The Impact of Early Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) Therapy on Diabetes Control and Comorbidities, and Cost-effectiveness of AID Treatment

March 13, 2026 updated by: Tero Varimo, MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital

The Impact of Early Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) Therapy on Diabetes Control and Comorbidities, and Cost-effectiveness of AID Treatment - a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study on Pediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of early initiated automated insulin de-livery (AID) treatment in type diabetes in children aged 7-16 years to glycemic control, diabe-tes distress of patients and caregivers, long-term micro- and macrovascular complications and cost-effectiveness compared to multiple daily injections (MDI) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The immediate costs of AID therapy are higher than costs of multiple daily injection therapy, and there has been debate whether the more expensive AID therapy is justified. No research on the cost-effectiveness of AID use in children has been conducted so far in Finland, and there is generally very little research data on the long-term treatment of type 1 diabetes with AID systems. AID therapy has been studied from the point of diagno-sis of type 1 diabetes in two centers (USA and the UK) but from the perspective of maintain-ing subject's own insulin secretion. A long-term randomized and controlled study on the out-comes and cost-effectiveness of AID therapy, started from diagnosis of diabetes, is essential to create evidence-based data for optimizing current treatment recommendations.

Our hypothesis is that AID treatment keeps the glycemic outcomes in targets in the long term and decreases diabetes distress. During longer time, AID system decreases the amount of micro- and macrovascular complications and is cost-effective treatment for children with type 1 diabetes (CwT1D).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Espoo, Finland, 02740
        • Jorvi Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tero Varimo, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mari-Anne Pulkkinen, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Anna-Kaisa Tuomaala, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Panu Oksanen, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Heidi Falk, MD
      • Helsinki, Finland, 00029
        • New Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Heidi Falk, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tero Varimo, MD,PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anne-Kaisa Tuomaala, MD,PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mari-Anne Pulkkinen, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Panu Oksanen, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children and adolescents aged 7-15 years who are re-cently (within a month) diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the Children's and Adolescents' Unit of HUH at the New Children's Hospital and Jorvi Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Addison's disease
  • Renal failure
  • Untreated coeliac disease
  • Untreated thyroid disorder
  • Poorly controlled asthma, per investigator judgment.
  • Unresolved adverse skin conditions in the area of sensor placement (e.g. pso-riasis, rash, Staphylococcus infection).
  • Participating in an investigational study (drug or device) wherein he/she has received treatment from an investigational study drug or device in the last 2 weeks before enrollment into this study, as per investigator judgment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early AID-treatment
Automated insulin delivery system (Omnipod 5) is initiated after T1D diagnosis. Omnipod5 uses a SmartAdjust™ closed-loop algorithm to automate insulin delivery. Algorithm continuously predicts glucose trends and self-adjusts insulin delivery within safety boundaries. Continious glucose monitoring (CGM) is used.
Omnipod5 uses a SmartAdjust™ closed-loop algorithm to automate insulin delivery. Algorithm continuously predicts glucose trends and self-adjusts insulin delivery within safety boundaries
Active Comparator: Control group
Multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) is initiated after T1D with a standard treatment protocol. Continious glucose monitoring (CGM) is used.
Multiple daily infections of insulin to treat type 1 diabetes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time in Range
Time Frame: During the first 2 years
Percentage (%) of the time patients' glucose levels are within the target range based on continuous glucose monitoring (time in range =TIR, 3.9-10 mmol/l).
During the first 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TINR
Time Frame: During the first 2 years
Time spent (%) in normoglycemic range (TINR, 3.9-7.8 mmol/l) based on continuous glucose monitorin (CGM) data
During the first 2 years
Complications
Time Frame: 15 years
The development of diabetes-related complications such as diabetic nephropathy, diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy, coronary artery disease
15 years
HbA1c
Time Frame: 2 years
The change in HbA1c levels (mmol/mol) during the treatment between the groups
2 years
Mean sensor glucose value
Time Frame: 2 years
The change in mean sensor glucose value (mmol/l) obtained from continuous glucose monitoring between the groups during treatment
2 years
Glycemic variability
Time Frame: 2 years
The change in glycemic variability (coefficient of variation CV (SD/mean sensor glucose x 100%)) obtained from continuous glucose monitoring data between the groups during treatment
2 years
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: 15 years
The cost-effectiveness of different treatment modalities for T1D in children with Cost-Utility Analysis modeling
15 years
Custom food list
Time Frame: During the first 2 years
The Custom Food List is a personalized menu integrated into the AID pump. Patients can select a predefined meal from the list before eating, without calculating the carbohydrate content, and the pump automatically delivers the preset insulin dose assigned to that item. We evaluated the impact of using the Custom Food List on Time in range (TIR, %), Time in Normoglycemic Range (TINR, %), Time below Range (TBR, %), and postprandial glucose levels compared with conventional carbohydrate counting.
During the first 2 years
Continuous Ketone monitoring (CKM)
Time Frame: During the first 2 years
Continous Ketone monitoring with a CKM sensor will be performed at 2 time points during the follow-up period
During the first 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anna-Kaisa Tuomaala, MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Tero Varimo, MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Study Chair: Mari-Anne Pulkkinen, MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available. De-identified data may be shared upon reasonable request to the principal investigator, subject to applicable EU and Finnish data protection legislation and institutional approvals.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Omnipod 5

Subscribe