Omnipod-5 A French Prospective Multicentric Study in Real World (Optimal-B)

May 28, 2026 updated by: Insulet Corporation
The purpose of this postmarket clinical investigation is to evaluate the levels of glycemic control, quality of life, and satisfaction, as well as the patient experience, and acute diabetes complication rates provided by the Omnipod 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System (referred to as the Omnipod 5 System) in a real-world setting.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Twelve-month, real-world, non-interventional, prospective follow-up of adult and pediatric patients aged more than 2 years old, prescribed the commercially available FreeStyle Libre 2 Plus configuration of the Omnipod 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System in France.

OPTIMAL-B study (Omnipod 5 - A French Prospective Multicentric Study in Real World), aims to provide the requisite real-world data on the glycemic control, quality of life, safety, and device usage profiles of users of the Omnipod 5 System during the 12 months after starting using Omnipod 5 in automated mode.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

152

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49100
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Angers
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Regis COUTANT
        • Contact:
          • Lucie DUFOUR
      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Besançon - Hôpital de Jean Minjoz
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sophie BOROT
        • Contact:
          • Julie GUCCIARDI
      • Bobigny, France, 93000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • APHP Hopital Avicenne
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Emmanuel COSSON
        • Contact:
          • Sarah YAHIAOUI
      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU bordeaux - Hopital Pellegrin
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sandra POCHELU
        • Contact:
          • Caroline BOUYSSOU
      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital St-André
        • Contact:
          • Bogdan CATARGI
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bogdan CATARGI
      • Brest, France, 29200
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Brest - Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Emmanuel SONNET
        • Contact:
          • Pascale Quiniou
      • Bron, France, 39500
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Femme Mere Enfant
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kevin PERGE
        • Contact:
          • Karima RENDJA
      • Corbeil-Essonnes, France, 91100
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alfred PENFORNIS
        • Contact:
          • Catherine PETIT
      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • Recruiting
        • CIRDIA
        • Contact:
          • Sylvie PICARD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sylvie PICARD
      • Dijon, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bruno VERGES
        • Contact:
          • Isabelle SIMONEAU
      • La Rochelle, France, 17019
        • Recruiting
        • GH La Rochelle-Ré-Aunis - Hôpital Saint Louis
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Didier GOUET
        • Contact:
          • Harivola ANDRIANTAOLO
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94270
        • Not yet recruiting
        • APHP Hôpital Bicêtre
        • Contact:
          • Marie-Agathe TROUVIN
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marie-Agathe TROUVIN
      • Mainvilliers, France, 28300
        • Recruiting
        • Institut de Diabétologie et de Nutrition du Centre
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Said BEKKA
        • Contact:
          • Eva BRIAND
      • Marseille, France
        • Recruiting
        • Fondation Ambroise Paré - Hôpital Européen de Marseille
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pauline SCHAEPELYNCK
        • Contact:
          • Audrey OLIVETTI
      • Montpellier, France, 34090
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eric RENARD
        • Contact:
          • Manal AL MASRI-SHBAT
      • Palavas-les-Flots, France, 34250
        • Recruiting
        • Institut Saint Pierre
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Fabienne DALLA VALE
        • Contact:
          • Chrystel LEPERCHOIS
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Not yet recruiting
        • APHP Hôpital Lariboisière
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jean-Pierre RIVELINE
        • Contact:
          • Charline POTIER
      • Paris, France, 75019
        • Not yet recruiting
        • APHP Hopital Robert Debré
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elise BISMUTH
        • Contact:
          • Caroline ARNAUD-SARTHOU
      • Périgueux, France, 24000
        • Recruiting
        • CH Périgueux
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christine COFFIN
        • Contact:
          • Aude ANGELESCU
      • Saint-Jean-de-Védas, France, 34430
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique Saint Jean de Védas
        • Contact:
          • Mérédith MERCIER
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Elizabeth BONNEMAISON
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
        • Recruiting
        • CHRU Strasbourg
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nathalie JEANDIDIER
        • Contact:
          • Samir CHENAF
      • Tours, France, 37000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Tours
        • Contact:
          • Sophie GOUNIN
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yannis CHARTIER

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population contains patients (age ≥ 2 years) with T1DM initiating a commercially available configuration of the Omnipod 5 System using a FreeStyle Libre 2Plus in France.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with T1D aged ≥ 2 years.
  • Patient prescribed, less than a year ago, a commercially available confi guration of the Omnipod 5 System using a FreeStyle Libre 2 Plus sensor.
  • Patient has never used the Omnipod 5 System prior to inclusion.
  • Patient has not objected to the use of their personal data for this study.
  • Patient or legal guardian has an email address and mobile phone number.
  • Patient (and legal guardians if the patient is a minor) is able to understand study information and Non-Opposition form.
  • Patient (and legal guardians if the patient is a minor) is able to understand and complete questionnaires in French.
  • Patient is covered by the local social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is currently pregnant.
  • Patient presents an allergy to the materials of the Omnipod 5 System (patch, cannula, CGM).
  • Patient is unable to be followed by the same investigation site for the duration of the study or is unwilling or unable to maintain contact with the healthcare professional.
  • Patient is already participating in a clinical trial or in another study precluding their participation in other studies.
  • Adult under guardianship, curatorship or tutorship.
  • Adult otherwise deprived of liberty.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Omnipod 5 User
Participation of each patient begins at inclusion and continues until the end-of-study visit, 12 months (± 1 month) following first initiation of automated mode of the Omnipod 5 System

The Omnipod 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System (Omnipod 5 System) is a tubeless insulin pump with a mono-hormonal insulin delivery system designed to deliver U-100 insulin subcutaneously for the management of type 1 diabetes in people aged 2 years and older who require insulin.

The Omnipod 5 System is intended to function as an automated insulin delivery system when used with compatible Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the percentage of time in the 70 - 180 mg/dL range
Time Frame: Change in percentage of time in specified range between Baseline and 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Change in percentage of time in specified range between Baseline and 12-months following first initiation of automated mode

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with GMI ≤ 7%
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the achievement of CGM-based consensus targets
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of patients with CV ≤ 36%
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the achievement of CGM-based consensus targets
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of patients achieving combinations of previous CGM-based consensus targets
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the achievement of CGM-based consensus targets
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire (IDSRQ) interference sub-score
Time Frame: At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the interference of the Omnipod 5 System with patients' daily lives
At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of time using the System in automated mode
Time Frame: 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Describe System use
12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of time using the System in manual mode
Time Frame: 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Describe System use
12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of time using "Activity" feature
Time Frame: 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Describe System use
12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Total daily dose of insulin
Time Frame: 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Describe System use
12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Number of boluses per day
Time Frame: 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Describe System use
12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Targets used by patients
Time Frame: 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Describe System use
12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Bolus/Basal distribution
Time Frame: 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Describe System use
12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Incidence of severe hypoglycemia
Time Frame: 6 months prior to switching to Omnipod 5 and over the 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the incidence and type of acute metabolic complications
6 months prior to switching to Omnipod 5 and over the 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis
Time Frame: 6 months prior to switching to Omnipod 5 and over the 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the incidence and type of acute metabolic complications
6 months prior to switching to Omnipod 5 and over the 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Reasons for having stopped using the Omnipod 5 System
Time Frame: 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the rate at which patients stop using the Omnipod 5 system
12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of time in the 70 - 180 mg/dL range
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of time in the 70 - 140 mg/dL range
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of time below 54 mg/dL
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of time below 70 mg/dL
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of time above 180 mg/dL
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of time above 250 mg/dL
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose Management Indicator (GMI)
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glycemic Risk Index (GRI)
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Coefficient of variation (CV)
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Mean glucose
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Glucose metric from continuous glucose monitoring system to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
HbA1c Level (if available)
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Blood test to assess glucose control
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of patients with ≥ 70%
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the achievement of CGM-based consensus targets
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of patients with < 4%
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the achievement of CGM-based consensus targets
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of patients with < 1%
Time Frame: Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the achievement of CGM-based consensus targets
Up to 12-months following first initiation of automated mode
EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire
Time Frame: At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess patients' general quality of life
At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Unscheduled hospitalizations for diabetes or diabetes complications
Time Frame: 6 months prior to switching to Omnipod 5 and over the 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the incidence and type of acute metabolic complications
6 months prior to switching to Omnipod 5 and over the 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Percentage of patients still using the Omnipod 5 System at the end of study follow-up
Time Frame: 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess the rate at which patients stop using the Omnipod 5 system
12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Pediatric quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess pediatric patients' quality of life with the Omnipod 5 System
At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Patients aged ≥ 18 years: Diabetes Quality of Life - Brief Clinical Inventory (DQL)
Time Frame: At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess patients' diabetes-specific quality of life on a scale of very satisfied to very dissatisfied
At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Patients aged 10-17 years: Diabetes Quality of Life for Youth scale - Short Form (DQOLY-SF)
Time Frame: At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess patients' diabetes-specific quality of life on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (all the time)
At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Patients aged ≥ 18 years: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, status version (DTSQs)
Time Frame: At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess patients' satisfaction with the Omnipod 5 System on a scale of 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)
At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Patients aged 13-17 years: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, status version -Teens (DTSQs - Teen)
Time Frame: At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess patients' satisfaction with the Omnipod 5 System on a scale of 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)
At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Patients aged 2-12 years: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, status version -Parent (DTSQs - Parent)
Time Frame: At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode
Assess satisfaction with the Omnipod 5 System on a scale of 0 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very satisfied)
At inclusion and 6 and 12 months following first initiation of automated mode

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Pierre Riveline, MD, PhD, Centre Universitaire du Diabète et ses complications Hôpital Lariboisière

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Omnipod 5

Subscribe