Digital Otoscopy Versus Standard Otoscopy on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Otitis Media in Young Children (Wispr 2)

May 20, 2026 updated by: Jon Hatoun, Boston Children's Hospital

Site Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effect of Digital Otoscopy Versus Standard Otoscopy on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Otitis Media in Young Children

Randomized controlled trial involving 4 pediatric primary care practices in Massachusetts. Practices will be stratified by their OM diagnosis and treatment rate, with two practices randomly assigned to the intervention arm and two to the control arm.

For practices randomized to the intervention arm, their offices will be equipped with digital otoscopes (Wispr Digital Otoscope, WiscMed) in each exam room in place of traditional otoscopes. Clinicians in intervention practices will attend a two-hour initial training session on the use of digital otoscopy followed by two one-hour follow-up sessions held over a two-month run-in period prior to the study start to review best practices and troubleshoot any difficulties adapting to the new technology.

Upon completion of the run-in training period, a six-month data collection period will begin. The primary outcome will consist of a difference-in-difference analysis comparing the difference in the OM Treatment Index (OMTI) from the baseline period (October 1 through March 31, 2025) to the intervention period (October 1 through March 31, 2026) between the intervention practices and the control practices. The OMTI is a measure of the rate of diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of OM, specifically calculated as the number of cases with an OM diagnosis and systemic antibiotic prescribed divided by the number of visits with a diagnosis of any acute respiratory tract illness.

Secondary outcomes include analogous difference-in-difference comparisons of: 1) overall antibiotic courses prescribed; 2) overall days of antibiotics prescribed; and 3) a balancing measure of the rate of return visits with any acute respiratory tract illness diagnosis within 7 days of an index visit. Additionally, clinicians will be surveyed to assess confidence and satisfaction in diagnosing OM and preference for digital versus traditional otoscopy.

To incentivize participation, practices randomized to the control arm will be loaned digital otoscopes to use for six months at the conclusion of the clinical trial.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Wellesley, Massachusetts, United States, 02481
        • Pediatric Physicians' Organization at Children's

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. PPOC practices with 4-9 patient exam rooms, willing to commit to using digital otoscopy for 6 months.
  2. Not currently using digital otoscopy.
  3. Not involved in the network's previous digital otoscopy study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently using any digital otoscope

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Digital Otoscopy
Use of the Wispr digital otoscope to diagnose otitis media in place of a traditional visual otoscope
Use of the Wispr digital otoscope to diagnose otitis media in place of a standard visual otoscope
No Intervention: No intervention: Control
No intervention - standard otoscopy to be used

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in proportion of visits with any respiratory diagnosis in which otitis media is diagnosed and treated with antibiotics (referred to as the otitis media treatment index - OMTI).
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference-in-differences analysis of the change in OMTI from baseline to the intervention period comparing the intervention arm to the control arm using logistic regression with nested random effect at the practice level.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in overall antibiotic courses prescribed
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference-in-differences analysis of the change in the overall number of antibiotic courses prescribed per 100 encounters (excluding well visits) comparing the intervention arm to the control arm, using logistic regression with nested random effect at the practice level.
6 months
Change in overall prescribed antibiotic days
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference-in-differences analysis of the change in the overall number of prescribed antibiotic days per 100 encounters (excluding well visits) comparing the intervention arm to the control arm, using logistic regression with nested random effect at the practice level.
6 months
Return acute respiratory tract illness visits
Time Frame: Within 7 days of index visit
Comparison between intervention and control arm of the proportion of patients with an index visit with an acute respiratory tract illness diagnosis who return to the PCP for a visit with an acute respiratory tract illness diagnosis within 7 days of index
Within 7 days of index visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Louis Vernacchio, MD, MSc, Boston Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PPOC_Wispr 2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Electronic health record data use for the study are property of the individual practices and may not be shard publicly without their expressed permission.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Otitis Media

Clinical Trials on Device: Digital Otoscope

Subscribe