, baseline data-including demographics, medical history, and the nature of the activity difficulty-are extracted from initial request forms.
At the time of device delivery, each participant completes the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) to capture immediate feedback on device fit, usability, and co-creation experience. Three months later, participants receive a standardized follow-up questionnaire addressing: frequency of device use; changes in exposure to the originally problematic activity, rated on a five-point ordinal scale; satisfaction with device performance; and open-ended comments on barriers or facilitators. Data collection is conducted via secure online surveys or postal forms, with up to two reminders for nonresponders. An optional twelve-month follow-up is offered within the scheduled data-collection window (October 2025-May 2026) to explore longer-term durability of benefits.
The primary endpoint compares baseline and three-month follow-up scores on the activity exposure scale using paired statistical tests. Secondary analyses include trends in satisfaction scores, logistic regression to identify predictors of device adoption, and inductive content analysis of open-text feedback.
Data collection concludes in May 2026. Analysis is planned for June 2026, followed by manuscript preparation and dissemination to stakeholders in the second half of 2026. Continuous monitoring by the study coordinator ensures protocol adherence, timely follow-up, and resolution of any deviations.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Matthieu PICHELIN
- Phone Number: 02 98 02 11 36
- Email: rcpromotion@ildys.org
Study Locations
-
-
Finistère
-
Brest, Finistère, France, 29200
- Recruiting
- Fondation Ildys
-
Contact:
- VALLEE
- Phone Number: 0298293939
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any person who has received assistance from BFB for the creation or adaptation of assistive technology
Exclusion Criteria:
- objection to the use of their data
- Sollicitation but no delivery of technical assistance by BFB
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in frequency of exposure to the index activity limitation at three months post-intervention
Time Frame: Three months following delivery of the personalized assistive device.
|
Change in the frequency with which participants encounter their initial activity limitation, measured via a standardized 5-point ordinal scale at baseline and at three months post-intervention.
On this scale, 1 represents "never exposed to the activity limitation" and 5 indicates "exposed every day."
Lower scores correspond to less frequent difficulty, while higher scores reflect more frequent difficulty with the targeted activity.
This outcome assesses the impact of the personalized assistive device provided by Breizh Fabribus.
|
Three months following delivery of the personalized assistive device.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with the Assistive Device
Time Frame: At device delivery and three months post-intervention.
|
Participant satisfaction measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8: range 8-32, higher scores indicate greater satisfaction) at delivery and by the ESAT Satisfaction Scale (range: 0-10, higher scores indicate greater satisfaction) at three months.
|
At device delivery and three months post-intervention.
|
|
Frequency of Device Use
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention
|
Self-reported frequency of use in the targeted activity, measured using a 5-point Device Use Frequency Scale (1 = never, 5 = every day; higher values indicate more frequent use).
|
Three months post-intervention
|
|
Barriers to Device Utilization
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
|
Open-ended responses analyzed for reported barriers to use.
Qualitative analysis.
|
Three months post-intervention.
|
|
Influence of Sociodemographic Factors
Time Frame: Three months post-intervention.
|
Analysis of association between demographic characteristics and outcome measures based on CSQ-8, ESAT, and Device Use Frequency Scale.
|
Three months post-intervention.
|
|
Reasons for Requesting the Assistive Device
Time Frame: At baseline (device request/intake).
|
Qualitative coding of motivations as reported by participants at intake.
|
At baseline (device request/intake).
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with the Assistive Device (12 Months)
Time Frame: Twelve months post-intervention.
|
Participant satisfaction assessed using the ESAT Satisfaction Scale (range: 0-10, higher scores indicate greater satisfaction) at twelve months post-intervention.
|
Twelve months post-intervention.
|
|
Frequency of Device Use (12 Months)
Time Frame: Twelve months post-intervention.
|
Self-reported frequency of use in the targeted activity, measured using the 5-point Device Use Frequency Scale (1 = never, 5 = every day; higher scores indicate more frequent use) at twelve months.
|
Twelve months post-intervention.
|
|
Barriers to Device Utilization (12 Months)
Time Frame: Twelve months post-intervention.
|
Open-ended responses analyzed for reported barriers to use of the assistive device, assessed at twelve months post-intervention, qualitative data only.
|
Twelve months post-intervention.
|
|
Change in Exposure to Activity Limitation (12 Months)
Time Frame: Twelve months post-intervention.
|
Change in the frequency with which participants encounter the initial activity limitation, measured via a standardized 5-point ordinal scale (1 = never, 5 = every day) at baseline and twelve months post-intervention.
|
Twelve months post-intervention.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- RI2025_004
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Amputation
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabUniversity of AlbertaActive, not recruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, Traumatic | Amputation; Traumatic, LimbUnited States
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedAmputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, CongenitalUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the WristUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityRecruitingEvaluation of Functionality of Amputees According to the Medicare Functional K Classification SystemAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerTurkey
-
Point DesignsEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAmputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, CongenitalUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabRecruitingAmputation | Amputation, Traumatic | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb | Amputation of KneeUnited States
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerItaly
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
Boninger, Michael, MDNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Ripple Therapeutics...RecruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, HandUnited States