Supportive Care-Based Training and Psychological Outcomes in Midwifery Students

December 22, 2025 updated by: Gozde Gokce Isbir, Mersin University

The Effect of Training Programs Based on Different Supportive Care Models in Childbirth on Midwifery Students' Clinical Self-Efficacy and Psychological Outcomes

The aim of this study is to comparatively evaluate the effects of trauma-informed supportive care model training in childbirth and universal supportive care model training in childbirth provided to midwifery students on their clinical skill self-efficacy in the delivery room, state anxiety, and secondary traumatic stress levels.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was designed as a quasi-experimental comparative study. Data will be collected from fourth-year midwifery students enrolled in the Midwifery Department of Mersin University during the 2025-2026 academic year who undertake clinical practice in the delivery room of Mersin City Training and Research Hospital. Students who meet the inclusion criteria will be informed about the purpose and procedures of the study, and written informed consent will be obtained. Participants will be allocated to either the universal supportive care model training group or the trauma-informed supportive care model training group based on their academic semester (fall or spring), in line with the existing curriculum structure.

Both training programs will be delivered through theoretical and practical sessions prior to clinical application. Data will be collected from the participants themselves at three time points: before the intervention, immediately after providing childbirth care in the delivery room, and one week after the intervention, using validated self-report measurement tools assessing clinical skill self-efficacy, state and trait anxiety, and secondary traumatic stress levels. The planning, implementation, and reporting of the study will be conducted in accordance with relevant ethical principles and reporting guidelines for quasi-experimental research.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Mersin
      • Mersin, Mersin, Turkey (Türkiye), 33180
        • Gozde Gokce Isbir

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Voluntary participation in the study
  • Native Turkish speakers
  • Enrollment as a fourth-year student in the Midwifery Department of Mersin University during the 2025-2026 academic year
  • Enrollment in Perinatal Health Practices I or Perinatal Health Practices II
  • Participation in delivery room clinical practice at Mersin City Training and Research Hospital
  • No diagnosed psychiatric disorder and no use of psychiatric medication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Withdrawal from the study at any stage upon the participant's own request

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Universal Continuous Supportive Care Model Training

The first study group consisted of midwifery students enrolled in the Perinatal Health Practices I course during the fall semester. Following standard hospital orientation, students received Universal Continuous Supportive Care Model Training in childbirth, developed in line with the recommendations of Adams et al. The training lasted four hours, including one hour of theoretical instruction and three hours of practical application.

The training focused on the core principles of universal continuous supportive care, their integration into clinical practice, and the use of a supportive care skills checklist. The 20-item checklist was developed by the researchers based on the literature to support students' self-evaluation of supportive care skills and included four domains: physical support, emotional support, education/information, and advocacy. Students were also encouraged to use a structured anamnesis form to plan individualized care.

The first study group consisted of midwifery students enrolled in the Perinatal Health Practices I course during the fall semester. Following standard hospital orientation, students received Universal Continuous Supportive Care Model Training in childbirth, developed in line with the recommendations of Adams et al. The training lasted four hours, including one hour of theoretical instruction and three hours of practical application.

The training focused on the core principles of universal continuous supportive care, their integration into clinical practice, and the use of a supportive care skills checklist. The 20-item checklist was developed by the researchers based on the literature to support students' self-evaluation of supportive care skills and included four domains: physical support, emotional support, education/information, and advocacy. Students were also encouraged to use a structured anamnesis form to plan individualized care.

Experimental: Trauma-Informed Supportive Care Model Training

The second study group consisted of midwifery students enrolled in the Perinatal Health Practices II course during the spring semester. Following standard hospital orientation, students received Trauma-Informed Supportive Care Model Training in childbirth, based on the recommendations of the Centre for Early Child Development. The training lasted four hours, including one hour of theoretical instruction and three hours of practical application.

The training addressed the core principles of trauma-informed care, trauma-sensitive communication, and individualized care, with emphasis on integration into clinical practice. A 20-item trauma-informed supportive care checklist was introduced to support students' self-evaluation, structured around recognition and compassion, communication and collaboration, consistency and continuity, and understanding diversity. A trauma-informed anamnesis form was also used to guide individualized care planning.

The second study group consisted of midwifery students enrolled in the Perinatal Health Practices II course during the spring semester. Following standard hospital orientation, students received Trauma-Informed Supportive Care Model Training in childbirth, based on the recommendations of the Centre for Early Child Development. The training lasted four hours, including one hour of theoretical instruction and three hours of practical application.

The training addressed the core principles of trauma-informed care, trauma-sensitive communication, and individualized care, with emphasis on integration into clinical practice. A 20-item trauma-informed supportive care checklist was introduced to support students' self-evaluation, structured around recognition and compassion, communication and collaboration, consistency and continuity, and understanding diversity. A trauma-informed anamnesis form was also used to guide individualized care planning.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Skills Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: before the training and immediately after completion of delivery room clinical practice
Midwifery students' clinical skills self-efficacy was assessed using the Clinical Skills Self-Efficacy Scale (CSSES). The scale was developed by Kang et al. (2019) to evaluate individuals' self-efficacy related to clinical practice. It consists of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor subdimensions. The Turkish version includes 11 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree, with higher scores indicating higher clinical self-efficacy. The Turkish adaptation demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .91).
before the training and immediately after completion of delivery room clinical practice
State and Trait Anxiety
Time Frame: Trait Anxiety-before the training and one week after completion of delivery room practice; State Anxiety-immediately after completion of delivery room practice
Midwifery students' anxiety levels were assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), developed by Spielberger et al. (1970). The inventory consists of two subscales-State Anxiety and Trait Anxiety-each comprising 20 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Some positively worded items are reverse scored. Total scores reflect individuals' current (state) or general (trait) anxiety levels, with higher scores indicating higher anxiety. The Turkish version of the scale demonstrated high reliability, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from .94-.96 for the State Anxiety subscale and .83-.87 for the Trait Anxiety subscale.
Trait Anxiety-before the training and one week after completion of delivery room practice; State Anxiety-immediately after completion of delivery room practice

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Traumatic Stress
Time Frame: Time Frame: one week after completion of delivery room clinical practice
Midwifery students' secondary traumatic stress levels were assessed using the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS), developed by Bride et al. (2005). The scale consists of 17 items across three subdimensions-avoidance, arousal, and intrusion-and is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 17 to 85, with higher scores indicating higher levels of secondary traumatic stress. The Turkish version of the scale demonstrated high internal consistency, with a reported Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .91.
Time Frame: one week after completion of delivery room clinical practice

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 8, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 8, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Secondary Traumatic Stress

Clinical Trials on Universal Continuous Supportive Care Model Training

Subscribe